Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just was looking at the Garrett website and noticed they have put up some new part numbers!

GTX3071R_GT3071R_overlap.jpg

GTX3076R_GT3076R_overlap.jpg

GTX3582R_GT3582R_overlap.jpg

Wonder what pricing will be?!?

Those compressor maps look impressive for big boost and power (should go great with E85!)

Edited by SimonR32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344089-garrett-medium-frame-gtx-turbos/
Share on other sites

Oooo the 3071 looks brilliant in terms of a good RB25 upgrade/stock motor

GT3076 is very interesting too.

GT35 just gets fatter, almost 10lb/min :dry:

That would be a very good upgrade.

But indeed... all comes down to the price lol.

Interesting if they get some 2860 graphs up.

Found this interesting bit of text on a website selling these turbos.

"This is the new Billet version of the previous Garrett GT3076R model.This Dual Ball Bearing turbo has an Oil & Water Cooled center cartridge. This turbocharger is on track to replaced the older GT3582R model as the most popular mid sized turbo on the market. The original GT3076R paved the way for many performance enthusiasts earning its place as the best all around turbo out there for most peoples needs. The new GTX3076R makes more power, spools faster, and is all around better than the GT3076R."

http://realstreetperformance.com/store/57m...turbo-2009.html

So does this mean that your basically in a gtx3071r youll be getting more power than a 3076 and less lag and with the gtx 3076r youll be getting power like a 3582 with the response of a 3076?

So does this mean that your basically in a gtx3071r youll be getting more power than a 3076 and less lag and with the gtx 3076r youll be getting power like a 3582 with the response of a 3076?

as far as the comp maps show there it will be very close, the gtx3071 map is almost spot on the normal 3076 so they will make similar power but the normal 3582 map still flows a few more pounds/Min more than the GTX3076

as far as the comp maps show there it will be very close, the gtx3071 map is almost spot on the normal 3076 so they will make similar power but the normal 3582 map still flows a few more pounds/Min more than the GTX3076

Well aslong as gtx3076 makes more power than before without added lag then I think I found my next turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...