Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Been running qfm a1rm front and rear last couple of visits to wakie...cannot fault them at all. Excellent stopping power and no fade on my setup. Bit of squeal here and there but that doesn't bother me at all. Easily best pad i've ever used.

Handed my car to a mate for one session and he is now buying the same pads!

HC+ is supposed to be really good, a lot of Porche owners and jap tuners rave about them but may I suggest you have look at the new 08 compound from PFC, they are develuped as a endurance pad and are next to none, Mines use rebranded PFC pads FYI, always has.

HC + is a bawse pad, however eats up rotors like a bawse too.

I wouldn't recommend it if the car never sees a track, as they eat rotors and squeal like camels mating with donkeys.

If purely street and some light track work Intima SR are decent. I find them a touch better than the QFM A1RM

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hey guys,

I'm keen on the QFM A1RM but unsure which to buy. I have R33 GTST front brakes and stock HR31 rears. The catalogue only states non turbo 33 brakes and Aus model 31. I am assuming the 32 GTR non Brembo will be the way to go for the front and the GTS Sillhouette Aus del for rears? Anyone knowledgable in 33's and 31's both Aus and Jap feel free to comment. The car is driven on the road to basically keep it going. It will see track days and drag days/nights.

Thanks in advance.

I use them around Wakefield holds up pretty well till about lap 5/6 when they fade.

A1RM would fade 3rd lap lol

I've just literally installed Project MU HC+ today and giving the shit box a shakedown on the 23rd August with a few mates.

Hmmmm. I currently have RB74's in there and didn't seem to run in any issues at SMP Brabham Circuit over 3 20 minute sessions. Was looking for something similar as it has some pretty quick sections, especially turn one and braking for turn 2 from a decent speed.

I recently fitted a set of Project MU HC+, have only travelled about 100 kms on the street with them so far but they seem to pull up very well and i have not heard the slightest bit of squeal yet.

Recently bought an r33 gtst-t with DBA vented discs up front (not sure exactly which ones) and stock discs at the back with Bendix pads. They don’t have very good bite initially (they feel a bit spongy but maybe the brakes need a bleed) but are ok under heavy brake load. Quite noisy also under light application.

Need to keep in mind that tyres you use will have a huge impact on braking (or lack of). What I have right now are cheap roadstones which with almost 100% tread still feel like plastic – absolute rubbish.

Looking at replacing brakes and tyres soon anyway as the plan is to do as much track work as possible.

Cheers,

Amir

  • 4 weeks later...

Has anyone used Winmax pads before? If so, which model and how did they go?

I changed my pads to A1RM a couple of months ago, today was my first drive through some mountains since installing the new pads and they pretty much gave up. I drove for about 20 minutes hard (bias toward uphill) then 15 minute break, then the pads faded within the first 5-10 minutes after the break (bias toward downhill).

Alright guys need a confirmation on Motul RBF600. It seems that some of the guys with 33 GTS-t use it. I bought some but realised that on the bottle it says its DOT4 but on my brake fluid reservoir it says to only use DOT3. Can anyone confirm that its ok/or not to use rbf600 in my 1997 r33?

Cheers

Amir

DOT 3, 4 and 5.1 brake fluids are all compatible with each other. DOT 5 apparently is not compatible but I've never come across it.

In the olden days, the higher number was meant to mean better performance (ie higher boiling point) but some of the best brake fluids now days are DOT 4.

  • 1 month later...

Oils ain't oils and now "Brakes ain't Brakes"

Well tried to read as much as I could and I am sure there is excellent info in amongst all of those brands and numbers, started writing them down but now my head hurts :(

Could a few of you blokes give me your best street/track combos that also work cold with no or minimal noise and I will see if I can put it together and go from there.

I believe Endless are OK..

Any help appreciated

Pete

Mainly Street DD

Edited by TT350GT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...