Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Piggaz said:

Do you plan on building this soon? How hard do you rev it? Any other changes apart from the snail? 

Its gonna be interesting to see the difference, especially in the real world.

Still on the factory gearbox?

Will build when it pops.  Probably rev to 8500.

It has getrag behind it now with diff. No other changes to motor aside from turbo. 

37 minutes ago, usmair said:

Will build when it pops.  Probably rev to 8500.

It has getrag behind it now with diff. No other changes to motor aside from turbo. 

Do you at least have decent headstuds? the OEM ones are known to stretch and lift heads

3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Do you at least have decent headstuds? the OEM ones are known to stretch and lift heads

yes. head gasket, studs, springs, valves etc etc have been upgraded. Basic stuff is done

Edited by usmair
  • Like 1
On 05/02/2018 at 8:31 PM, usmair said:

I ended up with 1.05 as it didnt look like the 1.45 would fit on current mani.

Should be on this week with tune next week or so.

Nice, I don't really think the 1.05 should be a show stopper at all - especially on a "mild" 2.6, I'd say the turbine speed would be the key thing to keep an eye on.  Very interested to see what the difference is from the 1.05 EFR8374!

 

Good luck :)

After reading through this thread you all convinced me to not get a Garrett GTX3582R and instead I just purchased purchased a efr8374 1.05 ex gate from gcg turbos yesterday. Also brought a 6boost split pulse manifold and 50mm turbosmart pro gate.

Can’t wait to institute in the coming weeks.

  • Like 2

Guys, what do you think the below setup? Would it be laggy?

1. efr9180 1.05

2. Fullrace manifold running twin gates

3. Rb26 87mm forged CP piston 9:1 compression with tomei rods

4. Ported head with tomei type b cams

5. Greddy intake

6. Getrag with 4.1 final drives

I hv been searching for results of 9180 on stock 2.6l displacement but couldnt find much info.  what i am really after is whether it is going to be laggy.

Fuel will be 97 but running on wmi.

Thanks

 

 

From guys that have gone from -5’s/2530’s to a 9180/1.05, it behaves like a pair of -5’s to 4000 rpm then the 9180 will walk away from it.

If an 8374/1.05 is on 500 rpm earlier than a pair of -5’s then how much later can a 9180 be?

*using -5’s as a yard stick.

How hard will you be leaning on it?

It won’t be the most responsive setup in the world but you are talking about a 94 lb/minute turbo all in.

1 hour ago, gzro said:

Guys, what do you think the below setup? Would it be laggy?

1. efr9180 1.05

2. Fullrace manifold running twin gates

3. Rb26 87mm forged CP piston 9:1 compression with tomei rods

4. Ported head with tomei type b cams

5. Greddy intake

6. Getrag with 4.1 final drives

I hv been searching for results of 9180 on stock 2.6l displacement but couldnt find much info.  what i am really after is whether it is going to be laggy.

Fuel will be 97 but running on wmi.

Thanks

 

 

30psi by 5000rpmish. Will have actual results next week

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...