Jump to content
SAU Community

Stagea Fuel Economy


RUS

Recommended Posts

Been doing a bit of light load/ highway tuning of my 260RS. Leaned it out a fair bit. Last tank was 12L/100km (half highway, half around town). I'm a bit disappointed to be honest. I reckon it can do better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats pretty bloody good!

i have put mine back to stock ECU, stock boost - and curious to see how it behaves. did new plugs and cleaned AFM meter last week, and trying to keep it off boost as much as i can.

a point of interest is my recent dyno tuning showed the stock fuel map really loads fuel in between 2500 and 2500rpm, which is commonly where i shift - so try short shifting it to keep it out of that area (for RS4S owners).

what annoys me though is the way the fuel gauge barely moves for the first 100km's of the tank, then drops rapidly - to 3/4 - then it takes about 350km to get to half - and then the last half a tank just EVAPORATES over the next 100km's! it's quite deceiving! just when you think you're doing ok out of this tank, BOOM, it laughs in your face!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats pretty bloody good!

i have put mine back to stock ECU, stock boost - and curious to see how it behaves. did new plugs and cleaned AFM meter last week, and trying to keep it off boost as much as i can.

a point of interest is my recent dyno tuning showed the stock fuel map really loads fuel in between 2500 and 2500rpm, which is commonly where i shift - so try short shifting it to keep it out of that area (for RS4S owners).

what annoys me though is the way the fuel gauge barely moves for the first 100km's of the tank, then drops rapidly - to 3/4 - then it takes about 350km to get to half - and then the last half a tank just EVAPORATES over the next 100km's! it's quite deceiving! just when you think you're doing ok out of this tank, BOOM, it laughs in your face!

thats usually a problem with the fuel "leveler" thingy in the tank.. another one of the guys told me that when i run ethanol it should actually fix this issue(mine was doing it to) so as im on e85, it seems to have cleaned the contact part on the leveler... now mine doesnt play tricks any more.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After driving to a rally on the weekend, I topped up the tank so I'm now running about half BP Ultimate, and about half United 98 Premium (which was giving rubbish economy). Driven like a granny 90% of the time, so far 8.3km/L, looks to be 600+ km per tank. Amazing what staying off boost can do for economy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for comparison my temporary vehicle, a 1994 Toyota Camry 3L V6 is doing 11.4 L per 100km around town (and of course it doesn't have a turbo). I was getting 12 - 15L per 100 from my C34 and have been warned it will get worse with the RB30!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just managed to see a big improvement in fuel economy with the install of the shift kit.

New best is a 9.3L/100km from Goulburn to West Ryde. This was sitting on an average 116km/h on the freeway.

Also got 10.3L/100km on a Canberra - Jindabyne (2 trips to Perisher) - Goulburn trip.

Very happy with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just managed to see a big improvement in fuel economy with the install of the shift kit.

New best is a 9.3L/100km from Goulburn to West Ryde. This was sitting on an average 116km/h on the freeway.

Also got 10.3L/100km on a Canberra - Jindabyne (2 trips to Perisher) - Goulburn trip.

Very happy with this.

Well that's a surprising benefit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey All

One of my first posts since I took delivery of my C34 RS4S. Its a great car and goes surprisingly well. Its such a sleeper, its great! :)

Thought it would be interesting to post my first two fuel consumption figures as my car is absolutely stock standard. Not a single mod except a turbo timer.

Both figures are mixed hiway and city driving plus its a new car for me so I have been giving it a good squirt in between.

First 58L Caltex 98 to 498kms = 11.6 L/100km

Second 55L Caltex 98 to 510 = 10.8L/100km

I imagine if I was going easy and not getting on boost much it would drop to 9L/100 easy.

I'm pretty happy with that as just about any car of a similar size (commodore wagon, camry, liberty) will use the same or more. Only difference is when the RB lights up all the others will be in the rear view mirror! :)

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just got 12.5ish from my last tank+$50 worth (about 720kms from $130 fuel) and thats running 95ron and semi highway (actually delivering pizzas lol, lots of 60kms cruising and minimal stopping till you get near ppls houses)

i think im going to get a wideband and a simple piggy back so i can lean out my cruise and light load a bit more (seeing as im pretty stock)

if only i could justify a nistune at the moment :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I filled my tank and got about 220ks out of it before the fuel light came on...

I wonder if that could be related to my plugs fouling so badly the car literally would not start?

Me thinks that's not necessarily a good indication of a Stag's fuel consumption :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I filled my tank and got about 220ks out of it before the fuel light came on...

I wonder if that could be related to my plugs fouling so badly the car literally would not start?

Me thinks that's not necessarily a good indication of a Stag's fuel consumption :)

definitely something wrong, check for boost leaks and go from there

o2 sensor will cause bad fuel consumption but not that bad

could also be leaking injectors or even bigger injectors (jap fitted) that just run with the stock ecu (but i doubt this)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my first posts since I took delivery of my C34 RS4S. Its a great car and goes surprisingly well. Its such a sleeper, its great! :)

Thought it would be interesting to post my first two fuel consumption figures as my car is absolutely stock standard. Not a single mod except a turbo timer.

Both figures are mixed hiway and city driving plus its a new car for me so I have been giving it a good squirt in between.

First 58L Caltex 98 to 498kms = 11.6 L/100km

Second 55L Caltex 98 to 510 = 10.8L/100km

I have averaged somewhere between those two in my rs4s for the last 4 tanks.

Keep boost guage in the neg, driving these things slow is freaking hard though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, nice effort Dasic1.

Compared economy before and after my tune.

11.1km/L getting there on the freeway/highway and 12.4km/L getting home.

All up 260kms travel + nearly 4 hours on the dyno and used just over 1/3 of a tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just filled up my second tank of BP 98 in my 'new' C34 s2 RS4V, 11.6L / 100km.

Pretty happy with that, mostly freeway driving but with some acceleration and start stop.

Fuel consumption was the last thing that I was anxious about, but it seems to be not much worse than my HR31 (10.9-11.3 on my typical commute).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slap a 460L into the car, send its mum.  
    • So last night pulling away from the lights, I lost power for about 1 second. Bit weird, but I kept driving... 5 minutes later the pump completely dies. When I tried to start the car, the pump won't even prime.  I left the car for about an hour, tried to start it and it all appeared fine. Pump primed, car started, got the fuel pressure I should have.... Start driving home, 5 minutes later it dies again. I'm stuck in a shit spot this time going up hill with a car right behind me, so I just let the car continue to turn over while praying to the fuel pump gods. After about 2 minutes of turning the engine over, the fuel pump came back to life and I got home (only about another 5 min away).  So I've been digging around online, it seems like the 525 fuel pumps really don't like to be run at 100% all the time. I've found quite a few examples online of people killing their Walbro 525 pumps within about a year of usage when they are run without PWM.  So, my pump is an Aeroflow 525 (AF49-1057) and I've been running it at 100% without PWM. I'm thinking the Aeroflow 525 didn't like being run at 100% and has burnt itself up.  I really am sick of dealing with fuel pump issues, my current thoughts are -  1. Use a Walbro 450 and run it without PWM. It seems like these pumps hold up pretty well to being run at 100% all the time. I only make about 350kw and can't see me making any more power any time soon so this is probably a fine option.  2. Get a Walbro 525, run it with PWM. I know doing this will annoy me as I feel like with only 350kw, its extra expense that I don't "need" and I'll be thinking the whole time while setting it up that I should have gone with option 1. I know I'll be happy with this option when its setup and running, its only the initial setup frustration and cost as an issue.  3. Get a Walbro BKS1001 brushless pump. This is the fu*k it I'm already going PWM, might as well go full retard. This option just seems better in every way, with the only downside being cost. But I don't know much about this pump so I could be wrong.  Happy to get everyone's thoughts before I go digging around in the fuel tank again. 
    • Doing it this weekend. For sure this time. Thank you forum gods.  And im running map sensor now with the haltech. Still have the AFMs attached to the mushroom dome shaped air filter things
    • Actually, it is probably pretty legit. I mean, it's still woke feminazi bullshit academia, but you would have to agree that it is very likely that there would be a correlation between wanting a loud exhaust and scoring at the unpleasant end of the scales for dark triad personality traits. The fact that they found it didn't correlate with narcissism and only with psychopathy and sadism definitely shows that the loud exhaust thing is more of a "f**k you" than a "look at me", and I reckon that rings pretty close to most of the dickheads who take it to the extreme. Remember, this is correlation with tendency to be closer to one end of a personality trait scale than the other end. Of course someone who is at the literal opposite end of the psychopathy scale is going to be so considerate of others that they wouldn't even think about wanting to upset anyone with a loud exhaust. So the finding isn't that "you are a psychopath". Just that you score more towards that end of the scale than someone who doesn't like loud exhausts (on average, not necessarily even for specific individuals).
    • Blitz ER34 at some point hopefully, should be allowed in Gr3 if they do.
×
×
  • Create New...