Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So they give you a 20% pay cut for 4 years, then pay you 80% in the 5th year when you're not working, presumably when they forecast they'll have no work for you anyway...

Say you're on 100k, they cut that to 80k for 4 years, saving themselves 80k over the 4 years, they then pay you 80k in the fifth year to have the year off... So they've saved themselves $100k per employee, and all you've gained is a year off, with $100k less in your pocket than you would've had on normal terms

Sounds like a good deal...................

Tall them you will do it but you need to take the gap year first then quit before you go back or just get a job somewhere else.

Clearly they will never let you do it that way though

So they give you a 20% pay cut for 4 years, then pay you 80% in the 5th year when you're not working, presumably when they forecast they'll have no work for you anyway...

Say you're on 100k, they cut that to 80k for 4 years, saving themselves 80k over the 4 years, they then pay you 80k in the fifth year to have the year off... So they've saved themselves $100k per employee, and all you've gained is a year off, with $100k less in your pocket than you would've had on normal terms

Sounds like a good deal...................

Take the cynical blinkers off Monica

They haven't saved $100k per employee, they've gotten 4 years of work out of them and paid out $400k either way

And that mere year off could be spent on a beach with a European woman, not stuck in traffic in Tarneit

Tell me someone on 80k is going to happily doing workload of a 100k position?

100k for 5 years = 5 years of work for the company and $500k in your pocket (before tax)
vs
80k for 5 years = 4 years of half-arsed work for the company (They'll need to take on another employee to cover the 5th year so they're out $600 instead of $500k), barely making your house payments if anything goes wrong in your life (sick family, babies, etc).

What happens if situations change and you want to change companies after 3 years? Do they need to pay out 60k pro-rata on your last day? Thats a huge financial liability for the company.

Tell me someone on 80k is going to happily doing workload of a 100k position?

100k for 5 years = 5 years of work for the company and $500k in your pocket (before tax)

vs

80k for 5 years = 4 years of half-arsed work for the company (They'll need to take on another employee to cover the 5th year so they're out $600 instead of $500k), barely making your house payments if anything goes wrong in your life (sick family, babies, etc).

What happens if situations change and you want to change companies after 3 years? Do they need to pay out 60k pro-rata on your last day? Thats a huge financial liability for the company.

Considering last couple companies I worked for complain if you have more than 20 days annual leave owing...1 year hell no

Take the cynical blinkers off Monica

They haven't saved $100k per employee, they've gotten 4 years of work out of them and paid out $400k either way

And that mere year off could be spent on a beach with a European woman, not stuck in traffic in Tarneit

She'll leave you pretty quickly once your 80k runs out and you're sleeping in that same beach permanently

The concept isn't a bad one. It's like working 3 12 hour days a week for 36 hours and then having 4 days off, just on a grander scale.

What if it was 10%, instead of 20%? Having a year paid off ain't such a bad idea, because unlike the VWL regular elite most don't actually plan that well because life tends to get in the way.

Tell me someone on 80k is going to happily doing workload of a 100k position?

100k for 5 years = 5 years of work for the company and $500k in your pocket (before tax)

vs

80k for 5 years = 4 years of half-arsed work for the company (They'll need to take on another employee to cover the 5th year so they're out $600 instead of $500k), barely making your house payments if anything goes wrong in your life (sick family, babies, etc).

What happens if situations change and you want to change companies after 3 years? Do they need to pay out 60k pro-rata on your last day? Thats a huge financial liability for the company.

Company pays you $400k over 5 years as your 5th year is unpaid but supported by the 80k saving you accumulated over the 4 years.

The company will then hire an additional person at $100k. So the end cost is the same for the business. $500k.

She'll leave you pretty quickly once your 80k runs out and you're sleeping in that same beach permanently

Well yeah cos I obviously wouldn't undertake any financial planning or change my lifestyle at all

I should just go to work and take zero risks, what was I thinking

  • Like 1

I went from EBA hourly rate, 40 hour week with fortnightly RDO (paid 36 hours a week)

to

Salary, the worlds most complex over-time system, no RDO's and monthly pay.

to finally

Hourly rate salary, OT penalty rates, no RDO, fortnightly pay.

(^ best). RDO fortnightly was a joke, couldnt run a site properly or finish a job as planned. I prefer the extra paid hours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...