Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thought i better update my time

SAU Nickname: sav man

Car Make and Model: 1989 BNR32 (GT-R)

Circuit Name: Symmonds Plains

Lap time: 1:02.94

Modifications

Engine: RB26

Power: 311rwkw

Suspension: some tenebe crap, HICAS completly removed and locked.

Tyres: Nexen 245/40R18

Brakes: Porsche 6 pot monoblock 355mm rotors Front. Rear standard with Hawk blue.

Body weight: stock - HICAS

also http://www.motorsportstas.com.au/Symmons_Plains.php?sm=4 some info on Symmonds

Edited by sav man
Well after what seems like an eternity to me I'm finally back and marked my return today at Phillip Island with a new PB of 1.47.24. Not too shabby given it is the 1st full track day I have got through in my car since Oct 05 and that the tyres I was on (toyo's) were definitely a good 1.5-2s slower than the bridgestones looking at how much Scotsman could get back on me through the sweepers and under brakes.

Racepace FTW! :whistling:

SAU Nickname: Wogboy

Car Make and Model: 2000 R34 GT-T

Circuit Name: Symmons Plains

Lap time: 1:07.75

Modifications

Engine: RB25DET stock turbo

Power: 225rwkw

Suspension: SK Bilstien group buy

Tyres: Falken RT somethings 235/45/17

Brakes: stock

Body weight: stock

SAU Nickname: AMEC

Car Make and Model: 300ZX Z32

Circuit Name: Wakefield Park

Lap time: 1:09.742 = 8th place on the list

Circuit Name: Queensland Raceway Sprint

Lap time: 0:57.56 = 2nd spot on the list

Modifications

Engine: VG30DETT

Power: 529 RWHP

Suspension: D2 coilovers

Tyres: F: 255/40/R17 R: 285/30/R18

Brakes: Stoptech

Body weight: 1403 kg

Phillip Island

Circuit Distance - 4.44km s

1. JagR33, R33 GTR - 1.46.36 sec

2. Aaron34, R34 GTR - 1:46.51 sec

3. Snowman, R34 GTR - 1:47.17 sec

4. Scotsman, R33 GTR - 1:47.79 sec

5 ferni, R33 GTR - 1.51.35 sec

6. BBGTR, R32 GTR - 1.51.76 sec

7. Roy, R32 GTST - 1.52.00 sec

8. Rowdyr32, R32 GTR - 1.52.23 sec

9. provo, R34 GTR - 1.53.97 sec

10. Ant97GTR, R33 GTR - 1.54.01 sec

Reference Lap Time:

- 1:45.28, GT Production Mazda RX-7

- 1:54.14, APCC Honda S2000 (Aus. Prod. Car Championship)

Phillip_Island.jpg

I was running 1.45s last year at an Alfa day. I can't remember the exact times though... Top of the list for me please...

Also, I ran 1.45.5 around Eastern Creek last year...

I was running 1.45s last year at an Alfa day. I can't remember the exact times though... Top of the list for me please...

Also, I ran 1.45.5 around Eastern Creek last year...

Damn you Aaron, was hoping you woudn't find this thread!!!! :P

But he's right, I did see a 1:45.8 from memory on Racetime at PI, before they deleted all previous event results....

SAU Nickname: archie01 (Archie)

Car Make and Model: R32 GTR

My times:

Calder 22/10/06 1:04.96

Sandown 10/06/07 1:23.58

Modifications

Engine: Cam Gears, single T04z

Power: 320rwkw Calder, 350rwkw Sandown

Tyres: 245/40/18" RE55's

Brakes: Alcon 6 pot fronts, standard rears, Braided Lines, Pads: F - DS3000, R - Endless.

Suspension: HICAS lock bar, Bilsteins, Whiteline f&r sway bars.

SAU Nickname: archie01 (Archie)

Car Make and Model: R32 GTR

My times:

Calder 22/10/06 1:04.96

Sandown 10/06/07 1:23.58

Modifications

Engine: Cam Gears, single T04z

Power: 320rwkw Calder, 350rwkw Sandown

Tyres: 245/40/18" RE55's

Brakes: Alcon 6 pot fronts, standard rears, Braided Lines, Pads: F - DS3000, R - Endless.

Suspension: HICAS lock bar, Bilsteins, Whiteline f&r sway bars.

I've seen a dyno sheet with 380+ kw. What happened to the extra 30 kw?

I remember as we came out of turn 4 and onto the back straight and you were in front of me, I wasn't able to reel you in but you weren't able to pull away either. So I'd say we're line ball on power but you have me everywhere else :D

I can see you in a 32.......and i can see myself in a 34....wanna swap? ;)

Its always satisfying when you can actually keep up with a car in a straight line...always so frustrating to be losing out in a straight line and having to fight to catch them up through the corners and under brakes....lol i can only do it for a few corners before overdirivng and losing even more time :D

Power: 350rwkw Sandown

F#$CK me, no wonder you blew me into the weeds on the straights..... :thumbsup:

I reckon by the 3rd flying lap, my car is down to about 280-285 rwkw given how hot it gets and how much timing is coming out and how much fuel is going in. I'm shooting 3 foot flames on decel when water temps are over 100deg C.

Cheers

Andrew

F#$CK me, no wonder you blew me into the weeds on the straights..... :thumbsup:

I reckon by the 3rd flying lap, my car is down to about 280-285 rwkw given how hot it gets and how much timing is coming out and how much fuel is going in. I'm shooting 3 foot flames on decel when water temps are over 100deg C.

Cheers

Andrew

It's all factory issue for the ducting. The oil temps are not too bad as the oil cooler is in the front bumper and angled for maximum surface area. I've still got my air-con condensor so it blocks most of the radiator at the front.

With power comes heat, so unless I ditch the air-con there's not much I can do apart from doing some work at the bottom of the car to direct some air flow up into the hot part of the radiator.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...