Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Had a headache by the end of the first paragraph you Kent's are too smart for me

Lol Alex, I was about to say the same.. Lol the only reason I know that ethanol burns slower is because I set it in fire at Scott's lol

I like fire

But yeh the bigger arc/gap makes sense!

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

B2YH-vat_original.png

About to happen to me... very hungry so call my mate to go Subway/Schnitz.

Then Pho is brought up. Also very acceptable. Nek minnit his missus also coming (which is no problem... the problem is that she doesn't live *close* and now I have to wait longer until my food is in front of me :'( ).

tl;dr

getting pho, but have to wait :'(

Edited by kaitoukid

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

I'm still gonna say go to .8mm. I don't think you are chasing 350+kw I mean mine were .8 on all my cars. Never had an issue with making powerz

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/techinfo/spark_plugs/faq/faqpregap.asp?nav=31200&country=US

Another consideration that should be taken into account is the extent of any modifications that you may have made to the engine. As an example, when you raise compression or add forced induction (a turbo system, nitrous or supercharger kit) you must reduce the gap (about .004" for every 50 hp you add). However, when you add a high power ignition system (such as those offered by MSD, Crane, Nology) you can open the gap from .002-.005".

Interesting...

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

It does burn cooler, but from what I'm reading, not slower. Google has some conflicting results...some say faster, others say slower...and this also seems to change depending on AFRs too. Ethanol does have a higher autoignition point, making it less prone to detonation and harder to ignite than gasoline...but from what I understand, once ignited, will burn faster. I would like to know which one is correct, is there a way to test it without blowing ourselves up?

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

Ethanol burns slower but an increase in pressure changes it's burn rate drastically. There is also more oxygen to help it burn.

I have seen nearly 1000 degrees C in my manifold, so it certainly doesn't burn cold, just colder than dino 98. This is mainly due to extra timing though, as adding timing gives the fuel more time to burn in the cylinder, not in the exhaust.

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

^^ This. :)

well, burning both fuels at atmospheric would be very different to burning both fuels under cylinder conditions, cylinders have pressure between 160 to 200ish psi? that's from 10 to 15x atmospheric pressure.

mr aero engineer, any input?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yea that's a fair assumption. I'm presuming they call them solid lifters as they have no moving parts like hydro lifters. 
    • I believe you're confusing WMI with water injection. Looking at that graph, the 93aki+WMI car is making more power than C16 race gas. Boost juice, which is what I also run, is Snow Performances 50/50 premix. 
    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
×
×
  • Create New...