Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Would that design not create a lot of turbulence with the return right after the turbine?

I was going to mention that but thought i would sit back and see how it went :)

Being at right angles to the turbine flow it stands a chance of being pretty bad.

But, if it turns out to be bad, the concept can still be valid. Because Stao can always have the relationship between the WG and the housing fixed, he can come up with a suitable dump pipe that will allow the WG re-entry to be further down and it can be a standard item he can sell with it. The best bet would be to make it like the cheapy split dumps for Nissan housings with the return down near the floorpan bend in the main dump. When you assemble it you just present the dump to the turbo and WG flanges and do everything up (provided there's enough room to swing the necessary spanners.

The wastegate entry being at a right angle doesn't cause as many problems as one would assume. At least not in my application. Stao welded my gate off the housing like that, but it has no problems with boost control at all, though my tuner and I both thought it would be an issue. Mine is venting to atmo though.

I'm not worried about boost control. I'm more concerned with the disruption to the flow patterns of the turbine exit flow. A Garrett engineer once told me (and several others, to be sure) that the very best turbine exit is a nice, smooth, conical expansion from the turbine diameter up to the proper dump diameter. Shallow cone angle preferred (obviously) but sadly in the real world everything is compromised by how much space is available. But the rest of his message was that anything that disrupts that flow field after the turbine costs flow through the turbine, which ultimately simply comes back to increased back pressure for the same amount of power and less power able to be taken from the exhaust energy. OEM wastegates, like the Nissan one, direct the WG flow across the turbine flow (because the flap directs the flow that way). And it works....but it is one of the reasons that people like to be able to go external gate - so they can get rid of the disruptions in the turbine exit flow. Yeah, yeah, better boost control and all that too. But having the WG flow across the turbine flow is a pretty crap thing to copy if you can avoid it.

Clearly Stao intends this housing to just go where the factory one was and hook up to factory flanged dumps pipes, and so he has little choice in the matter if he wants it all to fit in. But my point was merely that if it turns out to suck in any way, he can still use (most of) the idea.

And now that I think about it, a small tweak to the design of the prototype he showed above would make it suit the split dumps really well. Just move the WG return to the location where the factory WG is so that the gas is kept separate from the turbine flow in the housing, Bob's your uncle. You could even put the divider into the housing proper, remove the projecting divider from the dump pipe and get a more reasonable seal between the two chambers. Probably need to make your own gasket, but that wouldn't hurt.

I agree GTSBoy, I just don't believe people understand high velocity airflow very well.

Imagine the airflow is water and you will perhaps realise the flaws in that design a little better.

Hey I want one of those on my SS2 rear housing but I think if you give the flexibility of being able to weld the pipe in anywhere we like and just build ports into the housings would be great.

Well it doesn't have any room any where else for plumb back. Thats pretty much the only spot that can be plumbed back with. Alternatively I can make them with a bit of a dump pipe, that will make the plumbing much easier.

Less talky, more "run that sucker up on a dyno and see what happens" :)

This.

Do it with a G3 so we can see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

I will make some thing better for the dyno testing. This one was just to see how do able it was. Even tho it looked crap, that was alot of work.

Here's some thing better looking: I've restored a T04Z which some guy was about to throw out into the dump. It had a bent shaft, warped turbine ring grove, balancing was out 300% (funny how it was sold like that and no wonder it was very noisy). Plus some inexperienced mechanic stripped it and damaged the thrust pin and bearing caging. Good thing is the original bearing cartridge didn't look to bad. Other wise I will not be able to restore it.

Its also fitted with our SS3's .70 comp housing and a split pulse .84 turbine housing:

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

side.JPG

Far as I know it will be going to a GTR and make some very lazy KWs, likely it will be back for the VNT module upgrade in near future.

What size is the compressor outlet on your SS2 stao? I need to buy a 90 deg silicone bend but under on what size I need. Would probably be 2.5" yeah?

that would be 2.5 inches outlet with a 4inches inlet. Usually run a 2.5 inches 90 degrees long leg pipe to the factory cooler piping and a 4 inches metal induction pipe with pod.

Tested the atr28g2 on the 180sx today at wsid

Was very busy and only managed one decent run

On 20psi boost got 12.4 at 120mph shit 60ft 2.2 had abit if wheel spin on launch

Tried high boost 24psi but blew a cooler hose off and ruined the run also track temps were 30c in the middle of the day

Will be definately heading back in a few weeks on a Wednesday night when it's cooler and hopefully crack that Dam 11s

Still got 4-5psi in it so maybe 20kw and will let down the Tyres down more as I got et streets and was on 30psi try 25 or less psi

I've driven it hard since I got it tuned and just before I left I gave it a few test runs and cooler hose didn't blow off

But decided to come off at the runs spewing

The Tyres have made a huge difference to street Tyres

Takes off like a bullet no wheel spin on the street at all in any gear where as before you can't get traction till 3rd gear if your Aggresive

I've driven it hard since I got it tuned and just before I left I gave it a few test runs and cooler hose didn't blow off

But decided to come off at the runs spewing

The Tyres have made a huge difference to street Tyres

Takes off like a bullet no wheel spin on the street at all in any gear where as before you can't get traction till 3rd gear if your Aggresive

Sorry if I missed it but what tyres did you run? Good result with potential, bring on the 11s!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...