Jump to content
SAU Community

Installing a Lift in the Garage, will this type of lift work?


kevboost7
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, soviet_merlin said:

Hah, I was going to post a picture of one as a joke. You are ruining your point by picking the most ludicrous EV there is. Surely even the states aren't bonkers enough to see them as a regular occurrence. I'd also love to see someone put one of those on jack stands. Or maybe not, it sounds stupid and possibly dangerous. They are humongous.

True, but it’s also not unusual for people to own and drive HD diesel or gas trucks which actually have comparable ground pressure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is there a lot of carry on about the pinch welds? You do not jack on the pinch welds. You jack on the jacking points, that just happen to be located at the pinch welds. The jack doesn't touch the pinch weld. The jack touches the jacking point either side of the pinch weld.

If you're lifting at the jacking points with anything other than the original jack, you simply have to make sure that you pick up on the jacking points, not on the pinch weld. I always struggle with understanding people's apparent lack of understanding on this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Why is there a lot of carry on about the pinch welds? You do not jack on the pinch welds. You jack on the jacking points, that just happen to be located at the pinch welds. The jack doesn't touch the pinch weld. The jack touches the jacking point either side of the pinch weld.

If you're lifting at the jacking points with anything other than the original jack, you simply have to make sure that you pick up on the jacking points, not on the pinch weld. I always struggle with understanding people's apparent lack of understanding on this point.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It's not that complicated but I still see a lot of cars with severely damaged pinch welds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll never jack from my sills be that at the jacking point or not.  The diff from the back or the subframe from the front.  I lift my  car on the hoist from the chassis rails which I'm comfortable with as the hoist pads span across the whole width of the rail meaning the force travels through the vertical sections of the rails.  My chassis rails are dented from previous owners and their mechanics using smaller jack/hoist pads however....

I use the subframe at the back same as the person in the picture is pointing to (not my finger....) -

Trolley jack placement - RB Series - R31, R32, R33, R34 ...

I'm contemplating making a steel jacking point that uses the existing threaded holes in the chassis and the rear subframe mounting point something like this-

image.thumb.png.bf2b835453900771cad7d81246739ff2.png

There is a step in it which complicates it a bit but would make me feel a little safer if I ever took my car to a tyre fitter or something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not use the jacking point? Designed to carry the load. All the other mentioned points are not. The subframe is not intended to carry concentrated load from the top of a jack/stand. The diff bushes are not meant to carry that load either (not that stops me from jacking under the diff if I need to - I just don't like it because I'm an engineer who can picture what it is doing to the bushes in mind as I do it). The subframe mounting points being index fingered above are also not really meant to carry point loads from a jack or stand, and you would have to obtain or make an adapter to fit there to avoid causing damage - same as you need for the jacking points to avoid rolling the seam.

There is really no safe place on the subframe to put a chassis stand. The best spots available are the lower inner suspension arm pivots, as they are strong and intended to carry the vertical load, and a jack stand will go there without too much risk of wanting to fall off. Well, narrow headed domestic jack stands will anyway. Big heavy workshop stands not so much. And the lower arm pivots are not always convenient either.

The jacking points are ideal for supporting the car on stands because they are mostly completely out of the way of just about anything you want to do under the car with very little risk of the car falling off - provided you have the right adapter on the top of the stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went under the car last night and realized that my pinch welds/sills are completely f**ked. They are all bent and folded over. Can i still use those points? just the metal area next to the pinch welds? 

And can those pinch welds be fixed by bending them back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

I went under the car last night and realized that my pinch welds/sills are completely f**ked. They are all bent and folded over. Can i still use those points? just the metal area next to the pinch welds? 

And can those pinch welds be fixed by bending them back?

I'd watch a couple of youtube videos of people bending the pinch welds back. It won't be perfect so at least you'll have an idea about what level of repair you can expect and what tooling is involved. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

I went under the car last night and realized that my pinch welds/sills are completely f**ked. They are all bent and folded over. Can i still use those points? just the metal area next to the pinch welds? 

And can those pinch welds be fixed by bending them back?

Bending them back is possible but it will work harden the metal guaranteed. To avoid that you need to anneal with heat but that's a can of worms involving heat treatment and all of that fun stuff. The problem with completely bent/folded sills is that even if you don't bend them back they almost certainly will have lost strength because it starts rusting easily. Theoretically the correct way to fix this is to reconstruct the sill like so: https://blog.garage-yoshida.net/archives/1926

The other "correct" way is to drill out/cut the old welds for the sills and replace them with a new OEM assembly but those are long discontinued unfortunately.

I have folded over the pinch welds on my LS400 learning the lessons I'm talking about now (never buy a Powerbuilt U-jack, those things are garbage) but in my case the fold wasn't too bad so I just used some pliers to bend it back and call it a day. You may not be so lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2022 at 9:43 PM, joshuaho96 said:

Bending them back is possible but it will work harden the metal guaranteed. To avoid that you need to anneal with heat but that's a can of worms involving heat treatment and all of that fun stuff. The problem with completely bent/folded sills is that even if you don't bend them back they almost certainly will have lost strength because it starts rusting easily. Theoretically the correct way to fix this is to reconstruct the sill like so: https://blog.garage-yoshida.net/archives/1926

The other "correct" way is to drill out/cut the old welds for the sills and replace them with a new OEM assembly but those are long discontinued unfortunately.

I have folded over the pinch welds on my LS400 learning the lessons I'm talking about now (never buy a Powerbuilt U-jack, those things are garbage) but in my case the fold wasn't too bad so I just used some pliers to bend it back and call it a day. You may not be so lucky.

I just looked up a powerbuilt u-jack, in theory that seems like a great tool cause it'll save you time and hassle of having to put the jackstand on. Why do you say its bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

I just looked up a powerbuilt u-jack, in theory that seems like a great tool cause it'll save you time and hassle of having to put the jackstand on. Why do you say its bad?

You might be interested in having a look at these - 

https://rennstand.com/

https://jackpointjackstands.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of those are porn. I worry about the multi-piece construction of the Rennstand. I see a few ways for that to go wrong on people. And I ponder if you can only make the other one work with certain trolley jacks. But they are both the realisation of idle ponderings I have done myself when staring at the shitful combination of things I have to hold my car up over the years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

I just looked up a powerbuilt u-jack, in theory that seems like a great tool cause it'll save you time and hassle of having to put the jackstand on. Why do you say its bad?

The jack is garbage. There's no control when releasing the jack so it crashes down hard on the jack stands. My 60 USD Harbor Freight chinesium jack is better in that regard. The design of the saddle is also awful. It doesn't engage the pinch weld properly so it's still going to crush it. The whole thing is a huge finger crushing hazard because you have to manipulate the jack stand to get it into the cutout.

22 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Both of those are porn. I worry about the multi-piece construction of the Rennstand. I see a few ways for that to go wrong on people. And I ponder if you can only make the other one work with certain trolley jacks. But they are both the realisation of idle ponderings I have done myself when staring at the shitful combination of things I have to hold my car up over the years.

I agree the jackpoint stand looks a lot better but they're all super expensive and are really only necessary for cars where the engineers shrugged and decided there was no need to put in a factory-approved central floor jack point. The F80 M3 is one of those cars where I'm genuinely debating whether I should buy a set because the logical rear jack point (rear diff) has fins running all along the bottom and the lower control arm mount works but is still annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

are really only necessary for cars where the engineers shrugged and decided there was no need to put in a factory-approved central floor jack point.

What, like most cars, including our Skylines? We jack up on the diff, but we probably shouldn't. The front crossmember is really not designed for jacking. It has no crush resistance, slippery rounder profile. Everything that should scream "do not jack here".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

What, like most cars, including our Skylines? We jack up on the diff, but we probably shouldn't. The front crossmember is really not designed for jacking. It has no crush resistance, slippery rounder profile. Everything that should scream "do not jack here".

jacking points on an r33 gtst | Skyline Owners Forum

As far as I can tell the front crossmember and rear diff under the main case is explicitly designated as the floor jack point. I use a rubber pad and try to make sure the car isn't loaded with a bunch of random garbage. As far as I can tell it works fine. If it's listed in the factory service manual presumably they've done some math and made sure there's an adequate safety factor. The F80 M3 rear diff is truly impossible to put a floor jack on:

attachment.php?attachmentid=2330937&stc=1&d=1591387851

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

What, like most cars, including our Skylines? We jack up on the diff, but we probably shouldn't. The front crossmember is really not designed for jacking. It has no crush resistance, slippery rounder profile. Everything that should scream "do not jack here".

We clearly differ greatly on this matter. In my opinion the diff is a perfectly good location to jack from as is the front crossmember.

At the end of the day each to their own and for me my car will NEVER get jacked by the sills. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/11/2022 at 6:32 PM, Shoota_77 said:

We clearly differ greatly on this matter. In my opinion the diff is a perfectly good location to jack from as is the front crossmember.

At the end of the day each to their own and for me my car will NEVER get jacked by the sills. 

I'm pretty much in agreement here. With a floor jack it's the front crossmember marked with an X, or the rear crossmember near the diff, but not the actual diff housing. I mean the housing is strong enough, you just dont need to. Then jack stands on crossmember mounting points - I stay away from any sill or body area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

No sense of adventure I just Jack it up from the sump and the rear bumper bar and put the stands under the foot wells in the floor pan 

Do you use inverted speaker carpet spikes on top of the jack stands? (asking for a friend).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That’s the one. Yeah, the seller has confirmed the base ECU is from a manual car.    To be honest, I’m only worried about the TCS light being illuminated due to registration here in NL - unsure on rules. Back in Japan, we weren’t allowed to have any permalit error-related lights (or so my shaken guy said).    Looks like this Nistune is the way to go then, appreciate it GTSBoy, and the others that chimed in.   
    • There is no impact. Granted, mine is in an R32, so there are a couple of other things going on, but.... my auto ECU came with the auto engine. Bolted it up to the manual gearbag and suddenly the TCU is just spare parts along for the ride. The ECU doesn't (really) care. Nistune is the fixer of all wrongs. I have no ABS CU or traction control. That would be a recipe for fault codes and permalit check engine light. But....just go into the diagnostics pages and turn them off. Presto, ECU no longer cares that it can't talk to those CUs. If you're worried about the TCS light being lit on the dashboard for some rason (that I am not catching right now), then.... remove the globe. No-one needs the TCS anyway. That is what throttle control is for. I certainly don't have it - haven't missed it in 12-13 years or so. Never wanted it.
    • Thank you Duncan, and I will say, before reading GTSBoy’s response, this was more or less my logic.  I can’t argue with that. The part I couldn’t get past was thinking that the speed sensor in the 30A was replacing whatever was in the AT transmission before, and therefore completing the prior circuit.   The other thing that I failed to mention was that, across all HKS documents, despite mentioning compatibility with AT R34s, there is no mention of a different pin. These Japanese instructions appear to predate early man, so there’s always room for error.    I’m speaking with the seller of this R34 GTT ECU with Nistune at the moment. It’s pretty cheap and eliminates the possibility of me soldering my fingers to the ECU when installing the board myself. I am yet to confirm whether the base ECU is from an MT or AT car, so the question is: When using an MT ECU in an AT car, and then losing the TCU part, are there any other implications?   Another thing I’m not sure of is whether I can pass local regs with a TCS warning. Of course, swapping between ECUs is a fairly simple task.
    • yeah i have done it on my efr8374.. no issues.. sent it to OCD Works in the US.. locally i know hi spool industries do the mod as well
×
×
  • Create New...