Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.

I've had the #4 on your list at the Rockpool, agree it was a great burger

Also the place where I have had my best steak I have eaten so far

Remember how much the burger was? And was it sit down restaurant style or do they have a more casual bar setup as well?

Colleague just ordered 1199 panigale S

Rich mother f**ker

Remember how much the burger was? And was it sit down restaurant style or do they have a more casual bar setup as well?

Was about $20. It's a sit down restaurant. Rockpool is a very classy and somewhat posh restaurant. It's a two chef hat restaurant so it's up there with the very best.

Was about $20. It's a sit down restaurant. Rockpool is a very classy and somewhat posh restaurant. It's a two chef hat restaurant so it's up there with the very best.

I know what rockpool is, I just thought the burger might be part of a bar menu.

Someone needs to tell Neil perry that the ponytail is out.

Way out

I know what rockpool is, I just thought the burger might be part of a bar menu.

Someone needs to tell Neil perry that the ponytail is out.

Way out

Hrmm not sure. Just went down for a quick lunch and was on the sit down menu. Not sure if their is a bar menu there

30k? Hola...definitely makes it more appealing, considering it's lacking a turbo. Still want to sit in the thing before ordering though.

Good luck. All Pre-sales have been sold out. Friend says only 1800 planned for Australia this year and they all taken.

Good luck. All Pre-sales have been sold out. Friend says only 1800 planned for Australia this year and they all taken.

http://gt86.com.au/toyota-86-may-not-be-sold-out-after-all/

Good luck. All Pre-sales have been sold out. Friend says only 1800 planned for Australia this year and they all taken.

I'm in no rush for it lol. It'd be silly for me to buy a car where my head touches the roof!

Actually, reading up on Toyota's official/claimed figures for acceleration is a little disappointing...7.6 for the manual and 8.2 for the auto in a 0-100 dash. Thought it'd at least be into the high 6's like a Sportivo Corolla...this is N/A Skyline territory :/

I'm in no rush for it lol. It'd be silly for me to buy a car where my head touches the roof!

Actually, reading up on Toyota's official/claimed figures for acceleration is a little disappointing...7.6 for the manual and 8.2 for the auto in a 0-100 dash. Thought it'd at least be into the high 6's like a Sportivo Corolla...this is N/A Skyline territory :/

Ide still get it. Im sure it would be a pretty fuel efficient car, compared to a skyline lol. Kind of hard to compare the two..

I think the track was damp too, which made it even more weird.

yeah that's even more weird, could only say that the gti being lighter and more nimble can make its time up where it really needs to

but in any case I'm still a mk5 fan over the mk6

Haha my friend has the golf gt with dsg (supercharged and turbocharged) zippy car!

mates got one as well, only thing that he comments about it is tuning abilities, GIAC (tunes a lot of golf guys get) don't even supply a tune for his car

gti would still be my pick for really performanced based car out of all of them

I'm in no rush for it lol. It'd be silly for me to buy a car where my head touches the roof!

Actually, reading up on Toyota's official/claimed figures for acceleration is a little disappointing...7.6 for the manual and 8.2 for the auto in a 0-100 dash. Thought it'd at least be into the high 6's like a Sportivo Corolla...this is N/A Skyline territory :/

haha tdi is probably faster :P

Ide still get it. Im sure it would be a pretty fuel efficient car, compared to a skyline lol. Kind of hard to compare the two..

Combined fuel cycle is supposed to be 7.8L/100km, and a little more efficient for the auto, which is about average for a 2 litre these days. It'll be heaps better than a Skyline, but a Skyline is also a lot more car. The thing sure is good looking though - I can see them being popular for purchase in the second hand market and modified heavily with turbo bolt ons.

cops will be all over the turbo kits i'd say (cos a lot of people will be bored of 2.0l n/a power)

i'd go for a 350z - however i understand people wanting a new sporty car for a half decent price

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...