Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Had a headache by the end of the first paragraph you Kent's are too smart for me

Lol Alex, I was about to say the same.. Lol the only reason I know that ethanol burns slower is because I set it in fire at Scott's lol

I like fire

But yeh the bigger arc/gap makes sense!

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

B2YH-vat_original.png

About to happen to me... very hungry so call my mate to go Subway/Schnitz.

Then Pho is brought up. Also very acceptable. Nek minnit his missus also coming (which is no problem... the problem is that she doesn't live *close* and now I have to wait longer until my food is in front of me :'( ).

tl;dr

getting pho, but have to wait :'(

Edited by kaitoukid

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

I'm still gonna say go to .8mm. I don't think you are chasing 350+kw I mean mine were .8 on all my cars. Never had an issue with making powerz

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/techinfo/spark_plugs/faq/faqpregap.asp?nav=31200&country=US

Another consideration that should be taken into account is the extent of any modifications that you may have made to the engine. As an example, when you raise compression or add forced induction (a turbo system, nitrous or supercharger kit) you must reduce the gap (about .004" for every 50 hp you add). However, when you add a high power ignition system (such as those offered by MSD, Crane, Nology) you can open the gap from .002-.005".

Interesting...

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

It does burn cooler, but from what I'm reading, not slower. Google has some conflicting results...some say faster, others say slower...and this also seems to change depending on AFRs too. Ethanol does have a higher autoignition point, making it less prone to detonation and harder to ignite than gasoline...but from what I understand, once ignited, will burn faster. I would like to know which one is correct, is there a way to test it without blowing ourselves up?

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

Ethanol burns slower but an increase in pressure changes it's burn rate drastically. There is also more oxygen to help it burn.

I have seen nearly 1000 degrees C in my manifold, so it certainly doesn't burn cold, just colder than dino 98. This is mainly due to extra timing though, as adding timing gives the fuel more time to burn in the cylinder, not in the exhaust.

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

^^ This. :)

well, burning both fuels at atmospheric would be very different to burning both fuels under cylinder conditions, cylinders have pressure between 160 to 200ish psi? that's from 10 to 15x atmospheric pressure.

mr aero engineer, any input?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
    • No. I think it might be the AFM. Hence the use of the terms "swaptronics", which implies the use of swapping out electronics for the purpose of diagnosis. It's about the only way to prove that a small/niggling/whatever problem with an AFM or a CAS or similar is actually caused by that AFM/CAS/whatever. A known good item swapped in that still gives the same problem is likely to be caused somewhere else. They're all the same. Spraying AFMs with cleaner is an each way bet between cleaning it and f**king it.
    • Oh wow! This might actually work amazingly. Do you know the ratio of the diff? I was told the only thing you need to make sure of is if the front & rear diff ratios are the same. Ours is a 4.083 Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...