Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I still seem to be the anomaly here.

Driving to Canberra and back the lowest tank for me was 8L/100km.

Maybe it's because I don't usually use the aircon?

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

Screw you all!!! According to the stats I've been gathering, I'm averaging 14.87l/100kms. :(

I've got a full exhaust, FMIC, PowerFC and a GReddy EBC - must be the short trips and heavy right foot. I don't speed anywhere, but I love the feeling of acceleration, so that's killing my fuel economy.

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

That was on Potenzas. They were pumped up at the time but nothing ridiculous.

Only mod that I believe may have made a difference to fuel economy is the runner spacer. Ever since I chucked that in it seems more than happy to sit in 5th/overdrive from about 70kmh and up. Actually seems to have a lot more torque from say 70kmh to 90kmh than before.

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

Disconnect it & use up a tankfull, see if any change?

______________

Here's stats from 3 fill ups on my C34 S1- stock everything except no cat. 'Z' 95 fuel.

05/03/12: 10.72/100km

08/03/12: 9.96/100km... first time ever getting into 9's

13/03/12: 10.6/100km... this one is the most common result

  • 1 month later...

My 34 S1 RS Four stock everything except no cat, burns about 20-23 L/ 100 km in city, and about 15-16 L / 100 km on highway. 95 fuel. I drive not faster than 110 km/h, but I like to speed up by pressing the gas pedal to the floor. Our fuel is terrible, so If I tucked your petrol, consumption would be less.

Edited by muratti

I still have the same o2 sensor in from when i bought the car. Still get 600k's before fuel light comes on. Still give it beans most days. Car is now @ 308,232klms.

NEVER buy Matilda fuel. It was PULP but found performance was down and only got 450klms to a full tank. Shell 98 all the time, everytime for me.

Edit: I totally forgot to say - At 180,000 k's I did pull the o2 sensor out. I put it in a small tub of fuel and used a new paint brush to clean the sensor tip, in through the little slits too.

Edited by Jezboosted

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

EDIT: Wait, you have a VQ. You could be right on the price.

Edited by Cowboy1600
  • 3 weeks later...

I got 12.47l/100km on my very first tank with quite a bit of spirited driving, was testing the car out when i just got it.

Then 11.3l/100km on my second tank, these are with 85% suburban driving. :rolleyes:

Only mod is a cat-back but on a manual hence the low figures?

Just filled my S1 manual RB30/25. I have been driving normally - changing up at 2 -2500 revs, the odd boost on the motorway and it took 62.65 L for 448km so about 14L per 100km (mostly short trips less than 10km - four or five about twice that).

71 litres for 570 odd km's. Getting on for 150,00 km's mileage now. Have cat fuel filter fitted but seems to make little difference. Upwards of 200 km's on first quarter tank, open highway, promised much but failed to follow through in city driving. I expected better combined based on past performance.

BTW: MY rank should be VQ25DET, to whom that matters.

Edited by STAG250

I'm monitoring my fuel consumption following the road tune. It seems quite reasonalble concidering the changes I have made. Its hard to measure properly, because the Mrs trips are not long, but I'll have a crack.

Staqg250 - your Rank is based upon your post count. You start as a RB20e then progress ir RB20de, det, RB25de, det etc etc up to RB26dett with something like 10,000 posts.

A few of us smart cookies just changed it to something more suitable for M35 owners.... :P

Ok finally had a gentle driving week in my car and I've come back with 13.4l/100km, all highway. Alot higher then it used to be before the tune but with low level mods it's probably about right.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've gone back to Shell 98 octane and I am getting far better fuel economy now than when I was running Caltex Vortex 98. Last time I let the tank get down to near empty I had done 500km, and it took 61L to fill the tank. Now after a few tanks of the Shell fuel, I was on 275km at a half tank of fuel before I filled up this morning. I mostly drive country roads/highway going to and from work here in Canberra, all the while in the midst of the daily tradie grand prix.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...