Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alex you mised a q I asked a while back that I was curious on.

 

Person owns a flat.

Body corp finds a prob with building and gets a quote tells every-one that it will be 40K each to fix.

Owner sells prior to the work being done (and thus bill paid)

 

Does this expected bill need to be disclosed? 

or can they do a dog act and dump it on the new owner,.

55 minutes ago, emts said:

Alex you mised a q I asked a while back that I was curious on.

 

Person owns a flat.

Body corp finds a prob with building and gets a quote tells every-one that it will be 40K each to fix.

Owner sells prior to the work being done (and thus bill paid)

 

Does this expected bill need to be disclosed? 

or can they do a dog act and dump it on the new owner,.

sorry man dont stop by here often these days

thats really shady if the owner sold it himself then yes he has to disclose as he is aware if he didnt tell the agent then its a grey area as agents have to disclose what they are made aware of if they didnt know and buyer didn't make their own investigations its a bit of buyer beware 

Having said that i would have thought it would be disclosed in the owners corporation certificate which has to be supplied with the contract or contract is voidable.

 

7 hours ago, blah_blah said:

Can't reply to your comment Hamish

 

But yeah slightly overqualified for bookkeeping lol

Bullshit asshole - I know you want to work for burgers

3 hours ago, alr33x said:

still salty precious one - actually worked out very well that deal but i wouldn't expect you to understand or be interested with all them penny stock transactions catapulting you up the financial standings.

lol

by Alex logic Mark Zuckerberg is currently only worth $124 USD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...