Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb 2860-5 Highest Hp?


Jc052685

Recommended Posts

Yeah dur! Lol

I've been saying twins are gay since 2008. Piggaz can back me up on this!

I actually like my car looking bone stock as I have too much respect for the R32 GTR so you won't find me putting a single on.

I love the twins.

In terms of gay, I find brotheled engine bays with China blue silicone hoses and shiny shit gay.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like my car looking bone stock as I have too much respect for the R32 GTR so you won't find me putting a single on.

I love the twins.

In terms of gay, I find brotheled engine bays with China blue silicone hoses and shiny shit gay.

Give it a few years, you'll cave :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give it a few years, you'll cave :)

Pointless I reckon unless your competing of course and have a box worth more than your car holding it all together.

Besides when cops defect your gate, you'll probably cave and put twins back on.

Edited by mr skidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pointless I reckon unless your competing of course and have a box worth more than your car holding it all together.

Besides when cops defect your gate, you'll probably cave and put twins back on.

Meh, get it engineered then.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Tuff.

Is that the same car that went to tsukuba circuit and had it dynoed in Japan and it made like 800 horsepower on Japanese Dyno

That was their previous R32 GTR, had -5s on that car too.

Around the 4:13 mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it's on an American hub dyno, should make close to 2000hp out of the factory

I've actually NEVER seen an American hub dyno in person!

This being said, I have personally seen skewed dyno numbers at a roller dyno before where the dyno was calibrated incorrectly. Some guy had a stock-ish 2013 gt500 and it supposedly made 625 or so RWHP which I thought was ridiculous. I was the next car inline for the dyno and when we put my old 1994 Twin turbo Supra on it (boost control and downpipe only - I mean it all other parts bone stock down to the stock paper toyota filter) and it made 515 whp!! I told them something was WAY wrong and they recalibrated and my car did 366 whp which is WAY more on target. The Mustang guy, on the other hand, bragged for months about his being the highest stock GT500 in the country...I lol'd.

I agree - we will have dyno numbers coupled with Haltech logs from my car (street pulls in let's say 4th gear) which is a great indicator of available horsepower soon enough. A log with time v velocity should be a pretty universal comparison assuming it's the same gearing and tire diameters. Heck I'd even film it and give a GPS speed if that would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a Mainline..... Straight from "down under".

Still have the dyno builder here setting it up.

hub dynos read high anyway and as we've said they are going to put the American program in it to match up with your dynos 170F170C-5AAD-4254-AABB-AADBC25AF89D.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually NEVER seen an American hub dyno in person!

This being said, I have personally seen skewed dyno numbers at a roller dyno before where the dyno was calibrated incorrectly. Some guy had a stock-ish 2013 gt500 and it supposedly made 625 or so RWHP which I thought was ridiculous. I was the next car inline for the dyno and when we put my old 1994 Twin turbo Supra on it (boost control and downpipe only - I mean it all other parts bone stock down to the stock paper toyota filter) and it made 515 whp!! I told them something was WAY wrong and they recalibrated and my car did 366 whp which is WAY more on target. The Mustang guy, on the other hand, bragged for months about his being the highest stock GT500 in the country...I lol'd.

I agree - we will have dyno numbers coupled with Haltech logs from my car (street pulls in let's say 4th gear) which is a great indicator of available horsepower soon enough. A log with time v velocity should be a pretty universal comparison assuming it's the same gearing and tire diameters. Heck I'd even film it and give a GPS speed if that would help.

on our dynos you would not even make your 366whp with that car, to be honest you'd probably be getting closer to 300
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...