Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not suprised, being auto...my 4294 with a .91 T6 housing wasn't any laggier than a 3540 1.06 on a RB30 single cammer really with a auto

only a split second was a 3540 better and then the 3540 got fiercely trodden on...

Edited by jet_r31

agreed that drag+auto = a totally different ball game when it comes to response. its got very little in common with response on a street or circuit car.

have had a 3076 on an old school 4 pot feel as responsive as a T25 SR with the right cam and stall combo. easy to do, just useless around a bend.

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

Must be moving on from older technology that did it...

Eagerly waiting results as this was the same path I wanted to go down! :) Built motor? Is the 6262 Gunna be pushed hard mate?

yea fully built 25/30, will be pushed hard eventually ;). Just dummy fitted the hot side tonight.

dscn0577x.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Edited by SilverECR33

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Well after Jez's result on his standard 26, it'll be hard to go past the 6262. He made 402 at just over 20 -21 psi IIRC.

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

When I was comparing my 6466 to a 6262 a few weeks ago, the angle on the blades looked a little different but also the gap between the blades on the intake were signicantly more of the 6466. Both were CEA's

Hmm thats indicating its more than just a change in trim, the 64mm comp must have a way bigger exducer than the 62mm so its more or less an entirely difference turbo.

Like comparing a 3076 and 3082 I guess. Same stuff, different application entirely.

A link to a page with comparison to old tech 65mm wheel (I think the 62mm turbine is same tech) and compared to new 66 CEA turbine:

http://realstreetperformance.com/store/precision-billet-cea-6266-turbo-750hp-turbocharger-2709.html?zenid=59df912a5cff403c6491d3cf5176bc7c

FYI both 6262 and 6266 are rated as 700HP items. I'd be chasing that 66 CEA item, better tech is where its at.

Finally got the 5558 in today, can I use any 3" v-band flange off ebay (exhaust/dump side), and what oil line/fitting did you guys use - do I just go to Pirtek/Enzed or get an ebay jobbie - re: Kando lines fit? I am not sure if you just connect the oil line to part way in the existing line or get rid of existing and new one straight to block? thanks :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...