Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They are marketed as road and track but warranted only for road.

The best answer to this is either Dixcel or Project Mu.

And only warranted for 12 months,

Agree that they should be notified for engineering/quality control improvements if possible, saying that would make a pretty cool clock.

Thanks for all the replies. I'm dealing with DBA on the matter now and will let you guys know the outcome after they digest the info which has been requested.

I'm not expecting a replacement set or anything like that from DBA. I'd rather that they can find out what the issue is and tell me if it's the way I drove, a bad batch, or something else so that it can be rectified and doesn't happen to anyone else.

I was lucky that nobody was in front of me at the time who was also in the braking zone, and also lucky that there was heaps of space for me to run off into. I carry a spare set of rotors when tracking so was able to also swap them out pretty easily and drive home.

DBA have form with this for quite a while http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186532-are-you-cracking-dba-rotors/

I spoke with them at the SAU NSW tech night, and they indicated that the metallurgy is strictly specified to give the right balance (for them) of a number of properties. To oversimplfy, you could consider the composition to be either long wear life (hard & brittle) selection, or a short life (soft & tough). IMO DBAs are too far down the hard/brittle end of the spectrum for track use and they shouldn't market their rotors for track.

The cheap arse RDA and D2/G4 etc rotors dont seem to have the same issue.

To the two points I've highlighted in red;

I did a factory tour last year with Members of SAU NSW for one of our most excellent Tech Arvo's organised by the Club Execs.

1; According to DBA; ALL 4000 Series and 5000 Series are cast in a proprietary grade of cast iron in a foundry based in Sydney. This is to guarantee the quality & consistency of their flagship product.

2; In the standard R33 GTS-t rotor size; there is no DBA 2 piece rotor available, so you are left with the 1 piece 4000 series T3 slotted rotor OP has quite reasonably decided to use for trackwork on what I'd assume is a modified STREET CAR, not a dedicated track car.

6 track days and 2000km of street use doesn't "seem" like a great deal of time, and the nature of the failure isn't something that you'd expect; and even DBA suggest that an amount of radial surface cracking in tracked rotors is perfectly normal, and to be expected (as you have also pointed out).

I'd definitely be approaching DBA, and asking for their guidance, and possible ways to move forward; they are (in my experience) excellent to deal with, and are very understanding of enthusiasts who use their product as it was designed.

Simply telling people that they have misused the product and that they should suck eggs is hardly helpful.

Cheers, Dale.

Well being a large account in the brake game i have some DBA senior management on my speed dial....so i made a quick call for clarification from higher up the food chain.

I was told "partially" what i posted over the phone, its all made here and O/S regardless of range...yep i initially thought maybe what i was told in the industry was wrong after what you posted and was preparing to apologize about my post.

So i thought id get some proof for you in writing, obviously having seen the plant, you may have "assumed" its all made here as the senior management pointed out to me.

So i emailed their team anonymously to get it in writing.....i have sent you a copy in your inbox of that whole email ping pong.

Certainly not all made in Australia, as you will see in your message i even tried to weed it down to the T3 or club spec or 2 piece range to say its 100% Australian made, apparently not so.

Not taking away from the brand, they make some good stuff, just clarifying what you didn't know or miss interpreted.

OR maybe senior management and sales team dont know the upper end all made here.

In case you want the china ones direct......

http://zhengnuogroup.en.made-in-china.com/product/NbVmiaIDXyYh/China-Excellent-Dba-Brake-Rotors-for-Australia-Market.html

cleardot.gif
  • Like 1

Well being a large account in the brake game i have some DBA senior management on my speed dial....so i made a quick call for clarification from higher up the food chain.

I was told "partially" what i posted over the phone, its all made here and O/S regardless of range...yep i initially thought maybe what i was told in the industry was wrong after what you posted and was preparing to apologize about my post.

So i thought id get some proof for you in writing, obviously having seen the plant, you may have "assumed" its all made here as the senior management pointed out to me.

So i emailed their team anonymously to get it in writing.....i have sent you a copy in your inbox of that whole email ping pong.

Certainly not all made in Australia, as you will see in your message i even tried to weed it down to the T3 or club spec or 2 piece range to say its 100% Australian made, apparently not so.

Not taking away from the brand, they make some good stuff, just clarifying what you didn't know or miss interpreted.

OR maybe senior management and sales team dont know the upper end all made here.

In case you want the china ones direct......

http://zhengnuogroup.en.made-in-china.com/product/NbVmiaIDXyYh/China-Excellent-Dba-Brake-Rotors-for-Australia-Market.html

cleardot.gif

Hey Peter,

Read your email exchange; thanks for taking the time.

I guess it's like everything now; I'd like to say I'm surprised, but it's more like disappointment really.

Their "Premium product; locally made" quality assertion seems plausible, and as an enthusiast customer, you'd certainly want get behind them.

I took them at their word; perhaps I was being naive, but I did hope they would be honest, not just give us enthusiasts the standard sales guff.

  • Like 1

will this suit your needs? never had a problem with their stuff.

http://www.zshop.ca/parts/r33-performance-friction-front-dimpled-rotors-v-spec-brembo/

The PFC stuff did cross my mind, but it's just so damn expensive. I'm a budget racer so don't think I want to drop that sort of money on a set of rotors!

I'm considering just going for RDA blanks. Expansion and contraction should be better without the slots, they are cheap to run, and more surface area for the pad.

Did DBA get back to you about this?

I've send them photos of the rotor and my phone number which they requested, but that's all unfortunately.

well if you get extra coin, they are worth every coin.

The PFC stuff did cross my mind, but it's just so damn expensive. I'm a budget racer so don't think I want to drop that sort of money on a set of rotors!

I'm considering just going for RDA blanks. Expansion and contraction should be better without the slots, they are cheap to run, and more surface area for the pad.

I've send them photos of the rotor and my phone number which they requested, but that's all unfortunately.

Quick update:

A DBA rep came out to have a look at the rotors today, then took them away for further analysis, and will send me a new set of the same rotors even though the others were well past their warranty period and I have no proof of purchase.
He did say that they have never seen the rotor separate from the hub before, so they wanted to investigate it further internally. Overall happy with their customer service.
  • Like 6

That's the type of service I would hope for from a company like DBA.

It's a strange one, I'm sure tonnes of people are running them without issue.

I've ran mine through hillclimbs, tarmac rally, drifting, time attack events plus 20,000km of street driving too - no issues so far.

You are running a 324mm rotor with a spaced caliper?

That could likely to be a contributor to the cracking due to pad being in a different offset to what it is designed for. You can end up withba higher than ifeal temp differential across the rotor face

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...