Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33 series 1 gts/t = ugly

R33 GTR + series 2 gts/t = sexy shizz

R34 = fkin sexy

I personally think the r33's reputation of its looks was horrible because of the series 1 gts/t's, Other than that all the other r33s look fine to me. Matter of taste and opinion. In the end, you own a freakin skyline and thats pretty decent no matter what model it is. if anything im sick of those kents in their commys and falcons thinking their rides are all that, when infact its just an over powered tractor. I mean seriously we should be discussing why people think their commodores are so great, i mean who doesnt own one of them =='

32333435.jpg

looking at that i would have to say the 33 is the smoothest, sleekest, SLIMEST car of the lot....

It also looks the lowest and is the nicest colour...

In fact i have just gained a whole new love for the 33 shape..

I always though it was a bit baulbous looking as well but beside its brothers its gotta be the sexiest of the bunch...

ok firstly...stageas? really ? those massive station-wagons? people actually thing they are good looking? i just assumed that whoever was driving it wanted a skyline but had kids...hence the shitty station-wagon version of the skyline. imo Bar the front(which is a skyline front anyway)...those things are ridiculously hideous......

secondly...duckwings are the shit....but the stock s2 spoiler has really grown on me and suits the car now that its been lowered...so im keeeping it.

Lastly , yes an s1 maroon skyline with that rounded spoiler looks almost as bad as a stagea.

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

thanks for the heads up , but IMO(yeah O stands for opinion) stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it. Like another member on here said ..the only reason he got one is because he wanted to the haul the kids around and in spite of its looks a stagea is till better then any other station wagon out there. If I had kids..id buy a Stagea too.

You obviously dont get the point oif the thread...notice the inverted commas before and after the word "ugly"? I personally LOVE the r33 shape..as I have stated before...and cant seem to understand why the general car community consider it the worst looking of the Skylines...hence the start of this thread

Kids these days got no respect..

I'm sure his mum is fat and ugly too, but if someone didn't drive her he wouldn't be here ..

Id imagine someone with over 8000 posts would have some kind of civility as you've been on this forums for sometime....instead you choose to insult my mother....this has made you feel better/prove your point somehow? I'm not sure I quite understand this keyboard heroism, but you have succeeded in coming of as a massive douchebag- congratulations!

Edited by tripsteady
  • Like 1

Nissan owners make the R33 ugly.

Especially now as they head into "old age" and the paint wears through and they cop dings etc... They need to be treated with TLC but a lot of the ones I see don't get that.

Have a look in your rear view mirror next time you have a 32 behind you and let me know if you can tell wether its an early 90's laser or a 32. I cant.

I have a supra...most R32s are so far behind I cant see them anymore...... :ph34r:

stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it

Everyone can have an opinion mate, did I overtake you at the track recently? Drag you off at the lights? Or are you just jelly?

Stagea's ftw. At least I don't get pulled up every second day, actually I never have in this. Plus it is a lot cheaper than a 34gtr and most of the running gear is the same.

Have you even seen the newer M35 stagea up close? Probably not...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...