Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if it doesn't make what you want.. take it down the road to the next dyno lol and try again.

or put the ambient temp sensor near the exhaust or crank up the ramp rate. Who really knows what makes what.

6266 is a touch smaller in size to a GTX3582 right?

boosted to hell on E85 should push towards 450rwkw I think

if it doesn't make what you want.. take it down the road to the next dyno lol and try again.

or put the ambient temp sensor near the exhaust or crank up the ramp rate. Who really knows what makes what.

6266 is a touch smaller in size to a GTX3582 right?

boosted to hell on E85 should push towards 450rwkw I think

Hi Tim, the turbo is a PT6262 CEA and if I boosted the shit out of it, 450kw on E85 should be easy to get. If I want more, cams/turbo/fuel and away you go to 500awkw + :) but bye bye the street car I want ;(

I know i have said some dumb shit on SAU, but honesty I am not chasing numbers, just want a gutsy street car, shit you can buy cars from the showroom for $50k that will trash old Skylines, new age tech . I have spent more than this modifying my R34GTR and not sure what I will get for my $!

All going well and the water problem sorted , In 5 days I will post the Dyno results, fark I hope it looks good but drives better :)

Yes boozed again, and a free lunch :)

11ty billion.

But srsly, no idea.

Mid 400s.

I think it is it the combination that makes it hard to know what the results will be, plus how the tuner wants to dial in the cams etc?

Does not matter that much, it will be a tough build that can be driven hard :)

Won't rev. Stroke too long Pete!

Depending on where he cams are set and boost pressure, I'm going for 435 kw on E85 at 26 ish psi.

I think it will hit target boost (say 25-26 psi) around 3300-3400 rpm.

I'm gonna say 25@3800-4200 ;)

Soon find out.

Ian is doing 20 psi at 3200 ish with a 6466 1.00 rear on his 3.4. Cams are still at 0-0 and are 270's.

This is a 6262 with a 0.84 rear. Either way it's going to be a rip snorter!

Won't rev. Stroke too long Pete!

Depending on where he cams are set and boost pressure, I'm going for 435 kw on E85 at 26 ish psi.

I think it will hit target boost (say 25-26 psi) around 3300-3400 rpm.

Paul, these Nitto 3.2 strokers can do 10,000rpm + , they are a well balanced unit, what do you mean they cannot rev because the stoke is too long?

They also say they are easy on the cylinders?

Maybe I have believed too much sales talk, but have seen heaps of these 3.2s still going hard at 9,000rpm ?

My reason to do this build was to have a grunty motor that can rev high without going POP!

I think the limiter will be set at 8000rpm ?

What do you think it will do on 98 pump at 25psi, from your guess on E85 , I will give you 390awkw on 98, I really hope you are down by 20kw :)

Now go and cook the snags :action-smiley-069:

I dunno why you'd want to rev it anyway.

The turbo sounds like it's going to choke any top end that's there, and feel like a turbo diesel... You get a great kick in the low-mid range, but the rest is pointless noise and revs.

Anyway. Sounds like that's what you wanted. I really hope (sincerely) that you can enjoy this car, it's what you want, and you don't have any issues with it.

I'll be surprised if you see the north side of 6500 rpm on the street with that combo.

My baby 2.8 and -5's, I pull gears at 6500 and just fall back into the meat.

You will change your driving style, corners where you'd be in 2nd with the 2.6 nugget, you'll do the same in 3rd if not 4th.

Wait and see.

Man you are easy to stir up!

Actually the problem with revving and the stroke is it will sound shit.

I do not get stired, it is all just a laugh but learning shit at the same time , all good Ben :)

By the way, who gives a shit how it sounds, if it is going strong at 8000rpm it can sound like farts, I do not give a shit

Trust me I always have a laugh at ANYTHING fired back at me :)

BUT the info I have gotten from you blokes has been great, thanks

  • Like 1

I'll be surprised if you see the north side of 6500 rpm on the street with that combo.

My baby 2.8 and -5's, I pull gears at 6500 and just fall back into the meat.

You will change your driving style, corners where you'd be in 2nd with the 2.6 nugget, you'll do the same in 3rd if not 4th.

Wait and see.

it is already like that and once tuned should be better, have a guess you pussy :camping:

Well except it wont go over 4800rpm ATM

Mate you have told me how it will be once tuned and I am sure you are right :) yeah pissed but not my fault, someone made me do it :ninja:

I'll be surprised if you see the north side of 6500 rpm on the street with that combo.

My baby 2.8 and -5's, I pull gears at 6500 and just fall back into the meat.

You will change your driving style, corners where you'd be in 2nd with the 2.6 nugget, you'll do the same in 3rd if not 4th.

Wait and see.

I do not live in the City, 3 minutes down the road it is 100, you know that, whoops forgot you come down the ladies road :kiss:

I dunno why you'd want to rev it anyway.

The turbo sounds like it's going to choke any top end that's there, and feel like a turbo diesel... You get a great kick in the low-mid range, but the rest is pointless noise and revs.

Anyway. Sounds like that's what you wanted. I really hope (sincerely) that you can enjoy this car, it's what you want, and you don't have any issues with it.

I will not be revving it crazy , but going to 4500rpm in a 34GTR is boring on a run in tune and after 1500klms I have had enough and looking forward to being able to do a bit more.

Where do you think it is going to choke, 6262 is good for 700hp ? think it should handle 7500rpm ish

Soon find out.

Ian is doing 20 psi at 3200 ish with a 6466 1.00 rear on his 3.4. Cams are still at 0-0 and are 270's.

This is a 6262 with a 0.84 rear. Either way it's going to be a rip snorter!

This is what I'd be basing your response off.

It can't possibly be less responsive.

I'm making 433 @ 22psi on 98 conservatively with a 6466 1.0 on my stroker before 4000rpm too.

Apparently I'm going to need piggaz new gearbox.

I reckon your guesses are pretty close.

This is what I'd be basing your response off.

It can't possibly be less responsive.

I'm making 433 @ 22psi on 98 conservatively with a 6466 1.0 on my stroker before 4000rpm too.

Apparently I'm going to need piggaz new gearbox.

I reckon your guesses are pretty close.

That would be great, hoping for something similar and I would be a happy camper. :yes:

Do you use yours on the street or a bit of both ?

You can have Paul's box for 8 or 10 years and run it in for him while he is looking for a car :)

I reckon it'll pull like a train to 7k, but say if you revved it out to 9k I think it'll feel flat.

But exactly as Paul said, you just adjust your driving to suit.

Yeah, that sounds about right, talking 8000rpm limit setting at this stage but he will see how it goes on the Dyno and work off the graph I guess.

Might need a Helmet to go with the suit :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...