Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another fix for something that was bugging me on this car ever since we got it - the RH front indicator. Some genius decided to stick an R32 GTSt indicator in it at some stage. Don't do this as the fitment is terrible - it makes the indicator inner edge protrude about 10mm too far forward compared to the headlight, as they are not the same shape as a GTR housing.

Not to mention the orange colour is also completely different on a GTR one - the GTR one is a lot lighter. For comparison, zoom in:

Existing white 32 with wrong gts indicator:

403924027_20220103_1520072.thumb.jpg.1b6eb56f1273773c3d36564eac2fcbe3.jpg

My blue 32 with correct GTR indicator:

942379341_IMG_20210320_143126_12.thumb.jpg.7d840ee0bebb8a47380f4553c4b1ea84.jpg

Just Jap to the rescue with an actual new discontinued original Nissan, not Nismo heritage, full GTR indicator with wiring harness. The Nismo one now only comes without wiring, as the harness is discontinued completely now with no replacement.

20220222_193000.thumb.jpg.2b072f005de36f22d15cc54e2f898f8b.jpg

Gts vs GTR

383771455_20220222_1929472.thumb.jpg.c87b108d83088c45bd25266852ee6283.jpg

  • Like 1
On 22/02/2022 at 3:19 AM, BK said:

FU dead crank and bearings.

 

20220222_184728.jpg

20220222_184743.jpg

20220222_184735.jpg

another rb crank to the bin...hope shes back together soonish. do you have a block for it yet?

On 23/02/2022 at 11:43 PM, MoMnDadGTR said:

another rb crank to the bin...hope shes back together soonish. do you have a block for it yet?

Block is fine and will be reused, just needs a proper oil gallery clean out. Knocked out the 2 front and rear oil gallery plugs yesterday, tapped the block and converted them 1/4 NPT grub screws. Hopefully get the sump away to Hi octane today to be modified and already pulled down the Nitto pump and cleaned it out / replaced backing plate screws.

Still aiming for mid year back on road.

  • Like 2
On 23/02/2022 at 5:05 PM, BK said:

Block is fine and will be reused, just needs a proper oil gallery clean out. Knocked out the 2 front and rear oil gallery plugs yesterday, tapped the block and converted them 1/4 NPT grub screws. Hopefully get the sump away to Hi octane today to be modified and already pulled down the Nitto pump and cleaned it out / replaced backing plate screws.

Still aiming for mid year back on road.

i had the hi octane one on my last setup mate. i went with this 8L leask spec sump this go around. took longer to clean it then weld it up. rebuilt with new seals and drill out the oil passages with a healthy long ass bit, done. The reason I went with the LeaskSpec sump is because it sits above the cross member still and you can still service your diff(barely). you dont have to modifiy your oil pickup height either. you do have to buy a Tomei oil baffle kit as well. though thats the kicker. comes with some convenient 10an spots for drains on each side of engine for your rear head drain/turbo drain/ and if needed a catchcan drain back to sump. cheers mate.

leakspec sump.jpg

Edited by MoMnDadGTR

The Hi octane one is not supposed to be too much lower than the crossmember at all. I've had a Trust one and they are stupid low. Not sure I really like that design above TBH compared to a Hi Octane or Lewis one, and the Tomei baffle kit is not as good as a swing gated sump baffle with their rubber flaps.

We're getting the Hi Octane cast version with the 3 swing gate baffle design as part of the sump pan, which is still going to be about a 6 week turn around time from Hi octane themselves doing the fabrication.

I have the Lewis engines 8.5 - 9L fabricated sump on my blue 32. Easily gets the front diff centre out and is pretty much level with the cross member. Has the 4 swing gated baffle design using the stock top baffle plate which is far, far better to the Trust or Tomei baffle setups. I'd get another one as I actually think his is the superior overall design to anyone else and reasonably priced - but Darren takes ages, doesn't answer his phone and hardly replies to emails so getting one is a full on mission.

My last sump from Darren was nearly a six month wait, but it is good and he is very good at what he does.

IMG_20201212_140857_7.thumb.jpg.f52a38f431fd49bcf97ce9ee91546804.jpg

IMG-20220216-WA0000.thumb.jpg.633657368fb266fa6687e4d304e47549.jpgIMG-20220117-WA0003.thumb.jpg.59382545bcd8c8c5948a4283580c6336.jpgIMG-20220117-WA0002.thumb.jpg.2f34b51bef353bd7a0c83d91d9a5b31f.jpg

 

Since its being discussed, here's a few pics of the hioctane sump extension going on my car this week to replace the RIPS sump it had.

Hoping the swing gates and bit of extra depth will control the oil surge a bit better. To trust sump was worked perfectly by too little ground clearance for me in the long run.

On 24/02/2022 at 5:28 PM, BK said:

The Hi octane one is not supposed to be too much lower than the crossmember at all. I've had a Trust one and they are stupid low. Not sure I really like that design above TBH compared to a Hi Octane or Lewis one, and the Tomei baffle kit is not as good as a swing gated sump baffle with their rubber flaps.

We're getting the Hi Octane cast version with the 3 swing gate baffle design as part of the sump pan, which is still going to be about a 6 week turn around time from Hi octane themselves doing the fabrication.

I have the Lewis engines 8.5 - 9L fabricated sump on my blue 32. Easily gets the front diff centre out and is pretty much level with the cross member. Has the 4 swing gated baffle design using the stock top baffle plate which is far, far better to the Trust or Tomei baffle setups. I'd get another one as I actually think his is the superior overall design to anyone else and reasonably priced - but Darren takes ages, doesn't answer his phone and hardly replies to emails so getting one is a full on mission.

My last sump from Darren was nearly a six month wait, but it is good and he is very good at what he does.

IMG_20201212_140857_7.thumb.jpg.f52a38f431fd49bcf97ce9ee91546804.jpg

Yeah that’s a beefy sump Mate. I wouldn’t dare disagree with someone of your knowledge hell you helped me with most my car in the nitty griddy and appreciative every time I fire her up. That being said I do like the way how tucked the leaskspec sump is. Each to there own tho forsure that sump you have looks solid as hell and like you stated swing gate baffles. Here is a picture of my sump finished. It was a big deal for me to have the sump nice and tucked as my wife drives the car often and our roads are fricken awful. I would like to make My own baffles with gates likes yours. Cheers buddy.

49F1D226-A691-47DB-B8D7-1DC3A01FBF7B.jpeg

867D5C5C-B1CC-419E-B154-1B47C625C9C8.jpeg

311BF0DC-A2FA-4E60-ABF7-A2B226F18F33.jpeg

Well you definitely have ground clearance with that.

Used to think this was on the great on the 32, but it seems a completely pointless modification now

image.png.8f3a50f0b985fe642746d8fe7dda8b7f.png

image.png.de366f9ec1db36cbe2bd95e2741ba44b.png

image.png.456181c4b0995c0a6c0675f4b1eca688.png

 

Too low, not swing gated and really doesn't add enough extra capacity for the effort and cost.

 

Yeah I used to run the trust sump on the race car but you just cant have anything below the cross member for race/rally use. I hit it so hard on the curbs at Oran Park that I knocked the sump plug out and cracked it in multiple places.

I also use the high octane one now and even in the recent off road excursion there was no damage to the sump

  • Like 1
On 25/02/2022 at 7:06 PM, BK said:

Well you definitely have ground clearance with that.

Used to think this was on the great on the 32, but it seems a completely pointless modification now

image.png.8f3a50f0b985fe642746d8fe7dda8b7f.png

image.png.de366f9ec1db36cbe2bd95e2741ba44b.png

image.png.456181c4b0995c0a6c0675f4b1eca688.png

 

Too low, not swing gated and really doesn't add enough extra capacity for the effort and cost.

 

yeah those sumps are bin worthy for sure mate. after dialing the tig i feel like a wanker for not building my own sump extensions with its own baffle gate system. i could of made something better/bigger. all aside mate hope the build goes well, im just itching to drive the gtr we have 6 feet of snow and was -49 celcius today. bunged.

Reassuring to hear you rate the hioctane sump Duncan - no one in the uk has heard of them as far as i can tell.

The RIPS sump is shallow and safely tucked and it does seem to fix the straightline oil surge you get with a stock sump but I was still getting oil pressure drops in long, high g, high rev left handers.

My ecu has a very conservative oil pressure cut set up so I've not had a failure with the RIPS sump yet, but I does hit the ecu cut occasionally once the oil's hot and the boost is turned up.

The Trust sump actually seemed to work better in that respect but you could see it was just a matter or time until you run a sausage curb at the wrong angle and rip it off. Hopefully the hioctane cast sump is a good mix of the two; decent capacity, a bit deep, with flappy gates.

  • 2 weeks later...

A few updates are in for this one on progress-

Sump finally arrived at Hi Octane to be modified and bottom end parts from Golebys have arrived along with the turbo.

In the end went with the Precision ball bearing PT6266 CEA with S ported compressor and T4 divided 0.84 a/r turbine housing, so goodbye Trust T78-29D.

  • Like 2
On 09/03/2022 at 2:51 PM, BK said:

A few updates are in for this one on progress-

Sump finally arrived at Hi Octane to be modified and bottom end parts from Golebys have arrived along with the turbo.

In the end went with the Precision ball bearing PT6266 CEA with S ported compressor and T4 divided 0.84 a/r turbine housing, so goodbye Trust T78-29D.

Welcome to the 2020's!  Should be an awesome car with the 6266.  I think it's a well balanced turbo with good response at the sacrifice of a bit of top end (which apart from Insta who cares...).  What are you hoping/expecting power wise, around 400-450kW or are they pushing more now?

  • Like 1

Just run an oil filter and an oil pressure regulator for the turbo and enjoy many years of fun. At least it won't spit out turbine wheels if you run too much boost or run them on a hot day or hit the limiter or yell at your car.

On 10/03/2022 at 7:19 AM, Shoota_77 said:

Welcome to the 2020's!  Should be an awesome car with the 6266.  I think it's a well balanced turbo with good response at the sacrifice of a bit of top end (which apart from Insta who cares...).  What are you hoping/expecting power wise, around 400-450kW or are they pushing more now?

Well since my blue 32 with the 2.8 is doing 460kw on 98 at 22psi and 610kw on E85 at 32psi with the 6466, I would expect on the 2.6 with the 6266 to do about 400kw on 98 and up to 500kw on E85 at similar boost levels. Definitely won't have the top end of the 6466 but would expect at least 130mph on the 1/4.

On 10/03/2022 at 8:00 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Just run an oil filter and an oil pressure regulator for the turbo and enjoy many years of fun. At least it won't spit out turbine wheels if you run too much boost or run them on a hot day or hit the limiter or yell at your car.

That's a definite on the oil feed filter and do that already, but I'm not completely sold you NEED an oil pressure regulator. I don't with the 6466 on high oil pressure with a Nitto pump. I've defintely looked into it, but I think you'll find most problems are caused by undersized turbo oil returns rather than too much pressure and is the cause of most Precision turbo hate.

Look at anyone running an AN10 braided return and that is far too small under even normal conditions, as the inside hole size at the end of a male AN10 flare fitting is smaller than the turbos oil drain port. Needs to be minimum AN12 and even then is only just adequate once fittings are introduced which are smaller than the ID of the hose size - AN12 line is about 17mm tube ID and AN10 is around 13mm ID, and that's before the 1-2mm reduction in ID size from fittings.

This is the main reason I don't run braided drains. I use a 3/4" / 19mm hardpipe barb drain fitting on turbo and into block on the front a 3/4bsp barb fitting return, as its still bigger than even an AN12 male fitting inside. A 3/4 barb fitting is at least 17mm ID, which ends up being the smallest part of the oil drain setup. Doesn't look as cool but it definitely works.

Precision recommends minimum 5/8" ID oil return which is nearly 16mm internal hole size, which most people do not have when braided hose is installed for an oil drain line.

  • Like 2

All valid points as listed, however (this is just my opinion) since the turbo is off and all, it's not a huge investment to have your oil pressure always fixed for the turbo.

I would imagine the seals would prefer that rather than varying pressure.

When my 2nd motor went in, I got the guys at Birrong to install the OPR right after the oil feed and then have it drained back into the sump on the turbo oil return. Just makes the engine bay look a tad neater :) 

On 10/03/2022 at 12:32 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

All valid points as listed, however (this is just my opinion) since the turbo is off and all, it's not a huge investment to have your oil pressure always fixed for the turbo.

I would imagine the seals would prefer that rather than varying pressure.

When my 2nd motor went in, I got the guys at Birrong to install the OPR right after the oil feed and then have it drained back into the sump on the turbo oil return. Just makes the engine bay look a tad neater :) 

So are you saying your actual turbo drain and OPR big bypass drain share the same return ? If so that would be a big no no.

On 10/03/2022 at 2:06 PM, BK said:

So are you saying your actual turbo drain and OPR big bypass drain share the same return ? If so that would be a big no no.

at the moment yes, and so far (from the very limited driving) there hasn't been any issues yet - time will tell.

It's a -12 return.

BK is now patiently waiting for a new thread "Just blew my turbo, should I go G40-900 or 6266?"

LOL

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...