Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

inb4 Chinese own every inner property in Australia

One of the higher ups at work sold his house for around 2 mil...the girl doing the negotiations was 18 years old. Parents bought the place for her (well obviously). There are more wealthy Chinese in China than there are average income Australians and for as long as the wealthy Chinese are allowed to buy their way into permanent residency with a zero turnover business and a few million in assets, these sorts of property purchases will continue, forcing everyone else to the fringe. Sadly only have the sellers to blame who are of course going to take the highest me offer, but selling out the property market to overseas in the process.

Have been saying this will happen for 8 years and now it's topic of the lunchroom at work everytime I'm in there :/

Wonder how bad that will get before anything actually gets done about it, if at all? This is exactly what happened to Singapore...

  • Like 1

It's f**ked. You should have to show a profit to get residency based on business. The amount of shitty cafés' that lose money hand over for for years that are owned by Chinese is ridiculous

there was the old trendy suburbs cafe business model...

1) start up trendy, no-frills cafe that makes good coffee and small breakfast menu.

2) establish reputation and regular customers, employ good staff etc.

3) sell to chinese

4) chinese use lackluster staff, shit coffee etc.

5) business slumps

6) buy back off chinese for fraction of price sold to them earlier.

there was the old trendy suburbs cafe business model...

1) start up trendy, no-frills cafe that makes good coffee and small breakfast menu.

2) establish reputation and regular customers, employ good staff etc.

3) sell to chinese

4) chinese use lackluster staff, shit coffee etc.

5) business slumps

6) buy back off chinese for fraction of price sold to them earlier.

Salvatore Malatesta's (st ali) M.O.

He had done this sooooo many times

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...