Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so what are they like? i'm guessing they will be better than mine, but by how much?

of course they're better than yours... lol... even if they aren't as if I am going to concede that!

will get some pics up soon

  • 1 month later...

bitchin! and you got the car back!! extra bitchin! :)

Honda Euro cut-off is freaky! my dad's 335i lights ain't that sharp, wondering if they are starting to purposefully unfocus them just a *touch*

looking damn awesome man :kiss: that is nice :D

Been waiting a while for pics :)

Just sourced my retrofit projectors, out of a J30 infinity(some american car, think it's the equivilant of a Q45 over here,

dual projectors, one with cutoff shroud inbuilt :) and autolevelling :) can't wait to finish mine off

Top effort on yours though :)

are you still working on the clear indicators?

I've just bought a set of d-speed ones for mine, but i've done what you did, i was going to source side markers to replace the orange in the clear plastic, but haven't found the right size fit yet

hey vincent, not doing clear - I like the orange indicators - clear makes them look too much like a 33 :)

be careful with using US lights - the cut off will be backwards because they are LHD.

The cutoff for a RHD should look like this (ignore the full stops):

_________

............... \______________

The cutoff for a LHD will look like this:

............... ________________

............../

-----------

the higher lhs of the light on a RHD headlight allows for the camber on the lhs of the aussie roads...

hope that makes sense!!

hey Ronin,

Yeah, i've noticed that :S I took them apart yesterday, due to it being a jap import the US guys have welded splitters in the middle top of each light :S, i guess to not blind other drivers, so I'll cut them out and it hopefully should restore the lighting to a good standard,

Also noticed that the R32 headlight glass sucks :D I'll have to either get it ground down, to make it all smooth or go PVC, although I'd prefer to keep it original looking :)

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

S2K is definitely bigger. I had a pair but there was no way they would fit into the R32 housing.

I don't know the dimensions of the S2K projector (sold them), nor the R34 housing - sorry can't help there.

you'll just have to see by breaking them open and/or visualising it......

  • 7 months later...

Hmmm i wander to get this:

600x450-2007120400005-2.jpg

600x450-2007120400003-2.jpg

600x450-2007120400004-2.jpg

23,800 YEN = $247 AUD but thats not including shipping (Would have to get someone to import it like Slidewize)

That and HID coversion *drools* Even without the HID conversion and some Phillip Crystal Vision's would probably look mint as well!

Wander if it fits a GTS-T? anyone read japanese? Translator service doesnt really give that info lol

Edited by cosmokram3r
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...