Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

I was wondering if anyone can help me out with this I have searched and found nothing So

I have a R33 RB25 det Power Fc and I wanted to know if I could Run it in my R34 GTT neo RB25.

I know there have been people running GTR FC's in Rb20 and 25's

But I wanted to know if this could be done from the 33 version into a 34. I understand there would be wireing changes needed.

But Has anyone had any success or actually done this ??

All help would be much appreciated guys thanks in advance

Ash

No you can't. The R34 ECU plug is completely different to the R33.

I mean, you can if you want to re-pin 60-70 pins but it's not worth the hassle. You wont have an issue selling your R33 PFC.

best ECU in world, :special:

well for $600 secondhand and being plug and play it is.. :ph34r:

Dude ...[emoji14]Link ecu, Halltech, Motec, AEM, Adaptronic

1000 times better in nomather what subject, closed loop idle, boost control, knock control, boost by gear, boost by throttle ect ect and they do also offer plug-ins. Okay a lot more expensive, but do the math, ecu + bigger maf + decent boost controller, and if you map yourself, nistune or pfc you need the software ... You come really close to the price off a decent ecu.

Just my 2 cents... [emoji6] [emoji1]

  • Like 1

Dude ...[emoji14]Link ecu, Halltech, Motec, AEM, Adaptronic

1000 times better in nomather what subject, closed loop idle, boost control, knock control, boost by gear, boost by throttle ect ect and they do also offer plug-ins. Okay a lot more expensive, but do the math, ecu + bigger maf + decent boost controller, and if you map yourself, nistune or pfc you need the software ... You come really close to the price off a decent ecu.

Just my 2 cents... [emoji6] [emoji1]

Plus for the OP it is NOT plug and play (wrong plug on car for the PFC).

I'm not a high roller, using a siet bok adaptronic :)

Considered halaltech many times, but realised it's worth 1/2 my siet bok.. so no lol

The new software, eugene, of adaptronic, has taken the ecu to a much better package imho then the wari software. They also provide a new range soon [emoji3]

Software is one thing however when you think about it, your motor (assuming RB2xxxx) needs a total of 12 drivers to make it fully sequentially however the Select range offers 8.

That means injectors are paired into 3 sets for semi sequential firing and also same goes for spark.

Not the end of the world but inefficiencies are had.

Software is one thing however when you think about it, your motor (assuming RB2xxxx) needs a total of 12 drivers to make it fully sequentially however the Select range offers 8.

That means injectors are paired into 3 sets for semi sequential firing and also same goes for spark.

Not the end of the world but inefficiencies are had.

How many drivers does power fc have?

Powerfc and Nistune are literally the same neither is light years ahead they are still the same age hardware wise.... we are one of the biggest Nistune dealers and yes i love them but to trash PFC is foolhardly... the pfc is still the best bang for buck rb25 ecu on the planet....

  • Like 3

Ok so I'll sell my pwr fc and buy a fc 4 the neo.

Who's running a nistune? And what power figures are u getting?

I haven't been around 4 a while, but it's Darkhalf who's behind the nistune right.

We deal with pete @ nistune (all the orders) but im pretty sure they are 50/50 partners MATT and PETER.

Skys the limit with nistune and PFC as we can now measure up to around 1500hp with HPX airflow meters

  • Like 1

We deal with pete @ nistune (all the orders) but im pretty sure they are 50/50 partners MATT and PETER.

Skys the limit with nistune and PFC as we can now measure up to around 1500hp with HPX airflow meters

How you going along with that MAP kit for Nistune? I remember you were toying with the idea bout 4~5 years ago

But with the MAP kit, would it take into account IAT as well? Could be primitive, as IAT increases load increase which naturally means you'll read heavier loads resulting in lower timing and more fuel (which will over richen as you want to compensate high IAT with less fuel as there's less oxygen but not necessarily a bad thing keeps shit cool)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...