Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So looks like it worked a treat, cathode side on the +ve terminal.

Also noticed the SSR isn't running as hot anymore, explains why they were all dying after some time. When I got back home after the drive with @PLYNX and my mate, I was actually only running on one pump as I previously had 2x SSRs running side by side but without heatsinks. I decided to convert to a single SSR with a large heatsink for simplicity, and that's when I noticed the issue with my setup.

Anyhow, I found this diagram from another brand name SSR and they specify that all inductive loads must be suppressed by a fly back diode.

images.png.0fe3e90de01c13094e2d1ce341a4c042.png

20191013_181637.thumb.jpg.49f2684cdc3dfda20bc92b761ef29d63.jpg

Running at 90% 

Will start to lower it soon when my laptop is charged and keep dropping it till the fuel pressure starts to drop and raise it by 10%

 

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, Looney_Head said:

Hi Dose, do you have the part number for the diode you used? i need to do this for my SSR before i cook another one...

This is the one I used :)

https://www.jaycar.com.au/diode-1n5822-schottky-40v-3a-do-27/p/ZR1048

 

  • Like 1

Hi Johnny,

Love the build, it gives me the much motivation needed to get into my 33.. I am really keen to know more about the details of your PWM setup, any chance you are you able to provide a wiring diagram on how you set yours up? Size of wiring and fuses etc? There so much conflicting info on the interwebs, however, it seems like you have refined the setup nicely.

Cheers

@R3N3 wiring diagram is pretty much this:

images.png.0fe3e90de01c13094e2d1ce341a4c042.png

Output 1 is +ve battery
Output 2 goes to your fuel pump(s)
Input 3 is +ve IGN
Input 4 is the PWM output from your ECU

Battery -> Output 1, just regular 8GA audio wiring. Used a audio style 80AMP ANL fuse.
Output 2 -> goes to a fuse block, with 2x 30AMP fuses, used decent gauge wiring to the fuel pumps

Fuel pump side, used 2x Schottky 40V 3A diodes, cathode side on the positive terminal of the fuel pump. Remember that current travels from +ve to -ve, but voltage the other way around.

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

@R3N3 wiring diagram is pretty much this:

images.png.0fe3e90de01c13094e2d1ce341a4c042.png

Output 1 is +ve battery
Output 2 goes to your fuel pump(s)
Input 3 is +ve IGN
Input 4 is the PWM output from your ECU

Battery -> Output 1, just regular 8GA audio wiring. Used a audio style 80AMP ANL fuse.
Output 2 -> goes to a fuse block, with 2x 30AMP fuses, used decent gauge wiring to the fuel pumps

Fuel pump side, used 2x Schottky 40V 3A diodes, cathode side on the positive terminal of the fuel pump. Remember that current travels from +ve to -ve, but voltage the other way around.

Legend. Thanks

14 minutes ago, R3N3 said:

Legend. Thanks

Shit just noticed I made a mistake, 

OUTPUT 1 to pump

OUTPUT 2 to battery.

Ironic the wiring diagram was in my face and I still managed to cock it up. Shows males can't multitask 

37 minutes ago, robbo_rb180 said:

Johnny how have you found having the pumps PWM controlled? lower/consisstant fuel temps?

Keen for bathroom updates.

Good question, I went on a 4 hour drive not long ago, I should download that data and have a look :)

 

I'll probably let it sit at room temperature, and used my MAPP brazing torch to sear it... will post pics when I cook it, going Korea first LOL.

@PLYNX hahaha yeah, I might need tyres soon and also I have 2x cars I need to tune this Saturday, trying a 3rd place for dyno hire and waiting for them to get back to me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...