Jump to content
SAU Community

What Makes The R33 "ugly" ?


Recommended Posts

R33 series 1 gts/t = ugly

R33 GTR + series 2 gts/t = sexy shizz

R34 = fkin sexy

I personally think the r33's reputation of its looks was horrible because of the series 1 gts/t's, Other than that all the other r33s look fine to me. Matter of taste and opinion. In the end, you own a freakin skyline and thats pretty decent no matter what model it is. if anything im sick of those kents in their commys and falcons thinking their rides are all that, when infact its just an over powered tractor. I mean seriously we should be discussing why people think their commodores are so great, i mean who doesnt own one of them =='

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32333435.jpg

looking at that i would have to say the 33 is the smoothest, sleekest, SLIMEST car of the lot....

It also looks the lowest and is the nicest colour...

In fact i have just gained a whole new love for the 33 shape..

I always though it was a bit baulbous looking as well but beside its brothers its gotta be the sexiest of the bunch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok firstly...stageas? really ? those massive station-wagons? people actually thing they are good looking? i just assumed that whoever was driving it wanted a skyline but had kids...hence the shitty station-wagon version of the skyline. imo Bar the front(which is a skyline front anyway)...those things are ridiculously hideous......

secondly...duckwings are the shit....but the stock s2 spoiler has really grown on me and suits the car now that its been lowered...so im keeeping it.

Lastly , yes an s1 maroon skyline with that rounded spoiler looks almost as bad as a stagea.

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

thanks for the heads up , but IMO(yeah O stands for opinion) stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it. Like another member on here said ..the only reason he got one is because he wanted to the haul the kids around and in spite of its looks a stagea is till better then any other station wagon out there. If I had kids..id buy a Stagea too.

You obviously dont get the point oif the thread...notice the inverted commas before and after the word "ugly"? I personally LOVE the r33 shape..as I have stated before...and cant seem to understand why the general car community consider it the worst looking of the Skylines...hence the start of this thread

Kids these days got no respect..

I'm sure his mum is fat and ugly too, but if someone didn't drive her he wouldn't be here ..

Id imagine someone with over 8000 posts would have some kind of civility as you've been on this forums for sometime....instead you choose to insult my mother....this has made you feel better/prove your point somehow? I'm not sure I quite understand this keyboard heroism, but you have succeeded in coming of as a massive douchebag- congratulations!

Edited by tripsteady
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nissan owners make the R33 ugly.

Especially now as they head into "old age" and the paint wears through and they cop dings etc... They need to be treated with TLC but a lot of the ones I see don't get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a look in your rear view mirror next time you have a 32 behind you and let me know if you can tell wether its an early 90's laser or a 32. I cant.

I have a supra...most R32s are so far behind I cant see them anymore...... :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it

Everyone can have an opinion mate, did I overtake you at the track recently? Drag you off at the lights? Or are you just jelly?

Stagea's ftw. At least I don't get pulled up every second day, actually I never have in this. Plus it is a lot cheaper than a 34gtr and most of the running gear is the same.

Have you even seen the newer M35 stagea up close? Probably not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...