Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

+1

It wasn't easy to get off the line- first run i bogged hard and the next I fried the tyres. I think I'm going to need a fair bit of seat time to get the launch right!

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

Block up BOV helps.

The launch won't affect you trap speeds much most 1-2mph the better you launch better 60ft you trap speed will be lower

But yes it will affect you et I think its for every 0.1 quicker off your 60ft it's 0.2 off your et

So you will need a 2.0 60ft and you will be in the 12.8 but proberly 113 or 114mph

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

SS2 FTW!!

comp.JPG

This is the latest G3 turbocharger. It has stepped down back to a 56T from 58. I've focused it on better throttle response and transition response.

The prototype about is built in ball bearing. It felt pretty good on road comes on boost with very light throttle. hitting the dyno again on Wednesday and see how it goes.

Yes it has stepped down to 56T. No point going for a 58T if majority don't have a setup and a engine for that extra power. This one was focused on throttle and transition response. It makes an great every day road turbocharger within the budget.

This casting is in steel as usual.

I'm dreaming of the day you trim down the turbine to something under 80.... I think that would work better for response again.

The sl2 wheel is 61mm with a mid 70s trim. You saw the response on that vs your ss2 when they were running the same compressor... Just do eeeet

Well it made 30kws difference in power with less boost compare to the L2 turbine. Also peeks boost at the exact same RPM which is pretty interesting (Do have slightly lower RPM to Boost ratio before that point, result overlay at page 351)

This turbo needs to be able to work internally gated, So reducing the trim on turbine end will probably hurt that. Small trimmed turbine might work ok on smaller SR and Rb20 engines, When you are bored of the SS1PU and ready for a high mount I can trim one for you to your recommendations.

You just need to tell me what housing to supply, as I will be buying the Tial housing soon.

At the moment I was going to buy a .64 suit GT28, but if you want me to get a GT30 spec housing just let me know. Yet the GT30 are 60mm 84 trim, so we might be better off using the .64 GT28 housing anyway so we can profile it up. The GT30 housing would need a sleeve which I am not too confident in doing.

Can you tell me the specs of your highflow turbine? From memory its a 60mm but different to whats in a G3?

Welcome to A Brand new all better and all mightier ATR43G3 turbocharger. The Older 58T version is now retired.
comp.JPG

This turbocharger have out performed the older profile of the G3 in both peek power and response. Both turbochargers had roller bearing cartridges installed.

Thin Yellow and Red (18psi) is the latest G3
Thick Yellow is the older 58T G3

This turbocharger stopped making power at 376rwkws @ 23psi.

atr43g376rwkw.jpg

atr43g3boost.jpg

Congratulations. That new turbos certainly do produces a wide spread curve, making 240rwkws @4000 rpms. It would be a hell lot of fun on road. Great to see the improvement stao. Good work. :thumbsup:

Stao,

Are these results comparable? Ie. your new setup is on an aftermarket highmount manifold and externally gated, did you test the old profile G3 on the same setup or is this new result vs the old stock manifold/internal wastegate result?

Highmount/external by looks, i want to see internal gate 56T vs 58T on stock manifold, thats what most people have/buy..

Also going back to the 56t, originally you where saying the 58t needed cams for more power from memory,

but going back to 56T and still giving samish results, have you actually run out of turbine flow?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done this both ways, I'd use the original loom & swap plugs on the engine side as you'll usually end up changing a lot of those anyway. Series 1 is usually non ABS which requires wiring which I can't remember how to do as haven't done it for over 15 years. The auto inhibitor is easy to bypass or in the meantime you can put it in neutral & unbolt it & tape it somewhere in the bay haha, then just wire reverse lights. I'd go straight to aftermarket ecu. A few basics are built in ignitor coils & reverse the CAS wiring, sort the plugs for whatever injectors & IAC-you can use an adaptor for the neo type otherwise the s1 will still work, use the knock sensors that suit the loom & it'll be pretty much running.  
    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
×
×
  • Create New...