Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Take some spare undies when you next go for a full throttle run after you get the car back Pete. I'm sure you'll need them, just reading the graphs you can see how much of an animal this car has become just from those few changes.

You'll definitely be happy with the choices you made and now you will be able to enjoy the car shortly. Just be careful with all that power you now have.

  • Like 1

Fantastic results from the 6266

I have the same turbo on my built 2.6 and it made 450kw @ 25psi on e85 at Jez

Stroker engine is Realy spinning that turbine hard, love it !!

Can you post up your graph to compare.

It would be a great reference.

Take some spare undies when you next go for a full throttle run after you get the car back Pete. I'm sure you'll need them, just reading the graphs you can see how much of an animal this car has become just from those few changes.

You'll definitely be happy with the choices you made and now you will be able to enjoy the car shortly. Just be careful with all that power you now have.

I am going on a diet so my adult diapers can handle it for a few days.

  • Like 1

Should sent a copy of that dyno to CRD... please explain your shitty tune??? but oh well.. good on ya pete.. glad you finally got the results and thats blood scary looking dyno result lol...

That JEZ... hmmm, one word "respect"... :thumbsup:

  • Like 1

HAHAHAHAHA WHAT THE HELL??????

That required capitals because that is a scary car.

Pete - dont be so quick to defend CRD "build" haha the engineer put the engine together the work shop did the rest and did a piss poor job.

Ran detontation and a leaky manifold etc etc - i would be asking for a refund on the tune at MINIMUM as its $1800 you could buy half a bigger turbo and run 500kw. You're too nice.

they risked the engine with a bad tune IMO. Its simple if it ran pre ignition for a second game over.

Edited by Stixbnr32

HAHAHAHAHA WHAT THE HELL??????

That required capitals because that is a scary car.

Pete - dont be so quick to defend CRD "build" haha the engineer put the engine together the work shop did the rest and did a piss poor job.

Ran detontation and a leaky manifold etc etc - i would be asking for a refund on the tune at MINIMUM as its $1800 you could buy half a bigger turbo and run 500kw. You're too nice.

they risked the engine with a bad tune IMO. Its simple if it ran pre ignition for a second game over.

That pre ignition is a killer

Well there were a few things I was not happy with but that was yesterday and I have moved on, so all good :)

Still smiling, that is were I am at today :cheers:

Cannot wait to pick it up and a 250 Klm trip home :yes:

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
×
×
  • Create New...