Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Did you notice any improvement in fuel economy?

Cheers,

Fabio

I bought the K&N filter today so I will see how it goes.

On the M35 airbox there is a slot at the leading edge of the bonnet for cold air but on the front edge of the airbox there is another pannel that can remved opening up the front of the airbox. I have noticed on the V35 that this section is also open and sealed to only let cold air in. Would removing this section help improve the airflow and potential power? post-41854-1199513559_thumb.jpg

im managing to squeeze out 350per tank just before the light comes on.

and thats squirting it every chance i get - with a tuned 230kw.

I was only getting 200 out of a full tank previous - and driving like a grandma..

im managing to squeeze out 350per tank just before the light comes on.

Have you worked out L/100kms now? And from memory there's at least 20L left in the tank when the light comes on. Your previous figures are about the worst I've seen!

Have you worked out L/100kms now? And from memory there's at least 20L left in the tank when the light comes on. Your previous figures are about the worst I've seen!

nah, i probably never will, my screens been disabled when i took the GPS rom out and replaced it with an eManage.

yeh when the emanage was installed it was only tuned to get me to the dyno - anything above 4000rpm would just misfire and streams of black smoke out of the exhaust.

Cihan fixed it, so i could drive up to EDGE motorworks for a tune, and i've been getting heaps out of a tank now. with twice the power i do like my car now.

lol.... how so?

More air = more fuel

Well you claimed it was better!

Benefits!

#1 Noticeable ease in which the car accelerates and builds revs (even with the OEM dump pipe still on).

#2 More power. Definitely more power.

#2 Whilst the car does use more fuel when accelerating at a decent rate, economy has increased considerably. Particularly whilst cruising!

...I have MUCH better fuel economy thus far (will continue to test as the batch of fuel may have had something to do with it), ...

http://www.m35stagea...c.php?f=20&t=16

You tell me :nyaanyaa:

Was it really the fuel in the end?

Edited by ironpaw

In my mind, better efficiency = better economy BUT only if measured under same driving conditions. So for example, the new suction pipe teamed up with big exhaust should return better economy if driven as the same speed or rate of acceleration as before. The hard part is to not use the extra "efficiency" all the time which would wipe out most/all the economy gains :)

I am averaging 11.9L/100km on the highway, and around 14-16L/100km around town with the following set up;

RS-Four S Manual

3" Turbo Back Exhaust

Cooling Pro Stealth Intercooler

Nistune Computer

12psi Boost

(185kW @ All fours)

Well you claimed it was better!

As quoted

"Whilst the car does use more fuel when accelerating at a decent rate, economy has increased considerably. Particularly whilst cruising!"

I do a lot of cruising.

How do you drive it? If you drive like Craig your economy will go to shit. If you cruise around 100kph, it will be better.

Doesn't your emanage have two settings eco and race? When you say heaps how many KMs are you getting? I'm doing dump pipe and front pipe fairly soon and I might consider doing the emanage afterwards...

specially if I can have two settings economical and race... my basic understanding is that emanage is able to control pressure of turbo as well as fuel, air etc....

Please let me know if you recommend that for someone that 90% of the time drives very easy and usually doesn;t go above 3000 rpm.

Cheers

nah, i probably never will, my screens been disabled when i took the GPS rom out and replaced it with an eManage.

yeh when the emanage was installed it was only tuned to get me to the dyno - anything above 4000rpm would just misfire and streams of black smoke out of the exhaust.

Cihan fixed it, so i could drive up to EDGE motorworks for a tune, and i've been getting heaps out of a tank now. with twice the power i do like my car now.

Whats wrong with your right foot?

The Emanage doesn't have a boost controller built in.

If you want low down response, stick to smaller sized highflow wheels.

Dont go much bigger than the stock wheels unless you want to spend the coin on a gearbox build, injectors, fuel pump, intake and 3 inch exhaust.

Thanks Scott

I mean I'm doing the dump pipe and front pipe to improve the turbo lagging I don't really want to make my 1800 kg car into a race car but I wouldn't mind taking the turbo pressure up to it's limits with the stuck fuel pump.. (I believe turbo can go to 1.2 bar with the current fuel system)

If I install a boost controller don't I need to tune air and fuel to work accordingly with the new pressure? I though emanage would do all that for me at once nor two devices...

I saw some emanage units on ebay in US going quite cheap that's why I was wondering doing that....

Nothing wrong with my foot the other 10% surely it's to take the most of my engine.... commuting to and from work + suburb driving takes most of my driving...

Question: did you keep the cat in your front pipe? the guy from the shop was pointing that it's illegal etc... but how often are you gonna run into this sort of check???

Cheers

Whats wrong with your right foot?

The Emanage doesn't have a boost controller built in.

If you want low down response, stick to smaller sized highflow wheels.

Dont go much bigger than the stock wheels unless you want to spend the coin on a gearbox build, injectors, fuel pump, intake and 3 inch exhaust.

Edited by FHF

You had better do some searches, there is not that much information on here as only 3 or 4 cars have been successfully tuned so far. Im guessing that unless you can find a competent Emanage ultimate tuner up in Sydney, you will have to trek down to Melbourne for your tune.

The emanage ultimate wont improve your off boost economy by much, the stock map is pretty efficient. M35's run rich on boost, by leaning it out a bit there is a fair bit more power for free.

The stock turbo isnt reliable at the stock boost level, let alone bumping it up, save for a steel wheel highflow.

I have heard of heaps of Sydney-siders running catless front pipes, Down here were too scared of the plod. A 4 inch body 100cpsi metal cat will flow well over 300awkw I know for a fact. :)

In Sydney I haven't been checked once and I ran straight pipe for over 2 years. Was loud as hell. So long as you don't do anything stupid like sit in Liverpool crispy kreme carpark on fri-sat night. I only seen them check volume twice. Once on the old PAC. The other was near the airport. Still no emission check.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...