Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

 

18 hours ago, morboost said:

which 3" exhaust do you have?

It’s a fabbed 3in downpipe to a 3in ISR (cheap) catback. It’s all straight pipe and 1 can at the rear. 
 

I have found several examples of the same turbo making more power on less boost with 98 RON or similar (non ethanol) fuels. But, maybe I am wrong or getting bad info. 19 psi seems like a lot for that power. 

1 hour ago, Tillis3 said:

 

It’s a fabbed 3in downpipe to a 3in ISR (cheap) catback. It’s all straight pipe and 1 can at the rear. 
 

I have found several examples of the same turbo making more power on less boost with 98 RON or similar (non ethanol) fuels. But, maybe I am wrong or getting bad info. 19 psi seems like a lot for that power. 

Pull off your front timing cover and see if the intake & exhaust cam is in the right spot vs. the crank pulley

Easy check

  • Thanks 1
On 3/31/2024 at 11:08 PM, Kinkstaah said:

Also yeah, that is a reasonably good result for petrol at 19psi. I'd say this is working as one would expect. If you dialled in 25psi into it it may be interesting to see what it'd do, but because you're on 93 (hello USA) the answer is probably knock.

Almost all of the results you read here are on E85, which makes dramatic differences.

98RON (EU) = 93AKI (NA). We also have 94AKI in Canada which is 101.5RON. In the US. they have E85 unlike us in Canada. 

Sorry yea - I know 93 = 98 = Premium, I only said Hello USA because that's how people use the term, nobody down under refers to anything 93 :D

But I was wrong, and it was Canada, aye. So hello, better USA.

19 hours ago, TurboTapin said:

98RON (EU) = 93AKI (NA). We also have 94AKI in Canada which is 101.5RON. In the US. they have E85 unlike us in Canada. 

damn no e85, the only reason Australia has it GM (holden) did a deal with caltex (a fuel company) to supply a e85 for a flex fuel domestic model car. The car was a dud as owners where using 30% more fuel in a non performance application and just started filling the car with regular unleaded. The car company went broke and the fuel company stopped selling it. Thankfully another fuel company started selling e85 as the performance benefits had been realised in boosted application its ozzy 98ron with 15% ethanol, loves boost and timing.

1 hour ago, morboost said:

damn no e85, the only reason Australia has it GM (holden) did a deal with caltex (a fuel company) to supply a e85 for a flex fuel domestic model car. The car was a dud as owners where using 30% more fuel in a non performance application and just started filling the car with regular unleaded. The car company went broke and the fuel company stopped selling it. Thankfully another fuel company started selling e85 as the performance benefits had been realised in boosted application its ozzy 98ron with 15% ethanol, loves boost and timing.

We don't have E85 at the pump due to our winters. It wouldn't be pretty. But most of our petrol is an E15 mix. 

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

I have done a lot of reading but still just as confused as when I started!!

RB25det (neo)
Forged internals, all the other good stuff.
Haltech ECU.
Plazmaman plenum with factor runners, DBW 68mm throttle body.
98 pump gas
Should be capable of revving to 9k.

Going to be used for mostly road/odd track day, 500WHP target. Looking at a Artec manifold with G30-770 but with the reading I have done, a lot of people recommend twin scroll. Not a lot of options with the G series when going to twin scroll. Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

With response being important for drivability on the road, not top-end HP (while still important), what do people recommend for turbo? I like how easy the V-band g-series look and am keen on a g-series but not 100% sold.

Also, recommendations for an intercooler. Historically I've always run cheap large ones but looking for something smaller and more efficient, capable of flowing the 500WHP.

Thanks

On 23/06/2024 at 1:19 PM, BiZbAiRd said:

Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

odd thing for a turbo manufacturer to say, the proof if there, twin scroll always performs better, sure non twin scroll and twin scroll you'll end up at the same overall peak power, however a street car/track car needs a wide powerband unlike a drag car.

In terms of intercooler, a good one goes a long way. For reference (I've posted it somewhere here the data) I had an older HDi Core (pre dates the GT2 style cores, they seem decent!) and my runs were peaking over 60 degrees Celsius, went to a Plazmaman Pro Series 76mm core and temps dropped down to the mid 30s. Similar ambient temp, similar motor build, same turbo setup, same exhaust system, mostly same IC pipework.

On 23/06/2024 at 3:19 PM, BiZbAiRd said:

Not a lot of options with the G series when going to twin scroll. Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

I've never seen Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll - they have twin scroll options for all their G and GT series turbines from the 30 series up.  

What kind of dyno are you expecting to be making 500whp on?  So far it sounds more or less like you're doing a G30-770 kind of setup, and realistically an open housing will be good response etc

Hi Lithium,

I have heard a couple people say, Garrett say with the smaller G-series twin scroll is not require and I have assumed this is the case, based on the lack of twin scroll availability. Garrett only do a T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r, which I feel is too big for an RB25 for my use case? Yes, I was certainly thinking the G30-770 but was concerned about the lack of twin scroll.

The 500whp isn't the critical part, it's a 'build for this power' and hopefully get there. More important are drivability and response.

Regards

18 hours ago, BiZbAiRd said:

Garrett only do a T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r, which I feel is too big for an RB25 for my use case? Yes, I was certainly thinking the G30-770 but was concerned about the lack of twin scroll

G30-770 with their 1.06 a/r twinscroll housing is an awesome combination.  Will be over the moon with that on a properly configured RB25

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, BiZbAiRd said:

Would you expect to see 500whp from the g30-770 1.06a/r twin scroll T4? I  feel like it's to big for a primarily street application?

Its just big enough for what you are trying. I would not go any smaller. your compressor map is right in the middle. I have a g35-900 for my 30/25 build and looking to get 550-600 with out going above 1.5 bar 

  • Like 1

Thanks @waxracing

Turns out G30-770 T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r isn't available for reverse rotation. So really, the only real question is, will the G30-770 v-band .83a/r produce 500whp on pump gas? If it's unlikely, should I go to G30-770 1.01a/r, G30-900 .83a/r or G35-900 .83a/r? Or any other combination...

Well if you look at the compressor map I would say that the g35-900 will do it alot easier and be in a better efficiency range. In regard to throttle response and boost threshold, I doubt you would feel the difference but obviously there will be one. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...