Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I still seem to be the anomaly here.

Driving to Canberra and back the lowest tank for me was 8L/100km.

Maybe it's because I don't usually use the aircon?

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

Screw you all!!! According to the stats I've been gathering, I'm averaging 14.87l/100kms. :(

I've got a full exhaust, FMIC, PowerFC and a GReddy EBC - must be the short trips and heavy right foot. I don't speed anywhere, but I love the feeling of acceleration, so that's killing my fuel economy.

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

That was on Potenzas. They were pumped up at the time but nothing ridiculous.

Only mod that I believe may have made a difference to fuel economy is the runner spacer. Ever since I chucked that in it seems more than happy to sit in 5th/overdrive from about 70kmh and up. Actually seems to have a lot more torque from say 70kmh to 90kmh than before.

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

Disconnect it & use up a tankfull, see if any change?

______________

Here's stats from 3 fill ups on my C34 S1- stock everything except no cat. 'Z' 95 fuel.

05/03/12: 10.72/100km

08/03/12: 9.96/100km... first time ever getting into 9's

13/03/12: 10.6/100km... this one is the most common result

  • 1 month later...

My 34 S1 RS Four stock everything except no cat, burns about 20-23 L/ 100 km in city, and about 15-16 L / 100 km on highway. 95 fuel. I drive not faster than 110 km/h, but I like to speed up by pressing the gas pedal to the floor. Our fuel is terrible, so If I tucked your petrol, consumption would be less.

Edited by muratti

I still have the same o2 sensor in from when i bought the car. Still get 600k's before fuel light comes on. Still give it beans most days. Car is now @ 308,232klms.

NEVER buy Matilda fuel. It was PULP but found performance was down and only got 450klms to a full tank. Shell 98 all the time, everytime for me.

Edit: I totally forgot to say - At 180,000 k's I did pull the o2 sensor out. I put it in a small tub of fuel and used a new paint brush to clean the sensor tip, in through the little slits too.

Edited by Jezboosted

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

EDIT: Wait, you have a VQ. You could be right on the price.

Edited by Cowboy1600
  • 3 weeks later...

I got 12.47l/100km on my very first tank with quite a bit of spirited driving, was testing the car out when i just got it.

Then 11.3l/100km on my second tank, these are with 85% suburban driving. :rolleyes:

Only mod is a cat-back but on a manual hence the low figures?

Just filled my S1 manual RB30/25. I have been driving normally - changing up at 2 -2500 revs, the odd boost on the motorway and it took 62.65 L for 448km so about 14L per 100km (mostly short trips less than 10km - four or five about twice that).

71 litres for 570 odd km's. Getting on for 150,00 km's mileage now. Have cat fuel filter fitted but seems to make little difference. Upwards of 200 km's on first quarter tank, open highway, promised much but failed to follow through in city driving. I expected better combined based on past performance.

BTW: MY rank should be VQ25DET, to whom that matters.

Edited by STAG250

I'm monitoring my fuel consumption following the road tune. It seems quite reasonalble concidering the changes I have made. Its hard to measure properly, because the Mrs trips are not long, but I'll have a crack.

Staqg250 - your Rank is based upon your post count. You start as a RB20e then progress ir RB20de, det, RB25de, det etc etc up to RB26dett with something like 10,000 posts.

A few of us smart cookies just changed it to something more suitable for M35 owners.... :P

Ok finally had a gentle driving week in my car and I've come back with 13.4l/100km, all highway. Alot higher then it used to be before the tune but with low level mods it's probably about right.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've gone back to Shell 98 octane and I am getting far better fuel economy now than when I was running Caltex Vortex 98. Last time I let the tank get down to near empty I had done 500km, and it took 61L to fill the tank. Now after a few tanks of the Shell fuel, I was on 275km at a half tank of fuel before I filled up this morning. I mostly drive country roads/highway going to and from work here in Canberra, all the while in the midst of the daily tradie grand prix.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...