Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I have the opportunity to buy 2 different cars for the same price and I would like your opinions. I am in Calgary which has a lot of snow but I have a wrx for that. So here we go,

1995 Silvia S14 Kouki,
RB26DETT swap,
RB25 trans,
lots of mods mostly bolt ons,
23,000 original km

1991 Skyline R32 GTST,
RB25DET NEO swap,
RB26 twin turbos,
RB20 trans,
protuned,
Brand new paint job worth 5k,
144,000km on body, less than 50,000 on engine.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479699-need-help-choosing-car/
Share on other sites

The S14, every day.

Things that are wrong with the R32:

  • WTF? Why would anyone fit GTR twins onto a NEO? FFS!
  • WTF? RB20 gearbox? Will die. Will die soon. Will need RB25DET gearbag instantly.
  • 144000km, likely to be 280000km wound back. Anyone who believes the 144000 should ask me about this lovely piece of Sydney Harbour property I have to sell.

Things that are wrong with the S14:

  • Not much. RB26 not the best choice, but at least you can f**k off the twins, fit a big single and peel the tyres off the rims.
  • S14 a little less nice place to be (inside) than an R32, but only just.

Even though the S14 has Mac strut front suspension, there are enough problems with the R32 upper arms that the S14 will be easier to make handle properly. It's also a little lighter and a proven hoon mobile. Just do it.

  • Thanks 1

Okay just a question tho, what’s wrong with fitting twins on the neo? I’ve looked it up a bit and couldn’t find much, but the owner of the r32 is the owner of a very reputable jdm shop that is known for doing some crazy custom work. I think I’m a little biased and trying to justify buying the 32 over the s14 haha. I’ve always wanted a skyline 

32 minutes ago, Brayydon said:

crazy

Operative adjective quote for clarity.

Twins make no sense. Adding twins onto a single turbo engine is a backward step. Literally any other solution would have been more sensible.

 

I wore out an RB20 manual with.....an RB20. They are a light box and do not enjoy lots of torque. Expect a short life expectancy with an RB25 with any sort of extra boost.

There's no cons on the S14 except that it's not a Skyline.

I wouldn't trust those kms on the S14 either. Car is 25 years old. Where has it been all that time?

The only problem with S14s is that the diff will be viscous LSD at best, and the driveshafts have tripod style CVs (not quite as good as proper CVs). But these things can be easily changed.

The Skyline combo makes me think that somebody had a box of leftover bits and made a car out of them.

If this is your first Jap turbo car, I'd probably be looking at one that has only been lightly modded.  We all crawl, walk run......

The S14 would be OK, but its heavily modded, if you don't have a big toolbox or intend to circuit race then its outta your league imo.

Personally I'd go the S14, but if you're really keen on a skyline I agree with others - just wait until the right one comes up.

I was looking for 2.5 years and test drove a bunch before I got what I wanted. Fairly clean and low kms with a few light mods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...