Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Sau.

I am fully aware that different dyno's = different power output, and generally you will not get the same result twice, even on the same dyno and same conditions.

My question is this.

I had my 34R tuned (power FC, front pipe/metal cat/3.5 inch exhaust and boost restrictor removed)

On this dyno, it netted me 263 atw on a 4 wheel dyno

I am now getting Garret - 7 turbos, hks evc 5 and a retune at a different workshop.

They have put the car on the dyno for the "Before tune" run, and this came up with only 213awkw on a 4 wheel dyno.

I was expecting a variance of about 10-15kw give or take, but 50kw seems to be huge.

Reading the RB26 dyno thread, the 263awkw power range for my mods seem to be in line with the average 34R owner.

Is it more likely that the new workshop the car is at is a very low reading dyno?

I guess I'll find out once i get the car back :-)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/
Share on other sites

Thread should get good so I'm in!

The track doesn't lie.

Care to elaborate. Good in what way mate...

As i said in my original post, I am aware of dyno variances, and that dyno operators can change load etc to make a "happy" dyno. That said, as per RB26 dyno thread, with my mods, the majority of GTR owners achieve between 240-260 atw.

For a dyno to throw 213kw is very low.

I guess you're right. Track will separate the men from the boys ey.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343101
Share on other sites

I meant good sarcastically.

Missed the smiley ;)

Remember that it's not just inflated high figures, a low initial run is also beneficial for the shop for impressive printouts.

Of course there could have been a reason for your car putting out lower power. Boost leak etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343119
Share on other sites

^ dyno wars lol.. that's what he meant

Maybe the previous operator ran it in 4th and maybe this one ran it in 5th (being a R34 GT-R, 5th gear is 1:1 as it's a 6 speed).

Mine didn't change power much between different gears, only the torque went through the roof.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343126
Share on other sites

I concur with the strapping & wheelspin point.

Face it......losses in the drivetrain are not as large as the difference between flywheel power and wheel power would have you believe. If they were, then the oil would boil in gearboxes and diffs in a single dyno pull (just based on the massive number of kW of energy dumped into those oils). Therefore, the power must be going somewhere. And the tyre/roller interface is the single best candidate. Face it - those things are spinning around really fast, so they are well cooled. They definitely have slip at the interface, and we all can see that the harder you strap the car down the more power it makes, so therefore power is definitely being lost in slip.

And that's before you get to the paranoid android stuff involving workshops doing low reading initial runs to make any mods they do look better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343172
Share on other sites

It's a tad frustrating that there seems to be a culture of automatically assuming that a workshop/dyno/tuner who produces dyno results which read a bit higher than what you are used to the results/tuner are potentially misleading or dishonest and sometimes the info is taken less seriously.

50kw sounds like a LOT to lose, dyno variance or otherwise - you'll certainly be able to tell if the car is as much quicker after the retune as the numbers would indicate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343179
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343233
Share on other sites

Power delivery. What you lost in peak power you may have gained everywhere else

So you think he lost 70rwkw and gained what in the midrange? Makes no sense. Yes power delivery and area under the curve are what counts but come on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343296
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Feels faster or is faster?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343314
Share on other sites

The term of 1HP, is defined by people and more specifically to the people whom builds dyno meters.

There are no obvious concepts proves one's terminology is at mistake, so there will not be an matching dyno reading between two branded dyno meters.

On top of it, there are configurations determined by operator that could alter an precise output, as well as the extend of vehicle setup on particular dyno meters.

Seeking psychological balance as well as for the sake of promoting successful businesses. Owners whom bought a lower reading dyno will likely to argue that their reading stand for the absolute accuracy while others are inflated, While operator with an higher reading dyno might argue the lower reading dynos are poorly calibrated, On the end every one is there to defend for their own investment, While the true focus of a car can only produce so much "HP" with given fuel and given supporting mods at optimum calibration is lost.

Dyno is just a tool. so the quotation of what a specific setup is capable of doing is more accurately served based on past experiences of an likely setup. As I quote the capacity of my turbochargers to relatively common turbochargers which past collection of data is plentiful. Alternatively quote based on a percentage gain based on factory output. That way it is more meaningful then just a number.

Besides, for people whom value the safety of their own and others on road, the maximum potential of a engine is rarely used. It might be worth while for some tuners advertising drive ability and fuel consumption rather then just peek power. Which I prefer if tuners might be able to put some explanations into their work and spend some time educate people how a car should be tuned based on Torque, AFR, Timing, and Fuel maps. That way not only ensures the vehicle is tuned to their maximum potential, and most importantly let customers understand what their maximum potential is, in reference to supporting mods installed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343349
Share on other sites

long story short, dyno a tuning tool to safely determine max torque and load up the motor without snapping out sideways and getting pulled over by cops.

Want to test power? go do a quarter mile.. that never lies (technical constraints apply, such as: tyres, weather, surface temperature, driver ability, not getting kicked off the track because you ran a 10, etc.)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343384
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
    • Thanks for the quick reply. To be clear, when you say turbo shuffle do you mean turbo flutter "stustustu" or referring to something else? I had thought they were the same thing. When I wrote the post my intention was to say it wasn't a flutter/compression surge sound. My understanding was that a flutter sound would be occurring when throttle is released, whereas I can keep the throttle in the same position for this noise
    • Hi everyone, I've been wrestling with this for a while now and have been trying to find out the cause. For context, the turbos used are Garrett 2860 -5s, the BOV is a BNR32 HKS SSQV IV kit, the car is currently tuned to ~470 whp on 17.5 psi. The car drives normally, pulls well when it doesn't happen, and I can replicate it fairly easily. It does not sound like turbo shuffle or flutter. The engine has only a thousand or so miles and has had this behavior since it was completed. After my engine was built for my R32 GTR, I noticed that the car now sometimes makes an air discharge sound on what appears to be positive boost pressure that sounds really similar to a BOV. I had thought that it was a BOV issue but even when replacing it with a brand new unit, the sound persisted. It seems like it's coming from the passenger side but I may be mistaken. The closest scenario I could find was this post here https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/ started by @yakshii and it sounds very similar. As in, at partial throttle once I reach positive boost I begin to hear the same psh psh psh psh psh sound like air is leaking somewhere when I keep the throttle in the same position. It most commonly happens in 4th gear at around 3-3.5k RPM and 5th gear around 2.5-3k RPM, which seems to coincide with normal positive boost thresholds. It might be similar to what @Austrian GTR mentioned about his own HKS SSQV. Notable difference would be that when he applies more throttle when it happens, it stops. In my scenario if I apply more throttle during this repeated psh psh psh sound, the cadence of the sound gets faster and louder rather than stopping. If I lift off slightly and apply throttle again, it will normally stop and pull without issue. I've checked all rubber couplers to ensure that they are tight, but have not gotten the opportunity to properly do a pressurized boost leak test. If anyone has had similar experiences or thoughts on what might be the cause, I'd be very keen to hear them. I also have a video of it happening from inside the cabin, if that would make it easier to understand: https://youtu.be/2zqZXcx8jbA
×
×
  • Create New...