Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My experience with a Mainline dyno suggests they can be optimistic and in my case it was a Mainline roller dyno. A Mainline hub dyno would be even more optimistic!

I took my APR Stage 2+ MKV Golf GTI Pirelli to a dyno day a year or so ago and on the Mainline at the workshop hosting the day it produced 212kW at the front wheels.

My regular workshop has a new model Dyno Dynamics and on there it produces 193kW at the wheels

I might take my 33 to the same Mainline... should see a decent 'gain' in power. From 462kW to over 480... heck it could crack 500 on a Mainline hub dyno! [emoji38]

My experience with a Mainline dyno suggests they can be optimistic and in my case it was a Mainline roller dyno. A Mainline hub dyno would be even more optimistic!

I took my APR Stage 2+ MKV Golf GTI Pirelli to a dyno day a year or so ago and on the Mainline at the workshop hosting the day it produced 212kW at the front wheels.

My regular workshop has a new model Dyno Dynamics and on there it produces 193kW at the wheels

I might take my 33 to the same Mainline... should see a decent 'gain' in power. From 462kW to over 480... heck it could crack 500 on a Mainline hub dyno! [emoji38]

See that's interesting cause Insight just changed from a Dyno Dymanics to a Main Line and they have named it the heart braker cause all their cars are reading lower on the ML then they did on the DD

no sir, we have the Aussie calibrations. Made sure of it.

even if you have, it's still a hub dyno which read higher then our roller dynos and quite a bit higher at that.

As everyone has said, go run a mile an hour cause we will never believe a dyno figure from America anyway

A hub dyno bloody well should read higher than a roller dyno. If 25-30% of flywheel horsepower disappears on a roller dyno and the bulk of that is turned into heat at the tyre-roller interface, then banishing that interface should see the 15-20% that is lost there turn back up in the measurement, leaving the expectable ~10%** actual drivetrain loss.

**note that even 10% is probably a bit high for real drivetrain losses. That much power turned into heat inside transmission and diff housings will boil oil pretty quickly.

Weather should be good over there now. Time to go to the track and show us some time slips. We can sit here and argue for an eternity or u can do a few a few passes and u will then either be crowned the king of -5's or be flamed for the rest of your days. Good luck either way [emoji3]

hmm I know this is sAU but there is still a bit of arrogance in implying that our dynos are accurate and american ones are not because they read higher. Perhaps our just read lower than normal, it depends where you stand.

BTW I am pretty sure our 400m is shorter than a 1/4 mile too....

  • Like 1

Rightio, coming from a mainline owner, the 4wd roller we have IS the heartbreaker. Why? Because we don't park air temp sensors where they shouldn't be, we REGULARLY have the dyno and retardation units checked and calibrated and we don't give a single fcuk, weather its flying or not, about a final hp figure on a dyno. Its a tuning tool, not a sales pitch like so many shops will make it. MPH and weight don't lie, ever. If you want to make 600whp from your cammed, unported, stock headered ve, you came to the wrong place. This is as far as this needs to go, so mr OP, what mph and weight did this car run, and if you want to be technical, give us track temp, elevation and humidity.

  • Like 2

Over the years I like many other have watched/read with interest the different hp outputs that overseas dynos read vs our own readings.

I do remember seeing somewhere that US chassis dyno readings will usually give readings that reflect flywheel HP so that they are easier to interpret (Keep in mind I can't confirm this info so please, no flamage heheh).

The only true way to measure the HP and torque of an engine is to stick it on an engine dyno.

No drivetrain to get in the way, or rollers etc.

Oh and also the black top (QTR mile, 400m) as mentioned will give a good indication of HP after a few simple calculations :)

But of course it isn't always practical hey?....

hmm I know this is sAU but there is still a bit of arrogance in implying that our dynos are accurate and american ones are not because they read higher. Perhaps our just read lower than normal, it depends where you stand.

BTW I am pretty sure our 400m is shorter than a 1/4 mile too....

I fairly sure the debate is which reads higher/lower more then which is accurate

Iirc it is the US drag strips that where shortened to 1000f for the biggest cars, not sure what class it called but I think it top alcohol or something like that, to lower trap speeds which where getting out of hand

What Sean said is something I have heard also, the US dynos are calibrated to reflect FW horse power where AUS dynos are set for RW hp

I am of the opinion, like many others involved in this conversation, that a dyno is nothing more than a handy tool to have when working on automobiles. A peak horsepower number is simply a rough guide, that really only forms part of the picture. A time slip is far more valuable when assessing the merits of a car and the level of engine modifications performed.

Elapsed Time, 60ft time, 330ft, 660ft, 1320ft (402m) speeds and times, Terminal Speed, and finally vehicle weight when assessed in combination leave very little left to interpretation.

So by all means, run the subject car on a dyno using Australian calibration data (whatever that is!? Given they seem to vary wildly btw different workshops let alone dyno brands!) but it will bring us no closer to a definitive answer. Run the car at a drag strip and post the time slip and settle the score once and for all.

Let me just be clear here, I am not saying the car isn't producing the numbers that are being claimed. I'm merely stating that a dyno number doesn't settle the argument one way or the other. A time slip in combo' with vehicle mass will.

See that's interesting cause Insight just changed from a Dyno Dymanics to a Main Line and they have named it the heart braker cause all their cars are reading lower on the ML then they did on the DD

A number of years ago I attended a dyno day with my R33 at a workshop with a Mainline roller dyno. I ended up winning the event with a relatively tame (by today's standards) 366kW at the rear wheels. A few days later I put in on the Dyno Dynamics dyno at my regular workshop where it produced 345.7kW. Nothing changed btw the two dyno sessions, even the weather remained largely the same, baro pressure included. That's not to say all DD dynos read lower than MD dynos, merely these two relative to one another. With a small gain in power at the wheels (30 odd kW) the car trapped a smidge under 129mph on a 12.2 sec pass and 2.4 60ft. The car weighed in at roughly 1580kg, including stereo gear, 1/2 tank, me (90kg) and a few extras like chassis bracing, heavy battery etc
  • Like 1

A number of years ago I attended a dyno day with my R33 at a workshop with a Mainline roller dyno. I ended up winning the event with a relatively tame (by today's standards) 366kW at the rear wheels. A few days later I put in on the Dyno Dynamics dyno at my regular workshop where it produced 345.7kW. Nothing changed btw the two dyno sessions, even the weather remained largely the same, baro pressure included. That's not to say all DD dynos read lower than MD dynos, merely these two relative to one another. With a small gain in power at the wheels (30 odd kW) the car trapped a smidge under 129mph on a 12.2 sec pass and 2.4 60ft. The car weighed in at roughly 1580kg, including stereo gear, 1/2 tank, me (90kg) and a few extras like chassis bracing, heavy battery etc

I don't doubt it, my point but which I realise I didn't make very clear was it doesn't matter which brand or even the same brand they all read different and realisticly nothing more then a tuning tool that gives a rough idea of actual power

If someone wants to compair his/her power against a freinds the only ways to do it is roll one off the dyno and roll the other one on the same dyno and strap it done the exact same way and even then there will be slight variation or make the two weigh the same and head to the drag strip

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • My experience with Rising Sun Exports Before agreeing to the sale I tried to do as much research as I could (obviously), his Facebook reviews are 98% and he goes Live at least once or twice a week. I contacted 2 people in the UK who had used him for their imports, both had positive feedback. His explanation and talk through of the import process was thorough, answering any query no matter how stupid it was. It felt as soon as the money was sent, communication dropped off. I asked for shipping updates every 2 weeks or so, not wanting to pester him, he never had any updates. I wasn't informed the car had been dropped off at the port, I only found out by his Facebook story. I asked for the photos taken at the port, knowing he would need some for insurance purposes. I received a few 5 second clips and that's it. When asked again, he said his staff had them. Weeks later I asked again, he tells me he doesn't have any, but does have 50 photos from the original advert. I never received them. I eventually got the documents sent via WhatsApp after I mentioned the port was requesting them. I purchased a CarVX report, to find out the vehicle is a Grade R with recorded accident damage, first recorded in 2017 when it was first auctioned. He never told me the grade, then again I didn't ask. His response was "Grade R means nothing, it wasn't chassis damage". Still, I would have liked to have been informed about it. Jon prides himself on being open and honest when it comes to inspecting cars, it's his main job doing so at the auctions for customers. When the vehicle arrived in the UK I noticed a few little cosmetic issues. It's a 21 year old car so it wasn't going to be mint condition. The side skirts are cracked on each corner and the sealant is failing. The front grill on the bonnet/hood isn't secured very well, mounting studs are missing. Both minor things, but again, it would have been nice to be told. During a Facebook Live walk around video of the vehicle, he mentioned it has a front Whiteline anti roll bar/sway bar. While on the inspection ramp, I noticed the stock item has been installed. When first questioned, his response was "the ARB? Switched? Since when, it never had them". Since sending video and photo evidence I've not received a response. I'm probably being over critical of the overall condition of an old car, but all I wanted was honesty (which he claims to have). I'm aware I wasn't his only customer, he's busy doing XYZ but other reviews praise him for great communication with regular updates and photos, I felt I didn't receive the same treatment. 
    • I was able to get some underside photos while the car was on the ramp The suspension is all Altezza/IS200/IS300 so getting part's will hopefully be less of a headache
    • Welcome to my 2004 Toyota Mark ii IR-V Fortuna (series 2) With a 1JZ-GTE powerplant under the bonnet (hood) it'll give me plenty of scope for power upgrades. For those who aren't familiar with imports, the 1JZ-GTE is a 2.5L 6 cylinder VVTi engine with a single turbocharger. This has the factory R154 5 speed gearbox, along with a aftermarket 2 way LSD differential (brand unknown). Under the arches are a set of CST Zero 1 alloys, 18x9 +30 225/40 up front and 18x9.5 +15 265/35 on the rear. The car was quite low in Japan and there's evidence of the wheels catching the rolled arches/fenders. The tyre's aren't great so I'm in two minds whether to replace both or just the tyres and put up with the wider wheels on the rear. The car still uses stock brakes with the addition of some braided hoses. The exterior is stock with the exception of a BN Sports front bumper and a replacement Fortuna grill  Moving to the interior, the steering wheel has been replaced with a dished MOMO steering wheel (which will get swapped for my Momo Tuner for the time being) Defi Link Gauges are mounted above the climate controls and on the A pillar, the Oil Temp,Oil Pressure,Water Temp and Boost gauges should help with spirited and track driving  The stock seats have been replaced with some retrimmed Recaro bucket seats. Being a larger build these are a little snug, unfortunately the orange isn't for me so I'll look into replacing these down the line. Other modifications include a twin plate clutch, Blitz intercooler, Evolve alloy radiator, a stainless exhaust with decat, HKS EVC-S boost controller and coil overs
    • Apologies for the long read My R34 GTT was up for sale at the beginning of spring due to a few repairs creeping up. The strut tops needed replacing, roof and bonnet (hood) painting (yay for 3 stage pearl) and the underside stripped and treated. I sold the car which allowed me to be in a much better place financially. Leading up to the sale I was already thinking about the replacement. In an ideal world it needed to be a good all-rounder. Something I can mess around with, modify, do track days, do the school run, go on long drives etc.  Options included but not limited to... Laurel C35, Evo 8/9, Civic FD2, Impreza Hawkeye, Aristo and even an Audi S4 Avant (I've already got the Mazda 6 wagon). But there was always one car at the top of the list The Toyota Mark ii JZX110 I found an advert on a Facebook group for an example in Japan, from a seller called Jon at Rising Sun Exports. A few messages back and forth and Jon calls me from Yokohama one morning (or afternoon in his case). He briefly explained the import process, the costs involved and a repeat of the advert. After much deliberation, the price was agreed and the sale was locked in. I've never imported a vehicle so I jumped into the unknown head first. The money transfer was completed through wise.com (fees apply), very easy to use and the money was with him within a day or two.  The car suspension was raised for the vessel and the car dropped off at the port. It was 7 weeks later when the bill of lading was received and the freight invoice sent to me, followed by the export certificate a couple of days after (both digital copies) In the mean time the port had been in contact. I needed an agent to deal with the NOVA (notification of vehicle arrival) along with the tax/duty invoice, this was £75.00. The port also had a fee of £100, I'm guessing to cover the cost of the 10 day 'free storage' and for moving the car off the boat etc. They need a copy of the vehicle invoice, freight invoice and export certificate to allow the vehicle to pass through customs. The vessel arrived on Tuesday 5th August, the tax/duty invoice was generated and sent over. This is generally tax 20% and duty 10% of the vehicle value. Although the invoice came in at a higher amount than I had calculated. Once HMRC had received the payment the vehicle could be released from customs. I thought once the tax/duty was paid you could collect at any point, that's not the case. Your agent will need to book a collection slot, I requested Thursday 7th which was accepted, with a 9:00am slot allocated. It was a 5:00am start from Norfolk heading to Southampton. We eventually found the compound, upon presenting the bill of lading and some ID they released the car (they drove it out of the compound to the front ready for us to load up). The email from the port stated each slot had a 10 minute window, which seemed abit farfetched but the staff said it's not a strict rule. We were there for approx. 30-40 mins in total. A week prior to collecting I contacted my garage and explained the situation, I was able to get an inspection slot that afternoon. For the registration, DVLA require the car to be insured, for this I used a company called Adrian Flux who can insure the vehicle using the VIN number. 
    • Hey guys, looking for these side skirts if anyone can help me out. 
×
×
  • Create New...