Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 21/04/2022 at 12:07 PM, r32-25t said:

It was more aimed at the post above yours where they recommended to pull the engine to change turbos 

Apologies, my bad.

English is my 3rd language so there are times I mistranslate into Bing Bong 😂

  • Haha 2
On 21/04/2022 at 5:32 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I like my gloves, but I'm a desk jockey that gets sore all over after rotating my tires and bleeding brakes.

Same here. Always need to wear those Ansell gloves after not working on cars for a decade + soft skin

I have 2 pairs of standard R32/R33 turbos if you want hehe (good condition)

  • Like 1

Spectrum Motorsports (Sold through Up Garage?) , appear to do twin turbos based on modern Garrett wheels.  May be worth looking into but unsure of anyone in Australia who has ran them

https://www.spectrummotorsportssolutions.com/collections/gt-r/products/r32-r33-r34-rb26-smr600

On 22/4/2022 at 9:37 PM, RB335 said:

Spectrum Motorsports (Sold through Up Garage?) , appear to do twin turbos based on modern Garrett wheels.  May be worth looking into but unsure of anyone in Australia who has ran them

https://www.spectrummotorsportssolutions.com/collections/gt-r/products/r32-r33-r34-rb26-smr600


good thread to read for twin guys wanted to put ‘billet’ wheels into compact GTR junker housings.

  • Like 1
On 4/22/2022 at 3:43 AM, niZmO_Man said:

Same here. Always need to wear those Ansell gloves after not working on cars for a decade + soft skin

I have 2 pairs of standard R32/R33 turbos if you want hehe (good condition)

I still debate what to do there honestly, the original turbos were covered in either a ton of blowby from the decades or seeping a little from the seals and I couldn't ship them with the car anyways. As far as I can tell nobody really rebuilds turbos with the factory ceramic turbine either. I'm also not sure that anyone cares about having the factory ceramic turbos, even for weird obsessives like me. Then again you have the Contempo Concepts of the world trying to source series 1 R32 steering wheels because the later revisions have slightly wider spokes which is unacceptable to them.

On 4/22/2022 at 7:03 PM, Piggaz said:


good thread to read for twin guys wanted to put ‘billet’ wheels into compact GTR junker housings.

I'm pretty sure you're right but it's kind of interesting to see the kinds of results that this tuner got with the magical beans.

244705525_ScreenShot2022-04-22at11_28_48PM.thumb.png.f5690590eaa9b9134362266577c1f4d4.png

They also report differences between the HKS 2530 turbos and the Garrett -5s which is interesting:

1613610769_ScreenShot2022-04-22at11_36_52PM.thumb.png.08a15f57998d8a530aa93da2be85177a.png

How real any of this is an open question but they sure sold me on the HKS magic bean journal bearing nuggets. Well, that and a lot of staring at Kansai Service/Midori Seibi dyno charts to get a sense for how they compared to the other relatively low power bolt-on turbos.

The factory ceramic turbos are garbage. They spool slightly better than anything else available but fall over as soon as they reach peak 15psi of boost in the mid range compared to anything else in the real world. Reality = garbage mid to top end output meaning car is actually slower and more underwhelming as you don't drive a GTR in the 2 - 4000rpm range expecting it to be the most awesome thing ever developed.

Also Garrett -5 is not original HKS 2530 direct equivalent - close but not the same. HKS 2530 will always make more power than a -5 with better overall power curve which I thought everyone knew by now. These billet wheels into existing housings are also stupid as it ends up being way to much compressor flow for the turbine side to handle as Paul pointed out equalling nugget response.

I suggest to stop trying to reinvent the wheel and find this RB26 spool nirvana ideology that doesn't exist. If you must twin turbo I'd sell your heap of shit journal bearing MHI based HKS GTIII-SS turbos and just run ball bearing -7 / -9 Garretts like the rest of the world running half decent low mount twins, or find a set of old HKS 2530s for that extra top end.

You'll be happier for it guaranteed 👍

(Until you try a single that is 😄)

  • Like 1
On 23/04/2022 at 9:58 PM, BK said:

If you must twin turbo I'd sell your heap of shit journal bearing MHI based HKS GT-III GT-SS turbos

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

They do remind me of Kando/Kinugawa turbos but that's maybe due to my biased opinion and the fact that I despise twin turbo upgrades on a RB26s.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The Kinugawa bolt-on turbos for RB26 are far larger than the -7s, it also lacks the HKS logo for extra JDM tyte points for cars and coffee. The goal isn't really to go for big power. The GTIII-SS obviously is down on response from bearing drag but it's a smaller turbo than the GT-SS. It's pretty much the smallest turbo readily available for the RB26 other than the factory ceramics. It's not going to impress anyone with numbers but if that was the goal I'd buy a Lucid Air.

On 24/04/2022 at 5:53 PM, Piggaz said:

GT - RS’s would have to be number 1, surely.

I guess it depends how you look at it. The GTIII-SS for choking the turbo with a turbine and exhaust housing too small or just lag city with the GT-RS being way too big to be useful on the compressor side.

GTIII-SS wins for being pointless but yeah, RS probably as 💩

On 24/4/2022 at 6:23 PM, Piggaz said:

GT - RS’s would have to be number 1, surely.

Dunno. GTRS are laggy but at least make some power, these are laggy and don’t make power. Sounds like a double loss 

  • Haha 1
On 24/04/2022 at 9:24 PM, r32-25t said:

Dunno. GTRS are laggy but at least make some power, these are laggy and don’t make power. Sounds like a double loss 

That's about right. Image how bad the GTIII-RS would be ?

  • Haha 2
On 24/4/2022 at 10:18 PM, BK said:

That's about right. Image how bad the GTIII-RS would be ?

We keep talking about these Japanese companies being stuck in the 90s but I guess now they’re moving towards the 80s 

  • Haha 1
On 4/24/2022 at 4:08 AM, BK said:

I guess it depends how you look at it. The GTIII-SS for choking the turbo with a turbine and exhaust housing too small or just lag city with the GT-RS being way too big to be useful on the compressor side.

GTIII-SS wins for being pointless but yeah, RS probably as 💩

Is the GTIII-SS actually mismatched between compressor and turbine? I've never been able to find any information on it. Only thing I know is the exhaust housing a/r is 0.54. 

A few twin turbo advocates here turned single turbo activists.

That's saying something. One guy *cough* Pig.. *cough* gaz famously said "I wouldn't change a thing" on his twin GT-RS RB26 with Tomei brap cams.

Well not sure whatever happened to that setup.

On 25/4/2022 at 10:10 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

A few twin turbo advocates here turned single turbo activists.

That's saying something. One guy *cough* Pig.. *cough* gaz famously said "I wouldn't change a thing" on his twin GT-RS RB26 with Tomei brap cams.

Well not sure whatever happened to that setup.

If I dig deep enough I could find that post too… but that was circa 2009 man. 🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...