Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, mr skidz said:

Wonder why type A cams never get much consideration?
To date my smaller 2.7L is producing 20psi on 98ron earlier than 2.8L's on E85 with the same turbos.
Which is something to think about.

I get positive boost from 1,500rpm and starts pulling from 2,500 rpm which is where you want your cams to operate.

 


My boost plotted againt Paul's and biggest difference is cams and lack of head work on my part.
3b8b670bc05fbbf0b381dc6391478d10.jpg

 

 

Is boost pressure alone giving the full story of how much power the engine is actually making?

 

 

Good to see SAU never changes lol

I did type Bs to type Rs on a 2.6 with -7s, both sets dialed for response and both sets made same topend power but the type Rs hit full boost about 800rpm sooner 

I can't comment on V stock cams as I never used them in my 34 but the stock cams in my 32 dialed for response easy smacked the 34 for bottom end but when you take into account stock turbos and 4.11 diffs it's not comparable in the slightest  

The Type Rs on a 3.0 with RSs went 458awkw@28psi and I have since gone EU 260 cams and Audi R8 coils and .5mm over size in piston with .2 increase in CR, latest graph below

I am interested in your graph of pods V airbox for a R34 as we have hit a wall with boost and my tuner believes it's an intake restriction

I think dialed in the type Rs will give a better result then stock but the best question is will the result be worth the expense 

image.jpeg

  • Like 3

The graph I posted earlier, was with pods. I dont have a specific airbox vs pods back to back graph, but I was there and fitted them myself then spun it up.

14rkw, on boost sooner, and held boost easier.

Nothing else was changed between runs other than pods.

We had tuned for a new plazaman and gained some power and response, but the pods was done separately.

  • Like 1
38 minutes ago, ActionDan said:

The graph I posted earlier, was with pods. I dont have a specific airbox vs pods back to back graph, but I was there and fitted them myself then spun it up.

14rkw, on boost sooner, and held boost easier.

Nothing else was changed between runs other than pods.

We had tuned for a new plazaman and gained some power and response, but the pods was done separately.
 

Ok interesting, did you remove the bung from the feed that goes into the side guard ?

what have you changed on the intake, just airbox or intake pipes as well ?

I still run stock airbox and stock piping and curious of what parts create how much restriction 

Yes it had already been removed and I was running an apexi panel filter.

Nothing else was changed, literally just bolted on pods.

I have since changed to AFM deletes and KTS hard suction pipes but that was more for aesthetics.

I'm waiting on camtech to get back to me. 

Does anyone know what the max lift is you can go before requiring buckets? 

I was wondering if they could make me a 248 or 250 duration with a bit more lift, if possible. If no more lift can be achieved, then maybe just a 248 with the same lift. 

I'm inclined to wanna test cams, as I got a good result with the Sil, but I alos came to the realisation I've had the car for almost a year, spent over 20k on it and barely driven it. So Cams might get shelved for a while given the nicer weather is here and I should actually drive the thing and enjoy it. 

I still need to get the rims resprayed, and maybe get the calipers re-done, but again I should drive it for a bit. 

Admittedly from a guy who sells Cams, but interesting response. 

************

He recommended their 260 cam - http://www.camtechcams.com.au/niss_6cyl_rb26.html

"Hi Dan,

 

The cams to use is our 413a. see cam specs below."

*********

Which I thought was too big based on what we've discussed here and asked him  what he thought.

*********


" Hi Malcolm,

 
I've been told that's too much duration and will cost me response, potentially down low and mid range torque also due to overlap dropping dynamic compression. 
 
Thoughts? 


*********


He doesn't agree....

*********

"Hi Dan,

 

I think unfortunately the people that are giving you advise may be a little inexperienced.

 

The cam I suggested is the next size bigger than standard.

 

If you put anything smaller than want I have recommended you are wasting your time."

*********

Which is odd given I asked him specifically about the 250 degree Type R. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...