Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not suprised, being auto...my 4294 with a .91 T6 housing wasn't any laggier than a 3540 1.06 on a RB30 single cammer really with a auto

only a split second was a 3540 better and then the 3540 got fiercely trodden on...

Edited by jet_r31

agreed that drag+auto = a totally different ball game when it comes to response. its got very little in common with response on a street or circuit car.

have had a 3076 on an old school 4 pot feel as responsive as a T25 SR with the right cam and stall combo. easy to do, just useless around a bend.

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

Must be moving on from older technology that did it...

Eagerly waiting results as this was the same path I wanted to go down! :) Built motor? Is the 6262 Gunna be pushed hard mate?

yea fully built 25/30, will be pushed hard eventually ;). Just dummy fitted the hot side tonight.

dscn0577x.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Edited by SilverECR33

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Well after Jez's result on his standard 26, it'll be hard to go past the 6262. He made 402 at just over 20 -21 psi IIRC.

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

When I was comparing my 6466 to a 6262 a few weeks ago, the angle on the blades looked a little different but also the gap between the blades on the intake were signicantly more of the 6466. Both were CEA's

Hmm thats indicating its more than just a change in trim, the 64mm comp must have a way bigger exducer than the 62mm so its more or less an entirely difference turbo.

Like comparing a 3076 and 3082 I guess. Same stuff, different application entirely.

A link to a page with comparison to old tech 65mm wheel (I think the 62mm turbine is same tech) and compared to new 66 CEA turbine:

http://realstreetperformance.com/store/precision-billet-cea-6266-turbo-750hp-turbocharger-2709.html?zenid=59df912a5cff403c6491d3cf5176bc7c

FYI both 6262 and 6266 are rated as 700HP items. I'd be chasing that 66 CEA item, better tech is where its at.

Finally got the 5558 in today, can I use any 3" v-band flange off ebay (exhaust/dump side), and what oil line/fitting did you guys use - do I just go to Pirtek/Enzed or get an ebay jobbie - re: Kando lines fit? I am not sure if you just connect the oil line to part way in the existing line or get rid of existing and new one straight to block? thanks :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...