Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just wanted to know whether changing discs on their own is worth while and will provide better braking.

back to the OP - having convinced myself 3 times in the past, 'oh yeah buy those slotted rotors, I want to upgrade the brakes', there's no point, unless the diameter of the disc increases by a significant amount. Advertising promises of better braking through gas disbursement etc, is just that, advertisin, I have noticed SFA difference from just slotted/drilled rotors.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And well the master stopper just looks cool

now we're getting to that heart of the matter hahah, nothing wrong with that as long as you're aware of it and that it isn't going to make the braking difference you're after.

I'm sort of in the same boat as the first poster (with my R34 GTT), in that I'm going to look to grind my disks - but I suspect it is time that they go as they may not be grindable (been on for a while, and I think one has problems..).

If so, and I just do 'ordinary' street driving (and lots of country driving at 110km/h), would I be right in assuming that DBA 42304 (not s) for the front and DBA 4908 for the back would be a good reasonably priced default choice?

From almost worn out shitty front pads and oem rotors, I upgraded to RDA slotted rotors, bendix ultimate pads, stock lines, new fluid, brake master cylinder stopper.

And It made a world of difference and it is DEFINITELY noticeable.

Did the rotors and pads first, and even then, there was a difference in stopping distance, maybe because old pads were just crap.

Then the BMC stopper made my brakes FIRM and a much better feel in braking, no more unresponsive spongy brakes.

From worn out shitty pads to any half decent new pads WILL make a world of difference!

For a street car if your rotors are in good cond the most important things are to replace the brake fluid (probably never been changed in many cases) and get some good pads.

brake cylinder stopper doesn't make a difference ? I found a big difference on R33. It made a much bigger difference during hard braking than braided lines. Both these are there to increase feel so you notice graduations in pedal pressure more directly.

Cross-dilled rotors will do almost nothing and have downsides with cracking. Slotted rotors might make some difference once the pads get hot, but nothing until then. Curved vane will make a difference on track - definitely.

The biggest issue is what pads do you run? Pads can make a MASSIVE difference.

First street upgrade is:

decent pads

fluid

brake cylinder stopper

The friction coefficient on pads tells you how hard they bite. Doubling this will double your braking force for given pedal effort. It will also wear your rotors about twice as quick. This coefficient changes over temperature so choose wisely. The biggest issue is pads. Standard bendix is at the low coefficient end, then ultimate/HPX, then A1RM, then DS2500, then HC+, then...well you don't want anything after that.

You still haven't answered what you use the car for. If it's for track then go buy 355mm 6 pot brakes. If it's street only then stock brakes with pads will be fine.

Edited by simpletool

The way I see it the MC stopper and braided brake lines ( I have both) are of most use in an emergency stop. On the track they change slightly how much pedal and pressure you have to apply until you get to lock-up but in an emergency stop on the road my theory is that they might pull you up that meter or two earlier that might make all the difference.

I doubt any change to brakes would pull you up much quicker on the street. The stock system with decent pads and fluid will easily overcome even 595RSR 235/40/18s on a single hard stop.

However MCS and braided lines will give you more control over exactly how hard you are stopping - so if you practise they will give more control at the limit.

Saying that the suspension and tyres will have a bigger effect on stopping distance.

Does the car ever hit the track?

If no,

- Machine rotors $7 per side

- Use good pads

- Flush brake fluid

Spend the rest of your money on beer & strippers.

Slotted rotors are gaids.. they crack and wear your pads.. If you want mad brakes, upgrade to evo brembos with STOCK unslotted Evo X rotors.. happy days.

Does the car ever hit the track?

If no,

- Machine rotors $7 per side

- Use good pads

- Flush brake fluid

Spend the rest of your money on beer & strippers.

Slotted rotors are gaids.. they crack and wear your pads.. If you want mad brakes, upgrade to evo brembos with STOCK unslotted Evo X rotors.. happy days.

$7 to machine rotors? Madness!

Where did you get them done? I remember once I paid SIXTY DOLLARS PER ROTOR for my R31. Shame I had to get it done on a Saturday and the dude was close to me. I was desperate to get the car running (work reasons).

I bought brand new rotors for $60 each a year later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...