Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thought i better update my time

SAU Nickname: sav man

Car Make and Model: 1989 BNR32 (GT-R)

Circuit Name: Symmonds Plains

Lap time: 1:02.94

Modifications

Engine: RB26

Power: 311rwkw

Suspension: some tenebe crap, HICAS completly removed and locked.

Tyres: Nexen 245/40R18

Brakes: Porsche 6 pot monoblock 355mm rotors Front. Rear standard with Hawk blue.

Body weight: stock - HICAS

also http://www.motorsportstas.com.au/Symmons_Plains.php?sm=4 some info on Symmonds

Edited by sav man
Well after what seems like an eternity to me I'm finally back and marked my return today at Phillip Island with a new PB of 1.47.24. Not too shabby given it is the 1st full track day I have got through in my car since Oct 05 and that the tyres I was on (toyo's) were definitely a good 1.5-2s slower than the bridgestones looking at how much Scotsman could get back on me through the sweepers and under brakes.

Racepace FTW! :whistling:

SAU Nickname: Wogboy

Car Make and Model: 2000 R34 GT-T

Circuit Name: Symmons Plains

Lap time: 1:07.75

Modifications

Engine: RB25DET stock turbo

Power: 225rwkw

Suspension: SK Bilstien group buy

Tyres: Falken RT somethings 235/45/17

Brakes: stock

Body weight: stock

SAU Nickname: AMEC

Car Make and Model: 300ZX Z32

Circuit Name: Wakefield Park

Lap time: 1:09.742 = 8th place on the list

Circuit Name: Queensland Raceway Sprint

Lap time: 0:57.56 = 2nd spot on the list

Modifications

Engine: VG30DETT

Power: 529 RWHP

Suspension: D2 coilovers

Tyres: F: 255/40/R17 R: 285/30/R18

Brakes: Stoptech

Body weight: 1403 kg

Phillip Island

Circuit Distance - 4.44km s

1. JagR33, R33 GTR - 1.46.36 sec

2. Aaron34, R34 GTR - 1:46.51 sec

3. Snowman, R34 GTR - 1:47.17 sec

4. Scotsman, R33 GTR - 1:47.79 sec

5 ferni, R33 GTR - 1.51.35 sec

6. BBGTR, R32 GTR - 1.51.76 sec

7. Roy, R32 GTST - 1.52.00 sec

8. Rowdyr32, R32 GTR - 1.52.23 sec

9. provo, R34 GTR - 1.53.97 sec

10. Ant97GTR, R33 GTR - 1.54.01 sec

Reference Lap Time:

- 1:45.28, GT Production Mazda RX-7

- 1:54.14, APCC Honda S2000 (Aus. Prod. Car Championship)

Phillip_Island.jpg

I was running 1.45s last year at an Alfa day. I can't remember the exact times though... Top of the list for me please...

Also, I ran 1.45.5 around Eastern Creek last year...

I was running 1.45s last year at an Alfa day. I can't remember the exact times though... Top of the list for me please...

Also, I ran 1.45.5 around Eastern Creek last year...

Damn you Aaron, was hoping you woudn't find this thread!!!! :P

But he's right, I did see a 1:45.8 from memory on Racetime at PI, before they deleted all previous event results....

SAU Nickname: archie01 (Archie)

Car Make and Model: R32 GTR

My times:

Calder 22/10/06 1:04.96

Sandown 10/06/07 1:23.58

Modifications

Engine: Cam Gears, single T04z

Power: 320rwkw Calder, 350rwkw Sandown

Tyres: 245/40/18" RE55's

Brakes: Alcon 6 pot fronts, standard rears, Braided Lines, Pads: F - DS3000, R - Endless.

Suspension: HICAS lock bar, Bilsteins, Whiteline f&r sway bars.

SAU Nickname: archie01 (Archie)

Car Make and Model: R32 GTR

My times:

Calder 22/10/06 1:04.96

Sandown 10/06/07 1:23.58

Modifications

Engine: Cam Gears, single T04z

Power: 320rwkw Calder, 350rwkw Sandown

Tyres: 245/40/18" RE55's

Brakes: Alcon 6 pot fronts, standard rears, Braided Lines, Pads: F - DS3000, R - Endless.

Suspension: HICAS lock bar, Bilsteins, Whiteline f&r sway bars.

I've seen a dyno sheet with 380+ kw. What happened to the extra 30 kw?

I remember as we came out of turn 4 and onto the back straight and you were in front of me, I wasn't able to reel you in but you weren't able to pull away either. So I'd say we're line ball on power but you have me everywhere else :D

I can see you in a 32.......and i can see myself in a 34....wanna swap? ;)

Its always satisfying when you can actually keep up with a car in a straight line...always so frustrating to be losing out in a straight line and having to fight to catch them up through the corners and under brakes....lol i can only do it for a few corners before overdirivng and losing even more time :D

Power: 350rwkw Sandown

F#$CK me, no wonder you blew me into the weeds on the straights..... :thumbsup:

I reckon by the 3rd flying lap, my car is down to about 280-285 rwkw given how hot it gets and how much timing is coming out and how much fuel is going in. I'm shooting 3 foot flames on decel when water temps are over 100deg C.

Cheers

Andrew

F#$CK me, no wonder you blew me into the weeds on the straights..... :thumbsup:

I reckon by the 3rd flying lap, my car is down to about 280-285 rwkw given how hot it gets and how much timing is coming out and how much fuel is going in. I'm shooting 3 foot flames on decel when water temps are over 100deg C.

Cheers

Andrew

It's all factory issue for the ducting. The oil temps are not too bad as the oil cooler is in the front bumper and angled for maximum surface area. I've still got my air-con condensor so it blocks most of the radiator at the front.

With power comes heat, so unless I ditch the air-con there's not much I can do apart from doing some work at the bottom of the car to direct some air flow up into the hot part of the radiator.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...