Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

 

18 hours ago, morboost said:

which 3" exhaust do you have?

It’s a fabbed 3in downpipe to a 3in ISR (cheap) catback. It’s all straight pipe and 1 can at the rear. 
 

I have found several examples of the same turbo making more power on less boost with 98 RON or similar (non ethanol) fuels. But, maybe I am wrong or getting bad info. 19 psi seems like a lot for that power. 

1 hour ago, Tillis3 said:

 

It’s a fabbed 3in downpipe to a 3in ISR (cheap) catback. It’s all straight pipe and 1 can at the rear. 
 

I have found several examples of the same turbo making more power on less boost with 98 RON or similar (non ethanol) fuels. But, maybe I am wrong or getting bad info. 19 psi seems like a lot for that power. 

Pull off your front timing cover and see if the intake & exhaust cam is in the right spot vs. the crank pulley

Easy check

  • Thanks 1
On 3/31/2024 at 11:08 PM, Kinkstaah said:

Also yeah, that is a reasonably good result for petrol at 19psi. I'd say this is working as one would expect. If you dialled in 25psi into it it may be interesting to see what it'd do, but because you're on 93 (hello USA) the answer is probably knock.

Almost all of the results you read here are on E85, which makes dramatic differences.

98RON (EU) = 93AKI (NA). We also have 94AKI in Canada which is 101.5RON. In the US. they have E85 unlike us in Canada. 

Sorry yea - I know 93 = 98 = Premium, I only said Hello USA because that's how people use the term, nobody down under refers to anything 93 :D

But I was wrong, and it was Canada, aye. So hello, better USA.

19 hours ago, TurboTapin said:

98RON (EU) = 93AKI (NA). We also have 94AKI in Canada which is 101.5RON. In the US. they have E85 unlike us in Canada. 

damn no e85, the only reason Australia has it GM (holden) did a deal with caltex (a fuel company) to supply a e85 for a flex fuel domestic model car. The car was a dud as owners where using 30% more fuel in a non performance application and just started filling the car with regular unleaded. The car company went broke and the fuel company stopped selling it. Thankfully another fuel company started selling e85 as the performance benefits had been realised in boosted application its ozzy 98ron with 15% ethanol, loves boost and timing.

1 hour ago, morboost said:

damn no e85, the only reason Australia has it GM (holden) did a deal with caltex (a fuel company) to supply a e85 for a flex fuel domestic model car. The car was a dud as owners where using 30% more fuel in a non performance application and just started filling the car with regular unleaded. The car company went broke and the fuel company stopped selling it. Thankfully another fuel company started selling e85 as the performance benefits had been realised in boosted application its ozzy 98ron with 15% ethanol, loves boost and timing.

We don't have E85 at the pump due to our winters. It wouldn't be pretty. But most of our petrol is an E15 mix. 

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

I have done a lot of reading but still just as confused as when I started!!

RB25det (neo)
Forged internals, all the other good stuff.
Haltech ECU.
Plazmaman plenum with factor runners, DBW 68mm throttle body.
98 pump gas
Should be capable of revving to 9k.

Going to be used for mostly road/odd track day, 500WHP target. Looking at a Artec manifold with G30-770 but with the reading I have done, a lot of people recommend twin scroll. Not a lot of options with the G series when going to twin scroll. Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

With response being important for drivability on the road, not top-end HP (while still important), what do people recommend for turbo? I like how easy the V-band g-series look and am keen on a g-series but not 100% sold.

Also, recommendations for an intercooler. Historically I've always run cheap large ones but looking for something smaller and more efficient, capable of flowing the 500WHP.

Thanks

On 23/06/2024 at 1:19 PM, BiZbAiRd said:

Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

odd thing for a turbo manufacturer to say, the proof if there, twin scroll always performs better, sure non twin scroll and twin scroll you'll end up at the same overall peak power, however a street car/track car needs a wide powerband unlike a drag car.

In terms of intercooler, a good one goes a long way. For reference (I've posted it somewhere here the data) I had an older HDi Core (pre dates the GT2 style cores, they seem decent!) and my runs were peaking over 60 degrees Celsius, went to a Plazmaman Pro Series 76mm core and temps dropped down to the mid 30s. Similar ambient temp, similar motor build, same turbo setup, same exhaust system, mostly same IC pipework.

On 23/06/2024 at 3:19 PM, BiZbAiRd said:

Not a lot of options with the G series when going to twin scroll. Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll?

I've never seen Garrett say not to worry about twin scroll - they have twin scroll options for all their G and GT series turbines from the 30 series up.  

What kind of dyno are you expecting to be making 500whp on?  So far it sounds more or less like you're doing a G30-770 kind of setup, and realistically an open housing will be good response etc

Hi Lithium,

I have heard a couple people say, Garrett say with the smaller G-series twin scroll is not require and I have assumed this is the case, based on the lack of twin scroll availability. Garrett only do a T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r, which I feel is too big for an RB25 for my use case? Yes, I was certainly thinking the G30-770 but was concerned about the lack of twin scroll.

The 500whp isn't the critical part, it's a 'build for this power' and hopefully get there. More important are drivability and response.

Regards

18 hours ago, BiZbAiRd said:

Garrett only do a T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r, which I feel is too big for an RB25 for my use case? Yes, I was certainly thinking the G30-770 but was concerned about the lack of twin scroll

G30-770 with their 1.06 a/r twinscroll housing is an awesome combination.  Will be over the moon with that on a properly configured RB25

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, BiZbAiRd said:

Would you expect to see 500whp from the g30-770 1.06a/r twin scroll T4? I  feel like it's to big for a primarily street application?

Its just big enough for what you are trying. I would not go any smaller. your compressor map is right in the middle. I have a g35-900 for my 30/25 build and looking to get 550-600 with out going above 1.5 bar 

  • Like 1

Thanks @waxracing

Turns out G30-770 T4 twin scroll 1.06a/r isn't available for reverse rotation. So really, the only real question is, will the G30-770 v-band .83a/r produce 500whp on pump gas? If it's unlikely, should I go to G30-770 1.01a/r, G30-900 .83a/r or G35-900 .83a/r? Or any other combination...

Well if you look at the compressor map I would say that the g35-900 will do it alot easier and be in a better efficiency range. In regard to throttle response and boost threshold, I doubt you would feel the difference but obviously there will be one. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...