Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bonus... no finger waving this week!!

golden

Great race today. The new regs even make China exciting Bodes well for the rest of the year.

Jense- Wrong pit box, w.t.f mate? Crew colours aren't even remotely close.

Yeah on neighbours years ago

Google images to the rescue;

LibbyandDrew_large.jpg?1251288241

pretty sure he was a Big Bother contestant wasnt he?? one of those straight to neighbours kinda cool cats......that cant act...

anyways. GOOO!!! Webber. finally got his car into action. if he'd got out of the croud out the back early on he would have had Vetool and Hamo easily. but it took him half the race to wake up and start driving like we all know he can :)

awesome race overall!! bring on more of that.....instead of Vetool out front and everyone else naively trying to catch him

Edited by boiracer

I'm a big button fan but wtf man?! Wrong pit box, that could have cost him the win!!

Go Webber! Fk off the fact he's the unluckiest man in f1 in many years, had a horrific qualifying day and got 18th, has car issues and traffic and hell, he just overcomes that with brute force, love it! Also should set some of his critics straight. I was so hoping he'd overtake Vettel at the end, would have been out-of-seat cheering!

Lol at above, I also said that this year is gonna be good given how exciting china is haha.

What do people think about the drs? Good/Bad? I've been thinking for a while now that they need a straight back and front wing with minimal body downforce, like back in the old days when you didn't have to be massively faster to pass. Given they can't change all that, the drs seems to work pretty well. It'd be more interesting if the drivers could use it more often, harder for them but the fans would love the exciting racing that would come from it. China has two massive straights and it was only available for the last half of one of them, if it was available earlier Webber would have had a shot at victory and it would have been the best drive in many many years (despite that it still is!). It does make the racing a bit artificial, but the affect of dirty air doesn't exactly keep it pure either.

I'm a big button fan but wtf man?! Wrong pit box, that could have cost him the win

Pretty sure he wouldn't have had the tyre health for that, certainly not compared to Lewis. I thought McLaren were on for a 1|2 before the last series of stops shook out.

At best you could say he might have been 3rd given how small an amount of time the pitbox infarction cost him realistically; But it's hard to say if Mark wouldn't have passed him anyway.

While I'm a fan of Webche, I think many people are missing the fact that he had used 3 sets of brand new soft tyres, due to his 18th place quali.

instant 1-2 seconds a lap quicker.

+1

It was an awesome drive but he had something the rest didn't. There is also no doubt the reason Hammo won was because he had that 1 set of virgin softs. Just look at the lap times he did on thats set of tyres.

They say that they don't cycle well and that race proved just how accurate that assumption was so I think you will find going forwards that all of the front guys will keep at least 1 set of new softs up their sleeves as this has shown that 1 new set of softs in the race is worth probably a min 3 spots in Quali.

While I'm a fan of Webche, I think many people are missing the fact that he had used 3 sets of brand new soft tyres, due to his 18th place quali.

instant 1-2 seconds a lap quicker.

Exactly...if he had qualifed much better lets say top 6 he wouldn't be there...so it was a blessing in disguise for him...

One thing is for sure now...no one can now whinge that webber has an inferior car anymore...the car is capable of the pace...its up to him now...

And as for the interview...funny comments...but don't think it was a smart thing to say...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...