Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, blah_blah said:

This is my return flow setup:

 

10929096_1009459115735114_79092875403676

 

In saying that i will be going to a custom piping setup in the next month. Just to make it cleaner less pipes and to fit a 4inch pod

Mmmm that looks awesome! Have you got any more pics?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, kingtube69 said:

Mmmm that looks awesome! Have you got any more pics?  

Only pics i got:

 

1939497_1009458549068504_274021022972297

 

10559751_1021991617815197_81149067125310

If anyone is interested i might sell my existing cooler pipe setup if i dont need it after my custom one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, blah_blah said:

If anyone is interested i might sell my existing cooler pipe setup if i dont need it after my custom one

My R32 has the same cooler kit, It was abnormally laggy, and I tried doing:

cooler.jpg

might be worth while give it a short and see if there is much differences in throttle response. Mine was huge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'd expect a huge difference in throttle response with no intercooler too!

So a water to air cooler, aka celica gt4 style which keeps the inlet tract super short might have some benefit for rb20 tragics? haha.

 

How is the research with the RB20 going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha the RB20det is probably the most troublesome, in past cases I just need to bolt up the bits, sort out the ecu and its good. But in this case I had to diagnose and fix heaps of worn OEM pieces that I didn't expect, plus mods fitted by previous owners didn't work as they seems. Still fixing and setting up test bed at current stage.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The return flow setup shown on top of the page,is the same setup

Vl turbos where running in the 90s and still some today.Core depending ..cant be to bad for flow as they run 9s on 30ish psi with autos and 3582s

Cant be to much pressure drop slowing them down..

Cheers

Darren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/01/2017 at 10:37 PM, V28VX37 said:

I've had this small issue recently with my ATR43-SS2 (2013) where I occasionally find a drop of oil underneath the front housing. I have checked the water and oil lines and they are all fine and tight. I've also been conscious to wipe the housing clean each time in an effort to pinpoint where it's coming from.

I took the photo below just then, you can see a bit of oil collecting at the edge of the housing and right under one of the housing bolts. It also looks a little wet right around the bolt so I'm wondering if that's the cause? I chucked a 13mm socket in there and tightened it a touch (it turned easy enough) but didn't want to overdo it as I don't know the torque specs.

@hypergear Tao have you seen these turbos spring a leak there before? What's the torque specs on the housing bolts? Cheers

32201403301_8f8ede1f1a_b.jpg

Bill and I were wracking our brains at Sandown about this and we reckon it's actually the oil feed line on the top of the core, leaking under the fitting that connects the braided line to the core. That sprays oil onto the rear of the front housing, which then drips down to the comp cover as above. The fitting under the oil line in the top left corner below:

28664626573_0ec72d6ac6_z.jpg 

Apparently there's a copper washer under that fitting and it's important that it's annealed before installation (?).

Tao, any pointers on where I could get a replacement fitting and copper washer for this turbo (ATR43SS2 late 2013)?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

Bill and I were wracking our brains at Sandown about this and we reckon it's actually the oil feed line on the top of the core, leaking under the fitting that connects the braided line to the core. That sprays oil onto the rear of the front housing, which then drips down to the comp cover as above. The fitting under the oil line in the top left corner below:

28664626573_0ec72d6ac6_z.jpg 

Apparently there's a copper washer under that fitting and it's important that it's annealed before installation (?).

Tao, any pointers on where I could get a replacement fitting and copper washer for this turbo (ATR43SS2 late 2013)?

Cheers

I don't think the fitting would require replacement, just the copper washer.  Autobarn should carry them, if not try a pirtek or similar. Annealing definitely helps as it allows the washer to be crushed nicely and provide a good seal imo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

Bill and I were wracking our brains at Sandown about this and we reckon it's actually the oil feed line on the top of the core, leaking under the fitting that connects the braided line to the core. That sprays oil onto the rear of the front housing, which then drips down to the comp cover as above. The fitting under the oil line in the top left corner below:

28664626573_0ec72d6ac6_z.jpg 

Apparently there's a copper washer under that fitting and it's important that it's annealed before installation (?).

Tao, any pointers on where I could get a replacement fitting and copper washer for this turbo (ATR43SS2 late 2013)?

Cheers

Yeah I have also noticed that every few events it would start leaking and the washer needs to be replaced, at first I had a alloy fitting and the fitting also needed to be replaced as it must of been deformed from the heat now using a steel fitting seems only the washers die.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just a 12mm copper washer you can get them form Auto spare shops normally hanging on a wall pack. the drain adaptor gasket is to suit OEM drain pipe, cheapest place to get that is Ebay or simply cut one out of gasket paper. No silicon glue on either of the fittings. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...