Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

 


Yep. No way to keep boost high enough on top end without changing duty cycle throughout rpm. Mine is almost linear on duty cycle for rpms after it onsets.

You mean it increases linearly, not you have a flat duty cycle ?

Is yours IWG ?

Yes IWG. And yes increases pretty much linearly.

I posted a log on here not far back. If you download the haltech datalog viewer you can see my output duty cycle on the logs under "boost control output" (which is controlled by open loop) and also my "base duty cycle" (which is my start point before controls - basically my duty cycle map). Just double click those to populate the charts and add the RPM THE same way to see what mine is doing on the high boost IWG BW actuator set at 6 turns from base.


  • Like 1

Found it. White line is boost control output. Notice it's 100% while it spools until it hits my commanded boost number to start open loop control. You can see its pretty linear with RPM to maintain my 18 or so psi boost.
6caa52e8bdeeebcd873bc390c14d3d35.jpg

  • Like 1
On 8/15/2016 at 8:51 AM, VFRegal said:

got a turbosmart dual port locally. It wouldn't hold boost. So changed EBC to one which can have different duties at different rpm but apparently made no difference on the dyno. Pretty much I don't think tuner likes the turbo :blink:.

VFregal - which turbosmart IWG spring and how much preload are you using?  More than likely you need more springs in the IWG actuator..

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

EASILY on 500 RPM earlier on than -5's as a comparison. I won't repeat myself with how it drives, I'll sound like a broken record.

the tuner tried advancing the intake cam to +6 degrees on the intake and all it did was come on SO early it introduced surge. It's not very often of the cam timing having to be relaxed because the turbo is on TOO early! He said this combo on the street would be VERY hard to find. It is the most responsive and torquey GTR he has ever tuned. Maybe he hasn't tuned a stroker/-5 combo ;). He also said if the owner wanted he would like to see a 9180 on it and advance the cam a bit and it wouldn't give away too much.

The Dyno sheet doesn't give any real world indication of how well this thing drives!

So more power down low, extra 40 up high, better transient, and smoother delivery with more left in it. Standard position low mount twins in the bin, EFR for the win!

  • Like 3

^^^^ Please tell me you have some 17-18 psi data!?

I'm assuming E85? I'm glad to start seeing other "real" numbers. I mean this is 620 whp on 25 or so PSI. I am hoping to see 550 whp on my car at the same boost on the 2.75L. I'd love to compare logs to this thing on the street to see how far I have to go.

Also I'm on the Poncam A's (260 and 256 ex) and found that closest to 0-0 made the best results for me too. I tried getting them closer together and it felt "stumpy" in the mid range.

Excellent results!

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Piggaz said:

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

EASILY on 500 RPM earlier on than -5's as a comparison. I won't repeat myself with how it drives, I'll sound like a broken record.

the tuner tried advancing the intake cam to +6 degrees on the intake and all it did was come on SO early it introduced surge. It's not very often of the cam timing having to be relaxed because the turbo is on TOO early! He said this combo on the street would be VERY hard to find. It is the most responsive and torquey GTR he has ever tuned. Maybe he hasn't tuned a stroker/-5 combo ;). He also said if the owner wanted he would like to see a 9180 on it and advance the cam a bit and it wouldn't give away too much.

The Dyno sheet doesn't give any real world indication of how well this thing drives!

So more power down low, extra 40 up high, better transient, and smoother delivery with more left in it. Standard position low mount twins in the bin, EFR for the win!

Looks really good. Awesome results. I don't know much about RB30's. How do you think this would compare to a 26/7/8 RB motor instead?

59 minutes ago, minesskyline said:

Looks really good. Awesome results. I don't know much about RB30's. How do you think this would compare to a 26/7/8 RB motor instead?

Obviously things like engine compression, cam choice/settings, exhaust size etc would play a part in the response. But lets say a 2.8L (because building a 2.7L is silly lol) would probably be around 2-300rpm laggier worst case scenario i would think ?

 

1 hour ago, HarrisRacing said:

^^^^ Please tell me you have some 17-18 psi data!?

I'm assuming E85? I'm glad to start seeing other "real" numbers. I mean this is 620 whp on 25 or so PSI. I am hoping to see 550 whp on my car at the same boost on the 2.75L. I'd love to compare logs to this thing on the street to see how far I have to go.

Also I'm on the Poncam A's (260 and 256 ex) and found that closest to 0-0 made the best results for me too. I tried getting them closer together and it felt "stumpy" in the mid range.

Excellent results!

Yeah thats E85. No logs as the car is still in the shop man lol. 

Your car runs a 3" exhaust doesn't it? If so i honestly think that would be hurting your response a bit and will probably become alot more of an issue when u really start looking to put some more boost into it ?

3.5" minimum would probably help things quite a bit. 

We will try getting some vids up on the weekend when we go for a blast ?

 

9 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

VFregal - which turbosmart IWG spring and how much preload are you using?  More than likely you need more springs in the IWG actuator..

Hi Geoff,

19 psi spring combination and about 4 or 5 turns preload. I'd like to try out my more preload but tuner was against it saying it wont make any difference.
I am going to take the car elsewhere it's just waiting on a new gearbox at the moment. Interested on your thoughts on spring size for target boost pressure.

Cheers

Edited by VFRegal

why isn't everyone that runs external gates or a dual port actuator for IWG using a 4 port boost solenoid?

seems like the obvious choice to me. at 100% duty you KNOW the gate is clamped shut.

Edited by burn4005
9 hours ago, Piggaz said:

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

so boost held at 23-25 psi at the moment due to wanting to run the engine in more?

I just dropped mine off to the tuner this morning. Told him to whack 30psi in to the stock motor haha

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, usmair said:

so boost held at 23-25 psi at the moment due to wanting to run the engine in more?

I just dropped mine off to the tuner this morning. Told him to whack 30psi in to the stock motor haha

Engine is run in. Boost is currently held back as the speed sensor isn't operating currently so he's kinda capping it there for safety currently. He believes its pretty close to being all in as the most he has seen a 8374 make on his dyno is 480kw i believe he said. 

 

5 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Engine is run in. Boost is currently held back as the speed sensor isn't operating currently so he's kinda capping it there for safety currently. He believes its pretty close to being all in as the most he has seen a 8374 make on his dyno is 480kw i believe he said. 

interesting. fairly big difference in power on different dynos. ive seen them make 550kw on a dyno.

I'm not sure they would max out on 25psi though. I know of a setup running 32-34 and it made more n more power with every psi up to around 34 psi.

 

1 minute ago, usmair said:

 

interesting. fairly big difference in power on different dynos. ive seen them make 550kw on a dyno.

I'm not sure they would max out on 25psi though. I know of a setup running 32-34 and it made more n more power with every psi up to around 34 psi.

 

Yeah but it all comes down to engine efficiency.

It's good to see Nick's car with some decent compression rather than the low compression rb's designed for 50 pounds of boost we normally see from Sydney).

1 minute ago, acsplit said:

Yeah but it all comes down to engine efficiency.

It's good to see Nick's car with some decent compression rather than the low compression rb's designed for 50 pounds of boost we normally see from Sydney).

yes i do recall this particular engine was very low comp.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, burn4005 said:

why isn't everyone that runs external gates or a dual port actuator for IWG using a 4 port boost solenoid?

seems like the obvious choice to me. at 100% duty you KNOW the gate is clamped shut.

On that angle, anyone know a supplier of those in Australia?

45 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

On that angle, anyone know a supplier of those in Australia?

what do you mean? it's just a 4 port MAC valve. (46A-AA1-JDBA-1BAA)

s-l500.jpg[/img]

they're 100ish bucks delivered on ebay.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/HI-TEMP-MAC-Boost-Solenoid-Valve-BCS-4-port-AEM-MAC-46A-AA1-JDBA-1BA-NICKEL-/232031631192?hash=item360629b758:g:WrMAAOSw3ydVzVlf

Edited by burn4005
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
×
×
  • Create New...