Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The boost drops off a fair bit up top.

303kw on about 22psi droping back to 19/18psi is a decent result, but it doesnt seem that much different to the g2.5 in terms of response.

The g2.5 made close to that power running 98 on only 20psi didnt it? and pretty close to 200kw at 4000rpm as well

Edited by Mitcho_7

Yeah it's looking like the turbo I'll be after. Want to hit 300rwkw or near enough and hopefully shoot above with e85 if it's ever readily available where I live.

Was gonna use stock manifold but after looking what Stao has said and the Dyno graphs I think I will look at getting a 6boost or brea manifold, depending what is available to me

The temptation to go external gate is there, but I think I'll stand by internal gate

same turbo just pump 98 internally gated. Only shows bit more responsive on paper, but on road its very different to the G2.5. Further response gain will cost top end power unless going external gate.

How ever small differences do adds making a pretty big difference looking back to the old G3. So just have to keep on working at it.

Results from the newer SS2 prototype on Pump 98 internally gated in bolt form. It made final of 302rwkws and did actually manage 200rwkws by 4000RPMs. Pretty sweet to drive on road. At this stage that every HP its getting is based on a trade off of some response. Probably only a tinny bit more room to play with. I will trail one more wheel on it in about a week time.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Wow I'm excited. Glad I sent it back for updates.

What is the difference between this and the other wheel you will be testing next?

Different profiled wheel blades, also complete with a bigger turbine housing.

I've made one more billet wheel with minor alterations to the hub that I like to get some result off.

Just over-layed new Ss2 against old ex gate 307 result and original 315 int gate result on paper.

New one is impressive. New vs 307 are identical from 4500 to redline. 307 makes more around 3700 but dips at 4100 then they meet up.

Original 315 makes less from 33-5500 of up to 60hp then only makes a bit more to redline compared.

Excellent result

Stao,

Any hope in a twin scroll internally gated turbo making somewhere over 300rwkWs on 98 & full noise around 3500 to 3700 rpm?

Here's an example of what the EVO boys use:

http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=tp&Product_Code=ATP-VEVO-039&Category_Code=NEW

The idea of running twin external gates etc.. too much money & space used up.

Just put hi-lighter over it. Forgive how rough it is etc.

Yellow is original 315 result

Blue is 307 ex gate

Green is new one with .82 rear

photo-12.jpg

Maybe Stao can get proper comparison sheet when he try's next wheel

Edited by t_revz

Stao,

Any hope in a twin scroll internally gated turbo making somewhere over 300rwkWs on 98 & full noise around 3500 to 3700 rpm?

Here's an example of what the EVO boys use:

http://www.atpturbo....tegory_Code=NEW

The idea of running twin external gates etc.. too much money & space used up.

If that turbo was on decent boost before 5500rpm I would be supprised

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...