Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Get in the Tiida and just rock up.

Take the keys off Jimbo and rip a launch up the street.

Wish it was that easy, after I get the OK I have to get the girls looked after and book a flight to Sydney

You are one sick puppy Paul :spank: nice butt :3some:

I don't think so, said it was the first run ??

It is just about impossible to speak to anyone that knows what is going on and only get info second hand ?

Sure will be glad when it is over :)

I am sure they feel the same way :)

I am not the best at reading graphs but next week I will know how it feels when I have my fat arse on the seat and a 350 Klm drive home, going to use the old Highway to give it some work away from the Freeway :)

I hope there is a heap better graph once the final tune is done :/

Hi Mick-o , I asked that question before and I think they said they cannot do it with their Dyno program, I would think you could make the program do what you want it to ??

Needs more boost!!

Good to see it going ( I too cannot understand why some people show mph instead of rpm).

My guess is the final figure will be between 400 and 500 awkw - anywhere in that range should do!

  • Like 1

Needs more boost!!

Good to see it going ( I too cannot understand why some people show mph instead of rpm).

My guess is the final figure will be between 400 and 500 awkw - anywhere in that range should do!

Hi Bob, just want it finished and hopefully give me the responsive results I have worked to get, well paid to get :)

Looking at 400awkw ish on 98 pump. maybe 450 with E85.

Does not matter at this stage, I just want my car back :)

I'd say 5 months is probably ahead of time on a build like this by a professional workshop....

There will be a month or more of a bit of back and forth once delivered to sort any small issues, run in and re-tune etc.

... it's better not to hope for a number on a page, regardless of what the car makes on that dyno on that day on that fuel your allways just a little dissaponted.

... these days I just rock up and go 'it make what it makes'

Cheers

J.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...