Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Welp, too late already committed to the cam cover breathers to be welded on.

I did think about adding a catch can in line with the drivers side sump breather as a phase 2 along with a drain to the sump on the original catch can but with an inline ball valve so I can have it closed if needed. 
 

Likely a single breather would have been enough but I think I’m overcompensating to hopefully not have to empty my catch can and clean up oil over flow every session. 
 

out of curiosity has anyone actually measured crank case pressure before and after various mods? I’m considering adding a sensor for science 

I just used a can that's easy to empty after every session and pour it back into the fill hole. Takes about 40 seconds when you have 40 minutes between runs :p

I don't see how changing any catch can stuff will reduce pressure if the system is sealed. And if it's vented - Does it matter where it's vented with regards to overall pressure?

1 minute ago, Kinkstaah said:

I don't see how changing any catch can stuff will reduce pressure if the system is sealed. And if it's vented - Does it matter where it's vented with regards to overall pressure?

Yeah - the secret learned a long time ago is that the RB likes to belch oil out the covers, and/or starve the pump because it drowns the head in oil, because the upflow of crankcase gases from piston blowby comes up through the oil drain holes in the block and prevents the oil from flowing back down.

The external vents from sump are about creating an alternative path/much more XS area for gas flow to decrease the gas velocity up through the oil drains and allow the oil to get back down.

So, it's not about pressure at all. It is about flows - gas up and oil down - or when it's not working, gas up and oil not going where it is supposed to after it arrives at the top, except out through the cam cover vents. And regardless of whether the catch can is vented to air or vented to the turbo inlet, it must still be vented because a sealed system would blow out the crank seals, or something equally bad.

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

I just used a can that's easy to empty after every session and pour it back into the fill hole. Takes about 40 seconds when you have 40 minutes between runs 😛
 

my catch can is pretty easy to empty but it overflows due to the blowby/crank case pressure etc.
max I have drained is ~600ml even with a ~2.3L capacity. So it is not just about having to drain it out its the mess it makes down the firewall and under the car and rear passenger tyre from the overflow oil being blasted by screamer + air in general.

Ending up on the ground cleaning the oil up and having oil on your arms when everyone else can chill and watch the other sessions gets old fast :rolleyes:

  • Sad 1
2 hours ago, CRSKmD said:

my catch can is pretty easy to empty but it overflows due to the blowby/crank case pressure etc.
max I have drained is ~600ml even with a ~2.3L capacity. So it is not just about having to drain it out its the mess it makes down the firewall and under the car and rear passenger tyre from the overflow oil being blasted by screamer + air in general.

Ending up on the ground cleaning the oil up and having oil on your arms when everyone else can chill and watch the other sessions gets old fast :rolleyes:

Seeing just how complicated you're making this is kind of terrifying to me. I would not want this level of hoses running all around the engine. I also am a fan of draining back to sump by default.

3 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Seeing just how complicated you're making this is kind of terrifying to me. I would not want this level of hoses running all around the engine. I also am a fan of draining back to sump by default.

not something I originally wanted to do. My plan was to just add the cam splash shields. This is the result of speaking with a few people in both time attack and drifting that have RB's making the same or more power than mine with the same issues. Using their experience and advice for what has actually worked in a similar application (sustained high RPM, long sweeping corners).

They all have had at least an additional head sump drain breathers on top of the rear of head welsh plug drain/breather.

I wouldn't do this for a car that's only street driven even my current setup has been sufficient for street duties.

  • Like 2

One of the big things people mess up to, is the location of the ports on the sump.

Add them in one spot, and the movement of everything in the crankcase makes it hard for oil to drain down there. Place it in another area, and it aids it.

Same sort of issue with the cam covers. One side of drain holes is copping it hard from air movement pushing up.

 

Also, if your catch can has a 2.3L capacity, and you've only ever drained 600ml of oil out of the catchcan, yet the catch cans breather has puked oil everywhere, fact of the matter is, your catch can is doing a shit job of oil/air separation, and a massive improvement alone would just be in a better catchcan design.

25 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

fact of the matter is, your catch can is doing a shit job of oil/air separation, and a massive improvement alone would just be in a better catchcan design.

That too, but I think this is why she's put the work into the cam cover baffles. I mean, a catch can should only need to be a catch can, not an oil air separator also. Not to say that putting the effort into having it do a better job of oil-air sep is a waste of time, but doing the sep earlier is always going to make life better. And that should happen now anyway.

  • Like 1

I think the catch can design is pretty flawed. Evident in the fact that the V2 one moved to a larger top mounted filter which alone would have helped with overflow and reduce restrictions compared with the side filter. I also imagine there was a major improvement to the baffling design.

It is worth mentioning that this catch can with the RB20 was never as much of an issue and the high kms RB25 is likely a part of the problem.

I have gotten quotes for both a new "Vibrant Gen 3" catch can and to modify this existing ones but that may have to wait until after the track day. I hope the sump/head breathers/drains and cam splash plates will be enough

1 hour ago, CRSKmD said:

I think the catch can design is pretty flawed. Evident in the fact that the V2 one moved to a larger top mounted filter which alone would have helped with overflow and reduce restrictions compared with the side filter. I also imagine there was a major improvement to the baffling design.

It is worth mentioning that this catch can with the RB20 was never as much of an issue and the high kms RB25 is likely a part of the problem.

I have gotten quotes for both a new "Vibrant Gen 3" catch can and to modify this existing ones but that may have to wait until after the track day. I hope the sump/head breathers/drains and cam splash plates will be enough

Shove more foam in it as a minimum if you possibly can. Or steel wool (not the stuff with soap on it!)

Baffles / getting the oil out of the air is huge, and should be done at both the cam cover, and the catch can.

 

I'm about to do a power steering reservoir, and even that needs some thought to make sure air is separated from the oil, to stop evil Cavitation. :)

I'll probably look at doing my own catchcan later on too.

1 hour ago, MBS206 said:

Shove more foam in it as a minimum if you possibly can. Or steel wool (not the stuff with soap on it!)

Unfortunately there is no way to properly access the baffles. It’s a welded unit and the inlets and drain are too small to jam anything down realistically. Same with the breather I took off the cover and foam and it’s basically a wall

  • Sad 1

I got the four AN10 fitting welded up to the cam covers and started up making the head to sump breather/drain lines.

The front passenger side cover I used a 45 up top and a 90 at the bottom into the stock VCT head drain spot (3/4" BPST to AN10 adapter) thats unused on the RB25DET NEO with some speedflow flame shield to protect it from the manifolds heat.

lVyWNkc.jpeg

3qVuebk.jpeg

H6AAFEH.jpeg

 

back passenger side was a 90 up top with some flame shield and 45 at the sump end.

r4ZFLt7.jpeg

The rear drivers is 45 at both ends

hfQpTek.jpeg

cliv6us.jpeg

DHVEl77.jpeg

 

the front drivers fitting is capped off for now but ready to go if i want to try moving the breathers around.

qfabd0l.jpeg

I was told by the fabricator to leave all the welds raw for now to make sure there are no pin hole leaks.

A lot of cleaning up, re bundling looms and degreasing to go as well as final assembly on the cam cover baffles.

The first real test will be 28th March at a Circuit event.

added complexity and more spots for leaks but overall looks relatively neat imo

u0H0ELD.jpeg

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Good work. I will say, this line circled however, will potentially pool with oil, as it's going from high, to low, to high, before heading downwards.

Screenshot_20250321-162103.thumb.png.37866b63c9de62d2b5b66b6a9c405f5c.png

Yeah good call, I will endeavour to tuck that down when I rewrap the looms it’s pushed up by

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Got just the wing painted and fitted up to the existing boot. Big visual change and about time after having a GTR wing sitting in the shed since 2018

FYiWBqZ.jpeg

pkkaQ1G.jpeg

Headed up to Mallala with a quick obligatory stop in at Boliver OTR

b2s0RR7.jpeg

Oil control mods seems to have worked. I checked the catch can after session 1 and there was a dribble of water/e85 with barely any oil in it. After session 2 and 3 there was almost nothing and I stopped checking after that. so either great success or catastrophic failure/block of the external breather

The GTR wing made a noticeable difference in the 160-185km/h sweepers.

It was a very hot day for the cars at over 33C but the previously done cooling upgrade/ducting/water sprayers meant I never saw over 60C intake, 105C water and 100C oil and temps would drop back down very quickly once I shut it down.

AD09's are a decent tyre but certainly and expectedly a step down when compared the the CR-S/AR-1 I have had on the car for years of track days. The handling characteristics of my car which I often describe using the Tony Hawks Pro Skater balance mechanic where either side of the center is understeer/oversteer was much more pronounced with no "green/safe" zone in the middle. However, imo it steers well/easily during oversteer largely thanks to the custom ACOSTAL front end.

wFlPWdq.jpeg

Enjoy a loose lap POV with my mate giggling away as a passenger.

 

12RHG8R.png?1

H40j5WN.jpeg

Group photo for Peer Pressure Racing

7g5jxGW.jpeg

made it back home and gave it a wash

gYH9mTR.jpeg

Overall a great success compared to my previous two track days where i cooked the Starlets motor and blew up the new diff in the R32

 

Edited by CRSKmD
  • Like 6
  • 2 months later...

First time trying out a regularity format at the Peter Hall Memorial 6hr. It was an interesting experience with everyone on our team being brand new to the format. Safe to say reading and understanding the rules and scoring system would have really helped our team. We finished firmly last thanks to the majority of all laps across the team being penalties.

In the words of my teammate Matt “Turns out we are both too quick and illiterate.”

Another car had entered before us and already secured number 12 so i needed to clearly cross them out to avoid confusion for any other blue calsonic livery'd r32s at the event.

fyFQtz6.jpeg

The team consisted of an R32, an AE86, a supercharged V35, and a Kia CEED GT bought at salvage. I ensured we all had matching "Peer Pressure Racing" banners and overalls.

xJSNC4v.jpeg


This is the longest session of back to back hot laps the car has ever done (20mins no cool downs on a hot day). 
It was a true test of the cooling /oil control mods and they certainly made big difference!

Enjoy watching me lose 14 concurrent points for the team: 


Unfortunately I only managed 45mins of track time over 3 sessions (20min, 20min, 5min) out of my allotted 90mins before my gearbox let go. Something related to shifter fork resulting in 3rd being neutral quickly followed by all gears neutral, then it being lock in two gears at once and unable to move. Optimistically there were no bad noises. But I am yet to pull box out and diagnose.

Fortunately i was also to snag a tow home while I slapped a permit on the Kiaa which came on a trailer

MYWw4GQ.jpeg

  • Like 1

So, why the penalties and how does the Kia fit into this? Was it bought with the intention of taking it on track?

I'd say the cooling holding up by itself already sounds like a huge win.

It is a team event min 3 cars min 4 drivers, max 6 cars max 6 drivers. One car per team in track at a time. No in car timers allowed. We decided to enter the event and Rhys impulse bought the Kia on their lunch break. 

Regarding scoring, the way we thought it worked was:

set your lap time before the event. 
for your elected time +/- 0.5 sec you get 2 points 

otherwise you get 1 point. 
 

the way it actually worked:

set your time before the event

for your elected time +0.9999 of your time you get 2 points. >1sec slower you get 1 point

Any faster than your elected time at all you get -1 point  

I elected a cruisey 1:27 because there would be traffic and we did not understand the rules . But did 1:22-1:25 all day. Hence penalties. 
 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...

The 32 still sits untouched with the broken gearbox. So a little off topic but not worth having a whole new thread.
The daily starlet has gotten back on the road after 9 months. Suspected blown HeadGasket at a track day resulted in a bit of scope creep rebuild.

The motor got a full tear down, pressure testing, machined for MLS HG, ARP head bolts, new bearings, all new seals etc

ILsCjYS.jpeg

GtlSId7.jpeg

also noticed some fatigue on the stock exhaust manifold so obviously the answer was a steam pipe manifold and highflow turbo.

SACDmTt.jpeg

14ZkRuE.jpeg

The exhaust was also looking tired with some rust holes. So I got a slightly over kill system made up consisting of Vibrant resonator and muffler with a highflow cat.


5LtX9CB.jpeg

ZKadXVI.jpeg

RM1G0SW.jpeg

cb5SOPO.jpeg

ELvZeY6.jpeg

JTJS3jB.jpeg

The new highflow turbo had a larger inlet so instead of adapting the old intake got a case of the might as wells and had a nicer alloy intake made

3FqGIaO.jpeg

CMgIPeB.jpeg

After the run in was finished i bought a (probably considered retro/vintage) EBC becasue "might as well"

iNhu3O9.jpeg

RKBBTzi.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
    • Dang, those BBS are so nice! 
×
×
  • Create New...