Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks mate!

Ron: the SR is good for about that 280-300kw mark. Its just about control factors. If on 98 a little ping will do a lot of pop at that level, but if tuned safely (like on E85) they are pretty OK.

For reference my 'built motor' is nothing but a refreshed stocker with forged pistons. Im reusing the crank and rods and aiming for a motor that will never see more than 350 even if I do go crazy in the long run. It will probably never see over 300 in reality.

Because the last tune was close to 430 RWKW. Different head and a few different mods I wanna see what these little things can do. They should crack 450 without too much trouble.

-5's aren't too bad, A Z32 at Unique Autosports just cracked 447rwkw on 21psi and pump fuel with them.

are you saying someone nearly cracked 600rwhp with -5's at 21psi ??

From what he's said he has 3" Intakes on the turbos but they are run of the mill -5's apart from that.

http://www.aus300zx....2&postcount=358

Edited by Super Drager

Thanks mate!

Ron: the SR is good for about that 280-300kw mark. Its just about control factors. If on 98 a little ping will do a lot of pop at that level, but if tuned safely (like on E85) they are pretty OK.

For reference my 'built motor' is nothing but a refreshed stocker with forged pistons. Im reusing the crank and rods and aiming for a motor that will never see more than 350 even if I do go crazy in the long run. It will probably never see over 300 in reality.

Should go a td06sl2 20g 8 cm but with billet compressor wheels

Transistient boost response will be better and get maybe 10kw more up top

Hypergear can get them or gtpumps or you can get kando to make one as kamak is making billet compressor wheels now and kando get there turbos from them

From what he's said he has 3" Intakes on the turbos but they are run of the mill -5's apart from that.

http://www.aus300zx....2&postcount=358

I think you'll find they're 2871R's or -10's from my conversations with John from Uas who is building on it.

Could have misunderstood though.

I think you'll find they're 2871R's or -10's from my conversations with John from Uas who is building on it.

Could have misunderstood though.

Nope, take a look at the thread i posted. GT2860-5's. There is a Z32 that was built with GT2871R's though, he put down 467rwkw.

Should go a td06sl2 20g 8 cm but with billet compressor wheels

Transistient boost response will be better and get maybe 10kw more up top

Hypergear can get them or gtpumps or you can get kando to make one as kamak is making billet compressor wheels now and kando get there turbos from them

Have you seen any results of any of the above turbos vs billet wheeled versions?

my PT6262 .84 TS will be arriving this week hopefully, should in interesting. I havnt seen anyones results on this forum using one with this setup (25/30 with vct).. should be neck breakingly responsive ;), and if it taps out too early, well.. only $285 for the 1.0 housing to be sent to replace the 84 and try again.

my PT6262 .84 TS will be arriving this week hopefully, should in interesting. I havnt seen anyones results on this forum using one with this setup (25/30 with vct).. should be neck breakingly responsive ;), and if it taps out too early, well.. only $285 for the 1.0 housing to be sent to replace the 84 and try again.

Eagerly waiting results as this was the same path I wanted to go down! :) Built motor? Is the 6262 Gunna be pushed hard mate?

Have you seen any results of any of the above turbos vs billet wheeled versions?

Just had a result sent in from a SR20det customer made 282rwkws. That is our billet version, don't want to hijack the thread, check out dyno readings on my thread.

I have a billet 7175 (.94 single entry) on a single cam rb30. With a powerglide.

It's as responsive if not slightly better than a 35r (1.0x). Makes 549hp@28psi on e85. Trapped 138mph. Keen to feed it proper boost soon and see how it goes :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...