Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, with minimal tools, is there a way to thread the Haltech IAT sensor at the OEM location or somewhere else easy ?

I bought this sensor and going for a tune with the Haltech ecu this week-end. However, I still havent figured if I will be able to use my Haltech sensor or not.

thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442832-haltech-iat-vs-oem-iat-rb26/
Share on other sites

Might be off topic, but what's wrong with the stock IAT? it already is connected on the harness and goes to the ECU, I'm sure the Haltech reads it.. unless you're not running a Plug In one.

Might be off topic, but what's wrong with the stock IAT? it already is connected on the harness and goes to the ECU, I'm sure the Haltech reads it.. unless you're not running a Plug In one.

There's plenty wrong with it. It is a big heavy lump - essentially the same as the coolant sensor. It is seriously affected by the temperature of the plenum itself (rather than the air flowing through it). The Nissan ECU doesn't really use it for the same reasons that other ECUs use IAT sensors. If you're MAP sensing then you have to measure IAT in order to get the density calculation right. But the Nissan ECU was using a MAF, so it had no need to measure IAT. The general concensus is that the Nissan ECU only uses the air temp for taking action in case of severe high temperature.

There's plenty wrong with it. It is a big heavy lump - essentially the same as the coolant sensor. It is seriously affected by the temperature of the plenum itself (rather than the air flowing through it). The Nissan ECU doesn't really use it for the same reasons that other ECUs use IAT sensors. If you're MAP sensing then you have to measure IAT in order to get the density calculation right. But the Nissan ECU was using a MAF, so it had no need to measure IAT. The general concensus is that the Nissan ECU only uses the air temp for taking action in case of severe high temperature.

Correct, it's junk... I use mine but I really should get off my ass and install a adequate high speed air temp sensor

There's plenty wrong with it. It is a big heavy lump - essentially the same as the coolant sensor. It is seriously affected by the temperature of the plenum itself (rather than the air flowing through it). The Nissan ECU doesn't really use it for the same reasons that other ECUs use IAT sensors. If you're MAP sensing then you have to measure IAT in order to get the density calculation right. But the Nissan ECU was using a MAF, so it had no need to measure IAT. The general concensus is that the Nissan ECU only uses the air temp for taking action in case of severe high temperature.

makes sense, I never thought of it that way :)

I've got mine welded to my cross over Plazmaman pipe before the TB (I deleted the the fugly stock RB25DET cross over pipe)

  • 6 years later...

Question. 

Would you need to have the car retuned if using a plug n play fast air temp sensor? 

Like the below?

https://www.dahtoneracing.com/online-store/Dahtone-Racing-RB26-plug-and-play-fast-response-IAT-sensor-p200603263

Having a Haltech CAN gauge vs MFD intercooler sensors on the 34R, i notice an approx 25-30 degree difference between the IAT sensor vs Intercooler sensor (Intercooler reads 30 odd degrees vs 50-60Deg on the IAT)

Since the Haltech has been tuned to drop timing etc on air temp, i'm certainly feeling a drop in power due to heat soak of the IAT. 

 

Edited by djvoodoo
On 28/12/2020 at 8:13 AM, djvoodoo said:

Would you need to have the car retuned if using a plug n play fast air temp sensor? 

Not at all, just get a GM or Haltech sensor. Go into your ECU, hit F4 then select the IAT sensor, select the correct scaling (haltech has a bunch of calibration files ready to go), save, and done!

 

(also, I would just cut the plug and re-terminate instead of using an adaptor which over time may corrode, snap, etc. and increase resistance over time)

  • 3 years later...
48 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Well, you'd have to. The non-26 RBs do not have IAT sensors anywhere else that you could replace if you wanted to.

Do you have to, though? That sounds quite messy to me. Surely it would be easier to place it a bit further down. And drill into easily replaced piping instead. See the old replies above as well.

FWIW the Blitz intercooler kit on my RB25 has a nipple on the elbow of the pipe going into the plenum. No need for drilling. Looks vaguely like this:

icse_kit.thumb.jpg.8b812b1f0af04400a6217b480d96ede2.jpg

Well, it is trivial to drill a hole and tap a thread into the thick cast alloy of the cross pipe. It is not possible to drill and tap/screw a fitting into thinwall steel or alloy pipe. You need to weld something on. So, yeah, if I was doing it, I would throw it in that pipe somewhere.

As to that Blitz kit's already welded in fitting....well, that's what it's there for, and that's essentially the same place, give or take.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...