Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well the internal gate 20g sucked balls last night. Well it did perform well except it was running 21psi minimum. This on 98 octane, We got it up to around 280kw.

We tried everything to back the boost down, even had the wastegate flap off and was lazy onto boost but then ran 21psi after 5000.

Ill post sheet up later

Its not blakes old turbo.

Roy at 4750 there is a missfire, i have fitted splitfires which sorted the constant miss, and a few other things but there is a miss at 4750 everytime.

The dyno rpm scale isnt perfect guys. Working off roller speed

I had barely any preload on my last td05h18g and I got full boost 19psi by 4200rpm on a sr but now got another one on the same engine but preloaded it about 3mm 3 complete turns in and now it makes 20psi by 4000rpm

Only difference now is its running eflex e85 where as it was running bp98 before

So not sure if preloading the wastegate tighter made the 200rpm boost response better or the fuel

Its not blakes old turbo.

Roy at 4750 there is a missfire, i have fitted splitfires which sorted the constant miss, and a few other things but there is a miss at 4750 everytime.

The dyno rpm scale isnt perfect guys. Working off roller speed

Ah, k.

Did you try increase the spark dwell?

No i didnt. Car will be back monday night. Worked on ur car, ill try it on the rb25 tomorrow. Only 1 trouble area at 5000.

He is going to weld a new dump to the turbo, the stock setup even with the die grinded outlet sucks balls.

ah me clutch fail!

Did you get a graph anyway?

On the news on poncams for my car, someone has a spare set lying around who I'm going to do some deals with so will have new results soonish :whistling:

Hey Simon how does your old T04Z GTR compare with ur current T67 GTst in terms of rolling runs on the street, take -off and seat of the pants whack?? Much in it?

yeah it should get close, was told it had a new clutch..big words like heavy duty and ceramic were used...

looks like they were just that... words :/

I hate the screamer already, when it first cracked I thought WTF!!!...some more work for you Scotty..lol

Thin red line is my old turbo, I have lost a little down low but it doesnt really feel any slower ..power ramps up so much nicer..

DSC04047.jpg

It Did hit 276kw at one point, holds boost nice too

DSC04048.jpg

Im just happy I can drive it again and as long as I dont mash the pedal too hard the clutch holds up ok :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
×
×
  • Create New...