Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, gzro said:

Would a 0.92 ar work on stock displacement? Plus vcam?

Really reluctant to build a 2.8l engine when the current engine is still healthy,  current engine is <15k after rebuilt..

Straight up, you basically have 3 incompatible requirements:

1) EFR9180 power levels

2) Want to be able to get good pull from <4000rpm

3) An RB26

Remove the thing from that list which missing out on will bother you the least.  DON'T go with a .92 housing especially on a 9180, its not going to make it worth while.  It won't spool the way you want and it will also choke the compressor, worst of both worlds.

 

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

The 9180/0.92 is kind of retarded. If you want the power that the 91 mm compressor can flow/give, you’re not going to get there by choking up the turbine side. So now you have a larger compressor and turbine to turn making it lazier than it needs to be THEN won’t make the power because it’s choked.

the 8374/1.05 makes much more sense. No, it won’t be lazy/laggy because of the larger AR rear.

Big compressors and small AR rears “to chase response” DONT work. 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, gzro said:

Would a 0.92 ar work on stock displacement? Plus vcam?

Really reluctant to build a 2.8l engine when the current engine is still healthy,  current engine is <15k after rebuilt..

Theres been 6 votes for the 8374 mate take the advice.

Its a beast of a turbo! 

 

.92 is fail on pretty much most EFR's & you'd also find going .92 and v cam you probably wouldn't be able to swing the intake cam a whole lot due to the turbine choking. 

8374/1.05 & V cam is an absolute killer combo on a 26! Make 450+kw and be getting your face peeled off by 4000rpm. 

It will make 100+kw more than your current setup and will be on sooner, power delivery will be much more linear and there will be alot more of it everywhere. 

How much more could you ask for?! 

7 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Theres been 6 votes for the 8374 mate take the advice.

Its a beast of a turbo! 

7 votes   :D

 

 

LOL.  Thanks all. 

Got the hint, loud and clear.
I need to sell the 9180 and get 8374 back... That is after I have confirmed that 9180 is not a good idea on stock displacement, which you all kindly did.

The 9180, vcam and stuffs are all meant for a 2.8l engine that I planned earlier - sole reason why I sold the 8374 and got the 9180.  2.8l is still an option albeit an expensive one and i would rather not as the current engine is still very healthy and reasonably new.

Vcam is not going in so soon. I need a set of piston with valve recess as the current cp pistons do not have them.

I am currently running poncam type b. For the vcam, I bought hks 264 step 2 exhaust cam. It has a slightly bigger lift (10mm vs 9.15mm). Would you recommend swapping the hks in while maintaining the tomei type b intake cam when I swap over to the ported head?

3 hours ago, Lithium said:

Straight up, you basically have 3 incompatible requirements:

1) EFR9180 power levels

2) Want to be able to get good pull from <4000rpm

3) An RB26

Remove the thing from that list which missing out on will bother you the least.  DON'T go with a .92 housing especially on a 9180, its not going to make it worth while.  It won't spool the way you want and it will also choke the compressor, worst of both worlds.

 

Response over power, definitely....

37 minutes ago, joe89 said:

What's the safe boost level for 8374 and 2.6 capacity till 8200? I don't have speed sensor :/ 

Can’t really put a pressure on it. 

How does the head flow? What cams? How restrictive is the cooler? The list goes on and on.

Buy one, put it in, wire it up. It’s not expensive.

Edited by Piggaz

Disappointing result with my dyno session on Wednesday due to a couple of issues. Got to 360kw at the wheels on 20psi on 98 and had clutch slip at peak torque between 4500 and 5500 rpm so we stopped there, egts are quite high too. New clutch time. I think a coppermix comp will hold an 8374 on a 2.6. I like the sprung hub and centre plate anti-rattle That the orc 1000F and osg R3C don't do. Clutch is just worn out as it used to hold much more with the -5s.

 

Had a look at the logs and at 360kw the emtron is reporting a calculated air mass flow of 450g/s (60lb/Min) at a pressure ratio of 2.4. Turbo wheel speed is 108k rpm. I've triple checked the scaling maths so I believe that number. PIGGAZ you might be able to help me out, the scaling on turbo speed  input on the kv8 is 3.43. The compressor map is saying I should be at 93k ish rpm so I think the stock bovs might be passing or I have a decent boost leak. Will replace clutch, check the boost piping and head back to wind her up.

Very impressed with the emtron software. Once you set up all the logging pages it's very powerful.

IMG_20180228_182858.jpg

5a987e5692cc2_turbospeed.thumb.png.2229f3c811b33fc39a962b7f42f8d54c.png

download_20180302_071659.jpg

 

download_20180302_072818.jpg

download_20180302_073136.jpg

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
22 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointing result with my dyno session on Wednesday due to a couple of issues. Got to 360kw at the wheels on 20psi on 98 and had clutch slip at peak torque between 4500 and 5500 rpm so we stopped there, egts are quite high too. New clutch time. I think a coppermix comp will hold an 8374 on a 2.6. I like the sprung hub and centre plate anti-rattle That the orc 1000F and osg R3C don't do. Clutch is just worn out as it used to hold much more with the -5s.

 

Had a look at the logs and at 360kw the emtron is reporting a calculated air mass flow of 450g/s (60lb/Min) at a pressure ratio of 2.4. Turbo wheel speed is 108k rpm. I've triple checked the scaling maths so I believe that number. PIGGAZ you might be able to help me out, the scaling on turbo speed  input on the kv8 is 3.43. The compressor map is saying I should be at 93k ish rpm so I think the stock bovs might be passing or I have a decent boost leak. Will replace clutch, check the boost piping and head back to wind her up.

Very impressed with the emtron software. Once you set up all the logging pages it's very powerful.

IMG_20180228_182858.jpg

5a987e5692cc2_turbospeed.thumb.png.2229f3c811b33fc39a962b7f42f8d54c.png

download_20180302_071659.jpg

 

download_20180302_072818.jpg

download_20180302_073136.jpg

Didn’t see that you asked me a question, mate. Bin the stock recirc valves. There is no reason why they should still be on the car. Put one of those turbosmart units on the comp cover, turn it all the way to hard and see what it does. ?

14 hours ago, Snara said:

And why u are disappointed? Its 670hp at the engine on just 20psi. Very nice.

Just spool seems a little too weak. What are your spec? Engine, cams? ar92?

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Mate send scotty an email I’m sure he’d be more than willing to clear things up for you .

11 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Disappointeded by the clutch not holding.

The plan was to max out the 8374 on e85 but had to hold off.

Power is good, but turbo speed is a fair bit higher than I expected it to be at 360kw. Piggaz my question was around what your turbo speed input scaling is set to in your emtron to make sure I've got it right.

New clutch and new/remove bovs and I'll hit the rollers again.

Nothing crazy. 1.05 a/r, 2.62L, poncams type B, kelford beehives springs. Running a 12 watt 4 port Mac valve that is controlling really well. Have linearised it so 0-100% on boost control output corresponds to 15-70% duty of the valve, which is the effective response range at ~13.5v

Ahh that score is on E85?

When u have 14.5psi?

Here is my results 

EFR 8374 1.05 rear 

Nitto 2.7

heavily ported head

4” dump in to 3 1/2 “ exhaust 

FullRace Manifold  twin 38 mm tail gates

e85 and all supporting mods

The car feel and dives awesome 

graph is showing old -5’s 

 

27CD8775-9B84-4E58-961E-A0E60B6C8447.png

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...