Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Super Drager said:

How tight of a fit is it? Doesn't foul on anything? 

It's a pretty tight fit but not impossible - Only thing it does foul on is the aircon drain pipe which I just chopped shorter. 
The only pain in the ass thing is the flange to manifold bolts are a bitch to get on and require some patience. 

  • 1 month later...

Some video footage from Last weeks Victoria Time attack at Philip Island GrandPix. 

ATR45SAT Turbocharger Powered Top Stage S14 SR20det (400rwkws @28psi, E85 fuel). Taking first in Modified class. Driven by John Richardson

 

  • Like 2

Posted in my own build thread, but relevant for this thread.

I got myself a Hypergear G3 high flow on a 21U turbo. I've had pretty good results, making 230rwkw @ 14psi on 98RON. This particular dyno graph shows boost dropping at the top end, this is because (due to my own request) Tao put on a 10psi OEM wastegate, and it just wasn't up to the task.

I've put on an aftermarket wastegate (pictured) and it now pulls 18psi happily all the way to redline.

I installed the turbo myself and it was very straightforward. Overall stoked with the results.

 

dyno.PNG

wastegate 1.PNG

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Just repaired a blown Borgwarner EFR with no exhaust wheel. Luckily the compressor wheel is undamaged. It has been fitted onto one of our ATR CBB cores with a custom grind turbine wheel to suit the original turbine housing profile. Looking to match original power figure before turbo failure, hopefully with a bit more torque through mid range.

orgcore.JPG

 

chra1.JPG

turbine.JPG

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted in my own build thread, but relevant for this thread.
I got myself a Hypergear G3 high flow on a 21U turbo. I've had pretty good results, making 230rwkw @ 14psi on 98RON. This particular dyno graph shows boost dropping at the top end, this is because (due to my own request) Tao put on a 10psi OEM wastegate, and it just wasn't up to the task.
I've put on an aftermarket wastegate (pictured) and it now pulls 18psi happily all the way to redline.
I installed the turbo myself and it was very straightforward. Overall stoked with the results.
 
dyno.thumb.PNG.9ba27bddec5b8d2d3cbac373685880c4.PNG
59870720d53b7_wastegate1.thumb.PNG.7c01332571db21538159e29105c149fe.PNG

Time for some e85 then
18 hours ago, hypergear said:

Just repaired a blown Borgwarner EFR with no exhaust wheel. Luckily the compressor wheel is undamaged. It has been fitted onto one of our ATR CBB cores with a custom grind turbine wheel to suit the original turbine housing profile. Looking to match original power figure before turbo failure, hopefully with a bit more torque through mid range

 

Post mortem review - what caused that failure?

 

First run with Brand new Ceramic ball bearing T4 print ATR44SS prototype hit the dyno this afternoon. Car made 406rwkws @ 22psi, Pump 98 fuel. full boost by 4000RPM. Stock 2JZGTE, sorry not an RB this time.

 

  • 3 months later...

Hello and greetings from Finland

I have had my skyline for 8 years now, and now its finally time to upgrade the turbo. I am looking for around 300rwkw with 98 fuel. With supporting mods of course. Since i have a limited budget i was thinkin of the ATR43G3SAT with thrust bearings. The price of that would be perfect, but i couldn`t find any dyno results or other info of that turbo with thrust bearings. I know that bb core is recomended with this, but i really like the price of the normal bearings and if it still would be good enough, it might be a choise. With bb core it seems to be really amazing. Or is there some other options i should consider? Maybe high flow or ss2? I am looking for the most cost effective way to get good end result.

 

 

For up to 300rwkws region a brand new ATR43G3SAT turbo is recommended.

ATR43G3SAT bush bearing, internally gated, P98 result based on a R33 Rb25det engine:

atr43g3power.jpg

atr43g3boost.jpg

 

  • Like 1

Thanks for the dyno graph. It looks pretty good in bush bearings too, but there sure is noticeable difference between ball bearings and bush bearings. About 70 Nm and 20 Kw in 3500 Rpm, if i looked correctly. I have couple of weeks time to think which one to get, before i get some money. I will go with teh ball bearings if i can afford them. If i can`t i will go with bush bearings. Either way i go, i think i will have a good turbo.

Back to back on the dyno measuring 4th gear paddle to the metal, there isn't that much of a visual differences to the curves. Take everyday road driving with partial throttle acceleration the differences are very noticeable. 

  • 2 weeks later...

There has been quite a number of updates applied in terms of wheels, housings and bearings in recent years so we will be starting another R34 GTT modification project, it will used in the development of our SS Ceramic ball bearing series turbochargers. 

lfront.JPG

Car is a 2000 model with 80,000KM on the clock, bought from an mature enthusiast whom spent quite few coins at it with:

 Split fire coil packs

700cc injectors (Bosch?) 

PFC ECU + Z32 AFM

3 inches Xfroce Varax exhaust 

Koyo radiator

High flowed OP6 turbo (appeared to be an old XTR model)

Walbro 255 fuel pump

NPC Heavy duty clutch

HKS return flow cooler kit.

cooler.jpg

Setup on the dyno for the first time, after few power pulls the turbo started to make some funny noises and we stopped it at 226rwkws at 11psi, Peeked 14psi at 4000RPM.

226rwkw.JPG

226rwkwboost.JPG  

Other issue worth mentioning is VCT. Using factory ECU/many aftermarket plugins, VCT solenoid produces a very distinctive "click" activation sound on throttle opening. PFC activates it in gear, so you should hear it clutched in 1st and a tap on the throttle. Mine is not clicking, later diagnostics have revealed signal output problems from the ECU. If VCT is not activated, there will be a lose in boost response by roughly 500RPM, and I found VCT problems frequently occurring with customers using old PFC plugins. 

vct.jpg

 I have re-high flowed the OP6 turbocharger using one of our ATR43SS2 ceramic ball bearing cores:

ss2front.jpg

ss2rear.jpg

  

Further dyno shown an improvement in response of 600RPM while a 27kws increase in power. 253rwkws @ 15psi

253rwkw.JPG

we had some boost taper issues on the dyno, and MAP comparison have once again shown a flow restriction caused by a return flow cooler. Boost pressure before cooler: 22psi, after: 15psi, pressure drop: 7PSI

253rwkwboost.JPG

 

The plan before my next dyno run is to trail PWR's vertical flow cooler as they do make one that bolt on to an R34 GTT and will be replacing the PFC with the latest Adaptronic Modular R34 plugin ECU.  

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...