Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So thats a 0.82 on a 2L Evo? Thanks for posting.

I am simply going on the single example I have seen in person and then reading various sites, and as per that link i posted some pretty detailed testing vs the 3076. I am asking questions here more than making statements.

And yes transient response is ace...but I am a poor bastard and whilst I would love to have all the power and response in the world...my budget means I need to compromise somwhere...to invest what is about 4.5k in a 7670 installed on my car....well I need to really warm to the idea if it going to make the same power as what just came off

Yes thats on a 2L emo mate. The thing with these EFR's is (yes im repeating myself) but the dynosheet really does these things NO JUSTICE whatsoever! I guarantee if you threw an EFR on your car and drove it before you looked at the dynosheet you wouldn't care what was on that sheet cos you'd already won! 

These things literally respond to throttle input like an N/A its honestly the only way i can describe it. 

  • Like 1
49 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Yes thats on a 2L emo mate. The thing with these EFR's is (yes im repeating myself) but the dynosheet really does these things NO JUSTICE whatsoever! I guarantee if you threw an EFR on your car and drove it before you looked at the dynosheet you wouldn't care what was on that sheet cos you'd already won! 

These things literally respond to throttle input like an N/A its honestly the only way i can describe it. 

Agreed.

You can't go past a 7670 for your Sr20, however, make sure you go twin scroll, and use small cams (256 or 260 max).

If you want to keep cost down, go the twin scroll internal gate version.

The only other thing is to factor in turbo shaft speed sensor (and ecu that can read it). EFRs are very sensitive to overspinning and will suffer catastrophic failure operating outside recommended max range. For example, max recommended for 7670 is 140,000rpm. This equates to around 30psi on my car. Might be slightly more on a 2L.

 

Think its 127K Joey??  But no idea on psi lol. Wait n see next week on Nicks car when results are in ?

Then get ya ass over to my place for a piss up in a few weeks! ?

Edited by Mick_o
2 hours ago, Mick_o said:

Think its 127K Joey??  But no idea on psi lol. Wait n see next week on Nicks car when results are in ?

Then get ya ass over to my place for a piss up in a few weeks! ?

I agree with everything in the above ?

Psi would depend on how well you engine breathes, would it not? 127,000 rpm is max for the 8374. Might be an idea to drop a speed sensor in it depending on how hard you wanna push it.

3 minutes ago, GTR_JOEY said:

Lol! Buying more houses, which is what you should be doing.

 

yours won't be ready for ages, I know what your like ?

 

 

 

 

Not really. Exhaust has started. I had to wait for Dennis to finish up a few things and get some cars out. Everything is up there, just a matter of welding it together. Then tow to Insight for ECU wire in. It won't be long. :).

On 30/07/2016 at 8:31 PM, GTR_JOEY said:

 

Anyone know what the max RPM for the 83/74 1.05 and what's does that equate to in PSI approximately 

For the record, compressor RPM and pressure are not related... at all. 

  • Like 1
On 26/07/2016 at 3:58 PM, Mick_o said:

Honestly a GTX isnt even remotely similar to an EFR. They are next level shit! Ive Driven Petes 6266 and an 8374 and throttle response and transient response arent even comparable man it is THAT much better! I thought my GTX was good & while it was i then moved onto a HTA and that was alot better than the GTX i think the precision was very much the same as the HTA but EFR chews them all up and spits them out! As Johnny said a normal shift feels like a sequential box it really hits that hard again when you swap cogs. ?

Micko, you know I had a hiccup with the Vcam ECU setup and it was sorted last Thursday, the car is much different down low and gets going nicely, totally different to when you drove it at the BBQ :)

I was very impressed with Bretts response with the 8374 on his 26 and was wondering how the 8374 would be on a 3.2.

I believe the 8374 turbine wheel is much lighter than my 6266 Gen2 wheel, so it will spin earlier, I wonder if anyone has a back to back between the 2 turbos. They are both rated at 800ph , so i guess the light weight turbine wheel is the major difference ?

We spoke about my motor needs to breathe better, I left everything as it was on the car before the initial 3.2 build, including the .84 rear housing.

Would a 1.00 or bigger rear housing help on my 3.2 , keeping in mind I do not want to loose any bottom end.

The exhaust is 3.5" from dump to tail, not eager to change it as it seems to work well and not too noisy , but would a 4" dump make any difference ?

14 hours ago, Piggaz said:

How long, Pete?

Whats on the list to do?

trying to low mount it?

Few months.

Aim is to get the manifold done while I'm out at site for the 3 weeks now, then need to sort all the wiring, fuel system, oil lines etc, just he minor finishing which will take a little bit of time, but I'll have a week off to try bust that out After that just need to sort out a tuna and book it in for first startup and run in !

Low mount is the aim. Not going to be easy but not going to be easy to do a top mount either. Using 1 5/8 inch tube as well which doesn't help

 

I'm not sure it would clear 32 aircon as the unit is longer and the line for it heads straight back. Additionally this is pretty cost competitive and either way know it's a perfect fit.

 

Good point on the clearance, anyone for a clue on a good amount to leave?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
    • Dang, those BBS are so nice! 
×
×
  • Create New...